![]() |
From results posted, the reduced weight crankshaft pulley shows up as a gain on the dyno. And apparently the lighter weight driveshaft does too, if we are indeed around 17%
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 86
Drives: 2011 370Z Coupe
Rep Power: 251 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From results posted, the reduced weight crankshaft pulley shows up as a gain on the dyno.
And apparently the lighter weight driveshaft does too, if we are indeed around 17% loss vs. 20%. That claim is speculative of course as you can't prove it (unless you would actually change the driveshaft). So why not for the wheels/tires/rotors? Here is the part that boggles me. If all four corners are reduced in weight, and you do see a gain at the dyno, would the gain actually be MORE because you can't dyno the front? If the answer was yes I would be shopping right now for lighter weight tires, rotors, and wheels. |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FOR SALE] Nismo Exhaust - Nismo 19" Forged rays wheels. | Bleazi | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 12 | 10-16-2011 08:04 AM |
| wanted nismo rims for 370z and nismo stune rear spoiler | edphoenix01 | New Nismo 370Z Owner | 0 | 09-29-2010 06:44 PM |
| 340WHP AP1 S2K 1/4 result? | leepeen | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 17 | 06-30-2009 12:34 PM |