![]() |
Why would you base it all on one data point? If you gained 10 whp in the middle and 3 at the peak, would you say the car only gained
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 419 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Why would you base it all on one data point?
If you gained 10 whp in the middle and 3 at the peak, would you say the car only gained 3 whp?
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
Track Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas
Posts: 697
Drives: 09 370 sports clone
Rep Power: 14 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
But of course all of us on this forum know...... area under curve counts just as much if not more for driveability.
__________________
09 370z 6spd traded 1/12/15 for 15 Challenger RT 6spd ![]() Last edited by 7speed; 04-17-2013 at 07:42 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: west
Posts: 443
Drives: 2012 370z man. sport
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
If a car makes 200 HP at 4000 rpm. in one chart and in another chart it makes 210 HP at 4200 rpm , you can 't say there was a 10 HP gain between to 2 charts. Data points between the 2 charts must be identical in order to illustrate an accurate comparison. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 419 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() I'm not making a case for a mean gain of x at datapoint y, I'm showing that a humble change of a filter does indeed net gains throughout the rev range, as shown on two vehicles for which I have data on hand. There's too many transient variables that may affect the magnitude of change at a specific location in the rev range. That we see gains throughout the rev range -- albeit at different points -- on two units is generally good evidence that high flow filters make a positive improvement. Comparing the same car at the same point before and after still provides useful information. That car A gained 3 whp at 3500 RPM whereas car B gained 5 is not really the issue -- we have no specific hypotheses about that, and again there are too many transient modifiers that will influence things. Anyway, one shows gains from filters alone the other shows gains from a combo of filters and tubes. The filters alone netted about a 2% gain at 5252 RPM (or as close to it as I could align the cursor) and with both the gain is about 4% when hp and torque are equal. Here they are again with a single selected RPM point -- 5252 RPM (or as close to it as I could align the cursor)-- for comparison... same day too. 2011 Z ![]() 2009 Z ![]() Interpret these data as you will...
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. Last edited by Jordo!; 04-18-2013 at 07:26 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[FOR SALE] Stock exhaust, air boxes and black base door panels | Puma0183 | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 1 | 03-18-2013 02:16 PM |
[WTB] Stock Intakes/Air Boxes | kuriz32 | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 8 | 03-12-2013 10:54 PM |
FS: Z1 Post Air Tubes, K&N Drop in Filters, OEM Air Boxes | COSMO | Cars for sale (Private Classifieds) | 0 | 02-06-2013 07:37 PM |
Cone filters with stock air box? | 2013Zsport | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 8 | 12-03-2012 06:15 PM |
Wanted - Stock air boxes | Kastley85891 | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 5 | 12-15-2009 08:17 AM |