Nissan 370Z Forum  

VVEL control unlocked

Originally Posted by AlexRaymond19 Any update on VVEL tuning? Originally Posted by johncy2000 Any update on VVEL tuning? Originally Posted by NitrousZ34 Any update on VVEL tuning? I just recently

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Engine & Drivetrain > Tuning


Like Tree238Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2013, 05:00 AM   #316 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
JC671's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Guam
Posts: 451
Drives: Toretto around
Rep Power: 14
JC671 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexRaymond19 View Post
Any update on VVEL tuning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by johncy2000 View Post
Any update on VVEL tuning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NitrousZ34 View Post
Any update on VVEL tuning?
I just recently got an etune from Uprev and Randy says they do not offer it yet and he said that the VVEL is tuned good from the factory that after some runs they were unable to get any gains with a bolt on Z.


So far only one I've seen is John@Z1 offer this and has seen some gains from it.
__________________

A special "Thank You" to the Fast Intentions Crew!
"Fueled By Passion"
JC671 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 05:47 AM   #317 (permalink)
Track Member
 
AlexRaymond19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 771
Drives: 2010 Nissan 370z
Rep Power: 15
AlexRaymond19 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JC671 View Post
I just recently got an etune from Uprev and Randy says they do not offer it yet and he said that the VVEL is tuned good from the factory that after some runs they were unable to get any gains with a bolt on Z.


So far only one I've seen is John@Z1 offer this and has seen some gains from it.
Thanks for the info!
__________________
2010 370Z Touring MT | Stillen | Motordyne | Momentum| Z1 | Fast Intentions | Advant Garde | RE11 | Swift | SPC | Quaife | Whiteline | Evo R | 322RWHP 259ft-lb Mustang
AlexRaymond19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 06:36 PM   #318 (permalink)
Base Member
 
370zrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Mexico
Posts: 106
Drives: 370zM6tour12nosport
Rep Power: 12
370zrider is on a distinguished road
Default

I saw in UpRev's Facebook that pro tuners have the Beta version for VVEL tuning.

Hope someone in this forum that has had any experience with this would comment about it.
__________________
Stillen [gen3 CAI + headers + HFC + Exhaust + UD Pulley + lightweight flywheel] + Uprev e-tune+ PC680 Odyssey battery + oil cooler + MishimotoThermostat = 312whp + 252wtq @1,500mts or 5,000ft elevation
370zrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 06:44 PM   #319 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Baer383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lawrenceville,Ga
Posts: 4,293
Drives: My foot up your azz
Rep Power: 29
Baer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 370zrider View Post
I saw in UpRev's Facebook that pro tuners have the Beta version for VVEL tuning.

Hope someone in this forum that has had any experience with this would comment about it.
The VVEL is really going to shine with the guys who have FI,you N/A guys aren't going to gain that much at all.
__________________
2013 ZL1

754 rwhp 747 rwtq
Baer383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 10:19 PM   #320 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Sh0velMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20
Sh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baer383 View Post
The VVEL is really going to shine with the guys who have FI,you N/A guys aren't going to gain that much at all.
How do you figure?

How does changing the profile of the intake cam more dramatically affect the FI systems for the 370 than N/A?

The TT guys maybe could tweak it to add duration and lift earlier and spool faster? Maybe?

I dunno, you can't make it open any further or anything than it already does, that's why Uprev is saying they weren't able to get much out of it. They smoothed the curves a little on my car, but that's about it. It already goes to maximum (safe) lift and duration on the stock tune.
__________________
Buy My Car! | Build Thread
Sh0velMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2013, 12:14 PM   #321 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
DIGItonium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,800
Drives: 09 Z34-TT 6MT
Rep Power: 42
DIGItonium has a reputation beyond reputeDIGItonium has a reputation beyond reputeDIGItonium has a reputation beyond reputeDIGItonium has a reputation beyond reputeDIGItonium has a reputation beyond reputeDIGItonium has a reputation beyond reputeDIGItonium has a reputation beyond reputeDIGItonium has a reputation beyond reputeDIGItonium has a reputation beyond reputeDIGItonium has a reputation beyond reputeDIGItonium has a reputation beyond repute
Default

How about those with lower CR builds. I'm assuming the piston has a deeper dish, so would not increase valve travel clearance?
__________________
http://www.the370z.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=950&dateline=13162988  42
DIGItonium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2013, 01:36 PM   #322 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
SS_Firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7334
SS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

With Superchargers, there is a lot of blow through through the heads and makes it difficult to build pressure. Reducing the overlap and running a less aggressive profile will allow the SC's to get boost up quicker. Don't quote me, but I don't think turbo's have this same problem. It's also a big reason why long tubes weren't making the same power as a stock header because the heads and exhaust were too efficient. It made more power per lbs of boost, but not enough boost to make more power than the stock headers. I feel being able to control VVEL will be a big deal for supercharged cars. Maybe we can reduce overlap to increase pressure, and open it up progressively so it gets top end efficiency. Just a theory, but it sounds good lol.
Jordo! likes this.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction

SS_Firehawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2013, 07:16 PM   #323 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 418
Jordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS_Firehawk View Post
With Superchargers, there is a lot of blow through through the heads and makes it difficult to build pressure. Reducing the overlap and running a less aggressive profile will allow the SC's to get boost up quicker. Don't quote me, but I don't think turbo's have this same problem. It's also a big reason why long tubes weren't making the same power as a stock header because the heads and exhaust were too efficient. It made more power per lbs of boost, but not enough boost to make more power than the stock headers. I feel being able to control VVEL will be a big deal for supercharged cars. Maybe we can reduce overlap to increase pressure, and open it up progressively so it gets top end efficiency. Just a theory, but it sounds good lol.
Yep, there should still be some advantages NA, but FI greatly changes optimal valve timing. The ideal angle will change significantly as you force a greater volume of air into the cylinder.

Essentially, as I understand it, you want just enough overlap for achieving peak torque -- wrong timing means you just lose boost, blown out before it has a chance to build peak pressure.

With turbos I believe you want as little overlap as possible, as you want to get exhaust gasses flowing as much as possible. I'm more familiar with SC's, so someone correct me if I'm wrong.
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it.
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2013, 07:52 PM   #324 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Z370Z011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 1,052
Drives: PearlWhite 370z 6MT
Rep Power: 14
Z370Z011 is just really niceZ370Z011 is just really niceZ370Z011 is just really niceZ370Z011 is just really niceZ370Z011 is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS_Firehawk View Post
With Superchargers, there is a lot of blow through through the heads and makes it difficult to build pressure. Reducing the overlap and running a less aggressive profile will allow the SC's to get boost up quicker. Don't quote me, but I don't think turbo's have this same problem. It's also a big reason why long tubes weren't making the same power as a stock header because the heads and exhaust were too efficient. It made more power per lbs of boost, but not enough boost to make more power than the stock headers. I feel being able to control VVEL will be a big deal for supercharged cars. Maybe we can reduce overlap to increase pressure, and open it up progressively so it gets top end efficiency. Just a theory, but it sounds good lol.
Hmm, i was actually told the opposite. I had met some guy with a high horse power Z, and told me he supercharged his Z because the VVEL made turbos less efficient than a supercharger as far as reliability goes.

Dont hang me for this, just sharing what i was told lol

which actually made me re-think going TT. idk,
Z370Z011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2013, 08:16 PM   #325 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
SS_Firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7334
SS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z370Z011 View Post
Hmm, i was actually told the opposite. I had met some guy with a high horse power Z, and told me he supercharged his Z because the VVEL made turbos less efficient than a supercharger as far as reliability goes.

Dont hang me for this, just sharing what i was told lol

which actually made me re-think going TT. idk,
NP, I was talking to Mike@GTM over the phone about it and my long tubes. It's what he told me. Not the VVEL tuning piece, just the blow through effect and long tubes being too efficient. Likewise with a high flowing exhaust. The heads on the 370Z flow really really well.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction

SS_Firehawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 09:34 PM   #326 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Baer383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lawrenceville,Ga
Posts: 4,293
Drives: My foot up your azz
Rep Power: 29
Baer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond reputeBaer383 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sh0velMan View Post
How do you figure?

How does changing the profile of the intake cam more dramatically affect the FI systems for the 370 than N/A?

The TT guys maybe could tweak it to add duration and lift earlier and spool faster? Maybe?

I dunno, you can't make it open any further or anything than it already does, that's why Uprev is saying they weren't able to get much out of it. They smoothed the curves a little on my car, but that's about it. It already goes to maximum (safe) lift and duration on the stock tune.
Firehawk said it well,plus saved me allot of typing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS_Firehawk View Post
With Superchargers, there is a lot of blow through through the heads and makes it difficult to build pressure. Reducing the overlap and running a less aggressive profile will allow the SC's to get boost up quicker. Don't quote me, but I don't think turbo's have this same problem. It's also a big reason why long tubes weren't making the same power as a stock header because the heads and exhaust were too efficient. It made more power per lbs of boost, but not enough boost to make more power than the stock headers. I feel being able to control VVEL will be a big deal for supercharged cars. Maybe we can reduce overlap to increase pressure, and open it up progressively so it gets top end efficiency. Just a theory, but it sounds good lol.
__________________
2013 ZL1

754 rwhp 747 rwtq
Baer383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 07:17 AM   #327 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Sh0velMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20
Sh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant future
Default

All of these comments about blow through would be perfectly valid if we were talking about a system that does anything to the exhaust cam.

Until the variable phasing on the exhaust side is tunable, I don't see how it's relevant.

I don't see how holding the intake closed until the exhaust has closed would net you any real benefit since you'd be waiting until the piston was already on it's way back down before you open the valve. Surely any small gain you get from preventing blowthrough would be offset simply by there being far less time for gasses to enter the cylinder?

I mean, testing and time will tell, of course. Maybe they can work some magic?
__________________
Buy My Car! | Build Thread
Sh0velMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 02:58 PM   #328 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
SS_Firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7334
SS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Reducing the duration will increase pressure because less air is being blown through. With boost pressure just being a measurement of resistance, being able to modify how far and long the intake valves open should effectively change how and when the superchargers are reaching peak efficiency. The problem is there is too much overlap. The combustion process is still happening as usual, it's just when both the intake and exhaust valves are open, it's open for too long and reduces pressure. Getting more pressure built up on the intake side should allow more air to be pressurized in the combustion chamber when the intakes do open. Sorry if I'm talking in circles, I'm just trying to hit all the angles.
Jordo! likes this.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction

SS_Firehawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 04:09 PM   #329 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Sh0velMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20
Sh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant futureSh0velMan has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS_Firehawk View Post
Reducing the duration will increase pressure because less air is being blown through. With boost pressure just being a measurement of resistance, being able to modify how far and long the intake valves open should effectively change how and when the superchargers are reaching peak efficiency. The problem is there is too much overlap. The combustion process is still happening as usual, it's just when both the intake and exhaust valves are open, it's open for too long and reduces pressure. Getting more pressure built up on the intake side should allow more air to be pressurized in the combustion chamber when the intakes do open. Sorry if I'm talking in circles, I'm just trying to hit all the angles.
You could, in theory, make a funky intake cam profile that would work under boost, the problem is that it would be awful off of boost. Like, be a total misery to drive at anything less than 3/4 throttle and up.

Retarding the intake opening would make for some serious drivability issues, if taken too far (read: far enough to make any difference).

This is all in my estimation, so feel free to prove me wrong, GTM!
__________________
Buy My Car! | Build Thread
Sh0velMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 04:57 PM   #330 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
SS_Firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7334
SS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond reputeSS_Firehawk has a reputation beyond repute
Default

GTM hasn't talked about VVEL tuning with me, just the blow through effect. I have no idea if they tried tuning VVEL yet. I have no idea what the tables would look like for VVEL, but I imagine it can be tuned for all types of driving, NA, or FI. I wish there was more public info on the topic though.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction

SS_Firehawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VVEL Cracking? antivirus6613 Engine & Drivetrain 165 12-15-2011 01:20 PM
Found Possible Fix To VVEL Nabi Tuning 35 10-23-2011 06:13 PM
Vvel ???? pokeyl Tuning 8 06-01-2011 03:33 PM
VVEL Tuning KEVTEX Tuning 20 10-08-2010 11:23 PM
Vvel destinyZ Engine & Drivetrain 13 09-19-2010 06:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2