![]() |
Originally Posted by j-rho Not trying to argue about it man, I sincerely hope this discussion in some way helps somebody learn a little more of the basics of things.
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 769
Drives: '12 370Z 6M Sport
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
You actually raised a really good point by suggesting putting 5000 lb springs on the rear. Yes, the damn rear would skate worse than Tonya Harding at that point lol. With a 5000 spring in the rear and a 600 lb spring in the front, the ratio would be .33. This makes me wrong. Everyone knows that a 5000 lb spring in the rear is going to make the rear un-dampable unless the rear weighs 2500 lbs per corner. That's what you are missing. The spring rate doesn't matter, it's the spring rate and the corner weight. But that got me thinking as well. If this is an inverse function which I know it is, then it is exponential as well. Let's do the opposite of what you are suggesting and put a 100 lb spring in the front of the car with a 600 lb spring in the rear. Guess what, car understeers like whoah. What's the ratio? .39. Wow, that's really weird, .33 is close to .39. So why does your 5000 spring in the rear make it oversteer, and my 100 lb spring in the front make it understeer? Everyone knows that putting a 100 lb spring underneath a 750 lb corner is going to be near useless. Just like anyone that puts a 5000 lb spring under a 750 lb corner is not going to get good results. Assuming a motion ratio of .62 at all four corners(close to oem) if the car was perfectly corner balanced at 750 lbs each, .62 * 760 = 465 lb spring. Lets put 465 lb springs on a perfectly balanced car, by my math, it would produce a ratio of 1. Let's for argument sake assume that is a very bad idea. So, you can either stiffen the front or soften the rear. lets add 100 lbs of spring to the front. New ratio = 1.06 This will probably not have much effect, tell me if you disagree. Lets add 100 more. New ratio = 1.15. Wow, big change(exponential actually). My guess is that this will drastically reduce understeer Since the front will not roll over and the fronts will transfer weight to the back much easier. Tell me if you disagree. Lets add 500 more lbs of spring. ratio 1.52. My guess is the front of the car at this point is barely controllable and is skating all over the place , not quite as bad as Tonya at the Olympics , but is definitely prone to break loose. A 750 lb corner sitting on top of an 1150+ lb spring barely allows the dampers to do their job. so we went from the following ratios 1.00 Not a good idea. 1.06 Not much better. 1.15 If we agree, we reduced understeer( or added oversteer) 1.52 Turned the front end into a Frisbee. the same works in reverse 1.00 not good idea .94 not much better .85 Increased understeer (or removed oversteer) .48 turned the car into a knee board with no rudder.
__________________
Current Mods: Vorpal Weapon +5. Last edited by GSS138; 08-14-2014 at 10:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| JPY - USD Rate change | diddy535 | The Lounge (Off Topic) | 7 | 05-11-2013 11:49 AM |
| Yes or no? Please rate | xbigb4ller69z | Wheels & Tires | 26 | 03-11-2010 10:53 AM |
| Rate Your Exhaust | jpit | Intake/Exhaust | 22 | 09-29-2009 08:18 PM |
| Selling Eibach spring and OEM spring | spia | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 8 | 06-13-2009 08:18 AM |