![]() |
Originally Posted by Osiris Actually, when we were doing some data logging....he mentioned that all the AFR settings were correct, it just gets all wacky when its fluctuating up and
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
That's why he would have used fuel compensation to even it out. Or it may be identical, who can say without trying? haha Edit: To clarify what I mean, lets say that @ WOT you start at 1.2v around 2k RPM and by redline you're reading 4.6v. Then you straighten out your airflow and now you're getting 0.9v at 2k RPM and by redline you're at 4.8v. Because the turbulence compressed your delta V over the rev range, and now that the turbulence isn't there, you're getting accurate flow numbers. But because your tuner set up your fueling tables based on that 1.2v-4.6v spread, you've got inaccurate fueling data throughout the rev range. See what I mean? (this is all theoretical, numbers picked at random) Last edited by Sh0velMan; 02-19-2013 at 02:28 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Long Term Update- '09 Sport 40K miles | Zxces50 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 21 | 05-13-2012 11:54 PM |
Royal Purple. Engine Damage In The Long Term? | CharleyGFX | Engine & Drivetrain | 73 | 08-16-2011 03:55 PM |
R&T Long Term Test Update | spearfish25 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 33 | 12-26-2009 09:29 AM |
R&T 370Z long term test | spearfish25 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 7 | 08-02-2009 01:16 AM |
Road and Track Long Term Test | jpit | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 1 | 06-25-2009 09:59 PM |