05-10-2020, 09:40 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,272
Drives: 09 Nismo, 16 Nismo
Rep Power: 163996
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OptionZero
I don’t think this is related to height - in those two linked threads, there was a lot of talk about curing oversteer in those race cars. I noticed those cars had TRUE TYPE coilovers running heavy springs in rear...
Since those threads we discussed how true type required a different spring rate from divorced type. I wonder if those drivers would have solved their issues by going softer in rear accordingly
|
It’s specifically BG’s response. It’s about the part where he discussed lowering CG via smaller diameter wheel + tire vs lowering via spring, leading to benefits on keeping a longer suspension stroke (also see how second post mentions lowering too much via spring messes up the roll center), and how he managed the gain in rear toe-OUT under braking (makes the rear end wander) during braking. Add what Rusty said, sort of finicky nature of camber change.
It’s not so much directly related. Just somewhat related.
__________________
Setrab | RE-71 | SPL | JRZ | Nismo | ARK | Whiteline | RacingBrake | CJM Oil Pan | Ti shield
Last edited by cv129; 05-10-2020 at 09:43 AM.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
94Likes
Hybrid Mode
