340Whp & @260TQ NISMO

Cmike2780 · 03-13-2012, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

You aren't under my skin. You "corrected" someone and provided bad information. I Simply explained why he was correct and you were not.

Oh dear god! It seems like I did. Ha! whatever

. Not worth my time explaining. I was simply explaining he was referring to the original math, not yours.

Red__Zed · 03-13-2012, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780

Oh dear god! It seems like I did. Ha! whatever

. Not worth my time explaining. I was simply explaining he was referring to the original math, not yours.

Can you help me understand what you are trying to say here please? I must be really slow.

tomnavone · 03-13-2012, 06:24 PM

How many more threads can u two derail today?
2 for 2 so far

Red__Zed · 03-13-2012, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomnavone

How many more threads can u two derail today?
2 for 2 so far

This thread is about these dyno numbers and the results claimed by the shop. Our discussion is entirely related.

Cmike2780 · 03-13-2012, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

Can you help me understand what you are trying to say here please? I must be really slow.

I'm saying he says the OP was saying 20% but they were using 25%. Does it make sense now?
73 hp difference over 292 Dyno result equals 25%

Red__Zed · 03-13-2012, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780

I'm saying he says the OP was saying 20% but they were using 25%. Does it make sense now?
73 hp difference over 292 Dyno result equals 25%

Which is a 20% drivetrain loss, as he states.

Cmike2780 · 03-13-2012, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

Which is a 20% drivetrain loss, as he states.

Bingo! I think I see where we differ in perspective. The OP was referring to percentage increase over the Dyno number. Which to get a 25% 'increase' to get you that flywheel number, you would use 1.25. Since you don't technically know that 73hp difference, you have to use the percentage increase over the dyno number. Like I've said twice now. I never said you were wrong. It's a 20% loss over the flywheel number but 25% gain over the Dyno number. I think we're just mixing symantics when referring to 'drivetrain loss'.

Red__Zed · 03-13-2012, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780

Bingo! I think I see where we differ in perspective. The OP was referring to percentage increase over the Dyno number. Which to get a 25% 'increase' to get you that flywheel number, you would use 1.25. Since you don't technically know that 73hp difference, you have to use the percentage increase over the dyno number. Like I've said twice now. I never said you were wrong. It's a 20% loss over the flywheel number but 25% gain over the Dyno number. I think we're just mixing symantics when referring to 'drivetrain loss'.

you "correct" him and say that his 1.25 figure is 25%, when his reference is clearly to drivetrain loss.

If you had understood from the beginning, you'd have just agreed....

Cmike2780 · 03-13-2012, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

you "correct" him and say that his 1.25 figure is 25%, when his reference is clearly to drivetrain loss.

If you had understood from the beginning, you'd have just agreed....

Drivetrain loss as in the actual hp number not the percentage decrease. It's the same number. You just had to go on your math rant.

This has gone on long enough. Agree to disagree. If your intent is just to call me out, I really don't care.

red6spd · 03-13-2012, 06:50 PM

Is it me or does Red_Zed seem to be involved in 99.9% of the arguments on this thread?

theDreamer · 03-13-2012, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red6spd

Is it me or does Red_Zed seem to be involved in 99.9% of the arguments on this thread?

Just you.

red6spd · 03-13-2012, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theDreamer

Just you.

Guess your wrong.

theDreamer · 03-13-2012, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red6spd

Guess your wrong.

Really? You sure about that.....

red6spd · 03-13-2012, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theDreamer

Really? You sure about that.....

Well since someone else agreed with me um yea I'm sure.

tomnavone · 03-13-2012, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red6spd

Is it me or does Red_Zed seem to be involved in 99.9% of the arguments on this thread?

And its getting old real fast

03-13-2012, 06:24 PM	#3 (permalink)
tomnavone Track Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: S.F. Bay Area Posts: 723 Drives: Supercharged 370z Rep Power: 18	How many more threads can u two derail today? 2 for 2 so far __________________ GTM Supercharger/HKS Camp2/Berk cbe/Motordyne art pipes/Hotchkis sways/ Eibach Springs/ Black Volk TE37/Bridgestone S-04 Powered by

03-13-2012, 06:50 PM	#10 (permalink)
red6spd A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Long Island NY Posts: 3,277 Drives: 2010 Z Coupe M6 SPT Rep Power: 22	Is it me or does Red_Zed seem to be involved in 99.9% of the arguments on this thread? __________________ 2010 Base+Sport 6spd: Stillen G3, FI Non-Resonated CBE, FI Non-Resonated Test Pipes, UpRev Tuned, Custom 24R Oil Cooler, JDM Rear Fog-OEM Harness. ???Whp ???WTQ (Will find out come spring time)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[FOR SALE] Nismo Exhaust - Nismo 19" Forged rays wheels.	Bleazi	Parts for sale (Private Classifieds)	12	10-16-2011 08:04 AM
wanted nismo rims for 370z and nismo stune rear spoiler	edphoenix01	New Nismo 370Z Owner	0	09-29-2010 06:44 PM
340WHP AP1 S2K 1/4 result?	leepeen	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	17	06-30-2009 12:34 PM