![]() |
Originally Posted by Nissanboy I don't see how this could improve power on NA applications as the intake lift is already at it's maximum point (goes from 2mm to 11m
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 419 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I'll see if I can find the image and post it. EDIT: Here... ![]()
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. Last edited by Jordo!; 10-13-2012 at 09:01 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Ronin Samurai - Assassin
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Fayettenam,Pennsyltucky
Age: 69
Posts: 35,427
Drives: 2011 Nismo GM 6M
Rep Power: 2684438 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
So that chart is saying max is about .500" lift. But it's only using up to .450" lift. HMMMMMM You know how much duration there is?
__________________
![]() 浪人 - 殺し屋 "The Difficult Anytime, The Impossible By Appointment Only" http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-...o-journal.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: H-Town
Posts: 378
Drives: Too slow
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Reason being is I've taken several Nissan courses (Currently a Nissan Tech) and they've always stated that the max lift is 11mm due to the eccentric cam only being to big. I'm not trying to say that I'm correct or anything, I'm just wondering why they wouldn't of mentioned it. Another reason being is if there is more lift available, why did they not implement it into the power band? Only reason I could see why not is because our motors being interference motors it could cause a clash between the piston and the valves. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 419 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() google VVEL and 370Z in images and it will pop up on the first page ![]() EDIT: Whoops -- it just links back to another thread on here. I'll shoot you a PM. I'm guessing because of the same factors that result in other tuning limits -- gas mileage and emissions. I find it hard to believe there's no wiggle room left. Even with ignition timing, where there is not much room for advance, a couple of extra degrees can be safely dialed in, and that nets in reasonable power gains. I find it hard to believe the valve timing is optimized for power and any other changes result in valves hitting the pistons or power loss. If the tolerances were THAT tight, it means that with just a little valve float at high revs, you'd see mushroomed valves occurring here and there, and I haven't heard of a single failure like that, even though most people bump up the rev limit by a few hundred RPM and plenty of people beat on the car. Moreover, even if timing and overlap is optimized when stock, slap on a free flowing exhaust, different IM or set of headers and its (potentially) a different ball game.
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. Last edited by Jordo!; 10-31-2012 at 11:17 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: H-Town
Posts: 378
Drives: Too slow
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 419 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
For example, many OEM tunes run much richer than necessary under high load, and high engine (air, water, and or oil) temps and or dial back ignition advance, resulting in a less efficient burn and wasted power -- but it substantially reduces the likelihood of ping under extreme conditions. Also, in general, peak torque tends to be made with a richer than stoichiometric mixture anyway... that might not be true with a good DI system on the same motor (or, I dunno, with water injection), but it's pretty tough to gain power AND use less fuel or produce fewer hydrocarbons in practice on a typical port injection engine. As to valve lift and overlap on this particular motor -- it's all an empirical question. We simply need more data.
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. Last edited by Jordo!; 10-31-2012 at 07:36 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: H-Town
Posts: 378
Drives: Too slow
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Anyways back onto topic about VVEL unlocked. I want to see some more results! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VVEL Cracking? | antivirus6613 | Engine & Drivetrain | 165 | 12-15-2011 01:20 PM |
Found Possible Fix To VVEL | Nabi | Tuning | 35 | 10-23-2011 06:13 PM |
Vvel ???? | pokeyl | Tuning | 8 | 06-01-2011 03:33 PM |
VVEL Tuning | KEVTEX | Tuning | 20 | 10-08-2010 11:23 PM |
Vvel | destinyZ | Engine & Drivetrain | 13 | 09-19-2010 06:32 PM |