Nissan 370Z Forum  

Optimal ride height for track setup

Looking for thoughts on how far to drop from stock height for track setup for ideal CG. I am installing Bilstein B16 PSS10 on 2014 Sport where a professional race

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip


Like Tree94Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2020, 07:52 AM   #1 (permalink)
Base Member
 
loufitness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 74
Drives: 14 370Z Pearl White
Rep Power: 3365
loufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond repute
Default Optimal ride height for track setup

Looking for thoughts on how far to drop from stock height for track setup for ideal CG.

I am installing Bilstein B16 PSS10 on 2014 Sport where a professional race shop will be performing the setup. I am just looking to see what amount of drop those of you with track experience recommend.

Key input:
- Track experience 25+ days
- 75% Track Use / 25% Weekend Driver (I do drive it to track - 150 Miles)
- RS4 275/40/18 square
- SPL Upper Control Arms
- Hotchkins Front and Rear Bars
- No Aero
- Current Camber is -2.75...but expect it will go to -3.x
__________________
2014 Pearl White Sport Pkg / Motordyne Shockwave / 25 Row Setrab / SS Brake lines / Motul RBF 600 / Hawk DTC-60 / SPL Upper Control Arms / Enkei RP07 / Hankook RS4 275/40/18 Square / Schroth Harness / EVO-R Carbon Fiber Accents / Bilstein B16 PSS 10
loufitness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2020, 12:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 599
Drives: 08 Expedition
Rep Power: 6764
dts3 has a reputation beyond reputedts3 has a reputation beyond reputedts3 has a reputation beyond reputedts3 has a reputation beyond reputedts3 has a reputation beyond reputedts3 has a reputation beyond reputedts3 has a reputation beyond reputedts3 has a reputation beyond reputedts3 has a reputation beyond reputedts3 has a reputation beyond reputedts3 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I'm literally getting rs4 in that size put on Monday. How do you like them?
__________________
Visit my blog!
www.LeftoverPi.com
dts3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2020, 10:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 626
Drives: Poor man's Porsche
Rep Power: 541
Brendan has a reputation beyond reputeBrendan has a reputation beyond reputeBrendan has a reputation beyond reputeBrendan has a reputation beyond reputeBrendan has a reputation beyond reputeBrendan has a reputation beyond reputeBrendan has a reputation beyond reputeBrendan has a reputation beyond reputeBrendan has a reputation beyond reputeBrendan has a reputation beyond reputeBrendan has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I never found an answer when I was looking this up and from what I can see and measure, you don't have to worry about going so low that the roll centers end up below the road surface.

I'm at 26.5" from floor to bottom of fender. If you are on ots Bilstein you will probably need to run on the higher side around 27" or more to avoid bottoming out the chassis on the pavement on common road imperfections.

Edit: I am on 275/40/18 yokohama ao52
Sharad909 likes this.

Last edited by Brendan; 05-11-2020 at 10:51 AM.
Brendan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2020, 11:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
cv129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,191
Drives: 09 Nismo, 16 Nismo
Rep Power: 159827
cv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Been looking for these two posts on and off for the longest time, finally found them again. May find some of the stuff useful regarding BGTV8’s rationale on trying not to lower the car too much.

going square how did you like it?

Need help eliminating oversteer
JARblue likes this.
__________________
Setrab | RE-71 | SPL | JRZ | Nismo | ARK | Whiteline | RacingBrake | CJM Oil Pan | Ti shield
cv129 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2020, 12:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Ronin Samurai - Assassin
 
Rusty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Fayettenam,Pennsyltucky
Age: 68
Posts: 34,860
Drives: 2011 Nismo GM 6M
Rep Power: 2684436
Rusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond repute
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by cv129 View Post
Been looking for these two posts on and off for the longest time, finally found them again. May find some of the stuff useful regarding BGTV8’s rationale on trying not to lower the car too much.

going square how did you like it?

Need help eliminating oversteer
The Z does not have a linear camber curve in the rear. How can I explain this. This is just an example. Say you have your camber set at -1. Squat the rear inch, camber goes to -2. Squat 2 inches, camber goes to -3. In the Z, squat 1 inch, camber is -2. Squat 2 inches, camber is now -3.5. Also, the lower the rear. The more non linear the camber curve becomes. Lower the Z by 1 inch. Camber at -1. Squat 1 inch, camber is now -2.25. Squat 2 inches, camber now at -3.75. I don't know what the exact numbers are. But that's the way is was explained to me from AM Perf.
__________________

浪人 - 殺し屋
"The Difficult Anytime, The Impossible By Appointment Only"
http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-...o-journal.html
Rusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2020, 01:13 AM   #6 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,160
Drives: 15 370Z Nismo 6MT
Rep Power: 203226
OptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond reputeOptionZero has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I don’t think this is related to height - in those two linked threads, there was a lot of talk about curing oversteer in those race cars. I noticed those cars had TRUE TYPE coilovers running heavy springs in rear...


Since those threads we discussed how true type required a different spring rate from divorced type. I wonder if those drivers would have solved their issues by going softer in rear accordingly
Hotrodz likes this.
__________________
OptionZero Build Thread
OptionZero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2020, 01:34 AM   #7 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Sharad909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: SoCal
Posts: 65
Drives: 2012 370Z 6MT Sport
Rep Power: 3360
Sharad909 has a reputation beyond reputeSharad909 has a reputation beyond reputeSharad909 has a reputation beyond reputeSharad909 has a reputation beyond reputeSharad909 has a reputation beyond reputeSharad909 has a reputation beyond reputeSharad909 has a reputation beyond reputeSharad909 has a reputation beyond reputeSharad909 has a reputation beyond reputeSharad909 has a reputation beyond reputeSharad909 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

From my experience, going to low will cause understeer. I try not to go too extreme on dropping the ride height. It does help on tighter corner tracks.
__________________
12 370Z- Touring- Sport- 6MT-
Z1 Anti Starv, 34R Setrab Kit, 20/25MM | Konig 18x10.5 W/ Hankook RS4 | PowerStop TrackSpec Pads | TTP Single Exit , & Swift Springs | Previously Owned: 18 Q50- 480RWHP- 12.2 @118- Sold, 92 240SX Built SR
Sharad909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2020, 08:39 AM   #8 (permalink)
Base Member
 
loufitness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 74
Drives: 14 370Z Pearl White
Rep Power: 3365
loufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond reputeloufitness has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Thanks for the replies...I just looking to see how much you track guys have dropped...1/2", 1", 1.25", etc and feel good about where you are.

Brendan - I am currently sitting at 27 3/8" on 18" wheels with stock dampers.

Rusty - I expect the suspension shop would set the appropriate Camber settings given the final lowered stance...would't they? I will remind them of the non-linear camber rate on squat.

Sharad - I have no need to go "real" low...this is not for looks...it is for performance. Hence my question as to what ride height seems to be working for those who track?

I do not have any understeer problems today (at Square and -2.75 camber)....my objectives are to be fully planted, car control (increase confidence on high speed turns) and address excessive outer tire wear.
__________________
2014 Pearl White Sport Pkg / Motordyne Shockwave / 25 Row Setrab / SS Brake lines / Motul RBF 600 / Hawk DTC-60 / SPL Upper Control Arms / Enkei RP07 / Hankook RS4 275/40/18 Square / Schroth Harness / EVO-R Carbon Fiber Accents / Bilstein B16 PSS 10
loufitness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2020, 09:40 AM   #9 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
cv129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,191
Drives: 09 Nismo, 16 Nismo
Rep Power: 159827
cv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond reputecv129 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OptionZero View Post
I don’t think this is related to height - in those two linked threads, there was a lot of talk about curing oversteer in those race cars. I noticed those cars had TRUE TYPE coilovers running heavy springs in rear...


Since those threads we discussed how true type required a different spring rate from divorced type. I wonder if those drivers would have solved their issues by going softer in rear accordingly
It’s specifically BG’s response. It’s about the part where he discussed lowering CG via smaller diameter wheel + tire vs lowering via spring, leading to benefits on keeping a longer suspension stroke (also see how second post mentions lowering too much via spring messes up the roll center), and how he managed the gain in rear toe-OUT under braking (makes the rear end wander) during braking. Add what Rusty said, sort of finicky nature of camber change.

It’s not so much directly related. Just somewhat related.
JARblue likes this.
__________________
Setrab | RE-71 | SPL | JRZ | Nismo | ARK | Whiteline | RacingBrake | CJM Oil Pan | Ti shield

Last edited by cv129; 05-10-2020 at 09:43 AM.
cv129 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2020, 12:00 PM   #10 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ga
Posts: 13,512
Drives: 2013 Nismo 370z
Rep Power: 2684391
Spooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty View Post
The Z does not have a linear camber curve in the rear. How can I explain this. This is just an example. Say you have your camber set at -1. Squat the rear inch, camber goes to -2. Squat 2 inches, camber goes to -3. In the Z, squat 1 inch, camber is -2. Squat 2 inches, camber is now -3.5. Also, the lower the rear. The more non linear the camber curve becomes. Lower the Z by 1 inch. Camber at -1. Squat 1 inch, camber is now -2.25. Squat 2 inches, camber now at -3.75. I don't know what the exact numbers are. But that's the way is was explained to me from AM Perf.
I have been told that the rear camber issue can be fixed but it is expensive. Requires totally modifying the rear subframe and pickup points. I never got into the details of it but I may later on.
JARblue and Rusty like this.
Spooler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2020, 12:06 PM   #11 (permalink)
Ronin Samurai - Assassin
 
Rusty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Fayettenam,Pennsyltucky
Age: 68
Posts: 34,860
Drives: 2011 Nismo GM 6M
Rep Power: 2684436
Rusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond repute
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spooler View Post
I have been told that the rear camber issue can be fixed but it is expensive. Requires totally modifying the rear subframe and pickup points. I never got into the details of it but I may later on.
That's what i was told too. That to correct it, Some of the pivot points have to be move. It's not cheap and involving lots of engineering.
FL 4Motion and Spooler like this.
__________________

浪人 - 殺し屋
"The Difficult Anytime, The Impossible By Appointment Only"
http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-...o-journal.html
Rusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2020, 01:04 PM   #12 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ga
Posts: 13,512
Drives: 2013 Nismo 370z
Rep Power: 2684391
Spooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond reputeSpooler has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty View Post
That's what i was told too. That to correct it, Some of the pivot points have to be move. It's not cheap and involving lots of engineering.
Yeap, I think MA-Motorsports can do it. Brian is the one that told me.
Rusty likes this.
Spooler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2020, 10:58 PM   #13 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
Hotrodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NW, AZ
Posts: 9,330
Drives: 10 Nissan 370z Nismo
Rep Power: 2684384
Hotrodz has a reputation beyond reputeHotrodz has a reputation beyond reputeHotrodz has a reputation beyond reputeHotrodz has a reputation beyond reputeHotrodz has a reputation beyond reputeHotrodz has a reputation beyond reputeHotrodz has a reputation beyond reputeHotrodz has a reputation beyond reputeHotrodz has a reputation beyond reputeHotrodz has a reputation beyond reputeHotrodz has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I wouldn't run any lower than two inches. Nismo stock is 28" floor to the finder well. There always trade offs. If you run a splitter you want to get as low as possible without causing issues. I run 26" front and 26.5" rear.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
__________________
Fast Intentions TT Installed and Tuned by Seb at SpecialtyZ 610whp 560tq:|Fast Intentions 3" TT-TDX|SpecialtyZ/Fast Intentions 72 Row Oil Cooler|SZ 6 Puck Clutch & Flywheel|3GsCustoms|Z1|Wavetrac|Hotchkis|Whiteline |Blitz|Fortune Auto 500|Fujimura|SPL|H&R|TK|TWM|RPM Rollbar|Sparco|Next Level Performance|TrackSpec|AeroFlow Dynamics|Pioneer|
Hotrodz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2020, 12:07 AM   #14 (permalink)
Ronin Samurai - Assassin
 
Rusty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Fayettenam,Pennsyltucky
Age: 68
Posts: 34,860
Drives: 2011 Nismo GM 6M
Rep Power: 2684436
Rusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond reputeRusty has a reputation beyond repute
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotrodz View Post
I wouldn't run any lower than two inches. Nismo stock is 28" floor to the finder well. There always trade offs. If you run a splitter you want to get as low as possible without causing issues. I run 26" front and 26.5" rear.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
The other thing about going too low. You are no longer in the middle of your shock/coil-over stroke. You are now closer to the bump stops. If you are riding on the bump stops in a turn and hit a bump. You don't have any travel to absorb the bump. Something not good is going to happen. The next thing is if hard on the brakes before a turn. You use up your travel and are on the bump stops. You hit a bump, guess what happens next. This may be one of the reasons for ice mode. Something to think about.
__________________

浪人 - 殺し屋
"The Difficult Anytime, The Impossible By Appointment Only"
http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-...o-journal.html
Rusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2020, 02:14 AM   #15 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Glendale
Posts: 97
Drives: 19' 370z 6MT
Rep Power: 8
vq37818 is on a distinguished road
Default

If you have a proper thread-into-body coilover, don’t worry about travel within your suspension components. The biggest problem is that lowering our double wishbone fronts causes unwanted alignment changes and limits suspension travel from the front upper control arm to the strut tower.

At stock height, the upper control arm will sit nearly perpendicular to the front knuckle; therefore, the camber/toe doesn’t not change a lot through compression/extension. Lower the car 1-2 inches, now that upper control arm sits at a 30-45 degree angle upwards. With the same amount of compression/extension, the camber/toe will change drastically more. Over bumps, the car will be easy to unsettle because your tire contact patch is diminishing.

Ideally, you would shorten knuckles and get full SPL arms to eliminate this unpredictability (similar idea for the rear to prevent unpredictable oversteer from camber/toe changes when lowered), but that’s a lot of $$$ and work to support a simple mod.

Basically the closer the ride height to stock, the better your car will handle. The alignment benefits really outweigh the slim benefits from low COG. Driver confidence is key. A low bucket seat will also help.
JARblue, cv129, Rusty and 3 others like this.
__________________
2019 370z Sport 6MT | Magnetic Black
vq37818 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ride Height Help! LittleWhiteZ Brakes & Suspension 14 10-04-2019 07:25 PM
Proper ride height for Track SPOHN Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip 104 12-30-2013 01:09 PM
Tire question about sidewall height in relation to ride height... chuckd05 Wheels & Tires 2 05-07-2011 04:03 AM
Ride height not even on my new Z Aaron1 Brakes & Suspension 17 01-15-2011 03:16 PM
Stock ride height? the_student Brakes & Suspension 1 07-05-2010 04:09 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2