340Whp & @260TQ NISMO

AlphaSnacks · 03-13-2012, 05:56 PM

Yes, dating back to 350Zs.

b1adesofcha0s · 03-13-2012, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnold K.

Yes, dating back to 350Zs.

That's cool, I never knew that before. We actually have some functional carbon fiber on our cars

Cmike2780 · 03-13-2012, 06:11 PM

Lol, Good god red I wasn't interpreting anything. He was referring to the original post, which I thought meant exactly what you said. The percentage increase over the Dyno number, not the 20% loss.

I don't think it's even accurate way of determining actual drivetrain loss. I prefer using the rated flywheel hp, baseline Dyno and new Dyno number

332/baseline Dyno=x/new Dyno number

Lol, I never said you were wrong by the way. So easy to get under your skin isn't it?

Red__Zed · 03-13-2012, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780

Lol, Good god red I wasn't interpreting anything. He was referring to the original post, which I thought meant exactly what you said. The percentage increase over the Dyno number, not the 20% loss.

I don't think it's even accurate way of determining actual drivetrain loss. I prefer using the rated flywheel hp, baseline Dyno and new Dyno number

332/baseline Dyno=x/new Dyno number

Lol, I never said you were wrong by the way. So easy to get under your skin isn't it?

You aren't under my skin. You "corrected" someone and provided bad information. I Simply explained why he was correct and you were not.

tomnavone · 03-13-2012, 06:24 PM

How many more threads can u two derail today?
2 for 2 so far

Cmike2780 · 03-13-2012, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

You aren't under my skin. You "corrected" someone and provided bad information. I Simply explained why he was correct and you were not.

Oh dear god! It seems like I did. Ha! whatever

. Not worth my time explaining. I was simply explaining he was referring to the original math, not yours.

Red__Zed · 03-13-2012, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780

Oh dear god! It seems like I did. Ha! whatever

. Not worth my time explaining. I was simply explaining he was referring to the original math, not yours.

Can you help me understand what you are trying to say here please? I must be really slow.

Cmike2780 · 03-13-2012, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

Can you help me understand what you are trying to say here please? I must be really slow.

I'm saying he says the OP was saying 20% but they were using 25%. Does it make sense now?
73 hp difference over 292 Dyno result equals 25%

red6spd · 03-13-2012, 06:50 PM

Is it me or does Red_Zed seem to be involved in 99.9% of the arguments on this thread?

theDreamer · 03-13-2012, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red6spd

Is it me or does Red_Zed seem to be involved in 99.9% of the arguments on this thread?

Just you.

Red__Zed · 03-13-2012, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780

I'm saying he says the OP was saying 20% but they were using 25%. Does it make sense now?
73 hp difference over 292 Dyno result equals 25%

Which is a 20% drivetrain loss, as he states.

tomnavone · 03-13-2012, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red6spd

Is it me or does Red_Zed seem to be involved in 99.9% of the arguments on this thread?

And its getting old real fast

red6spd · 03-13-2012, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theDreamer

Just you.

Guess your wrong.

Red__Zed · 03-13-2012, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomnavone

How many more threads can u two derail today?
2 for 2 so far

This thread is about these dyno numbers and the results claimed by the shop. Our discussion is entirely related.

theDreamer · 03-13-2012, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red6spd

Guess your wrong.

Really? You sure about that.....

03-13-2012, 06:11 PM	#48 (permalink)
Cmike2780 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Long Island Posts: 5,059 Drives: slowwww Rep Power: 28	Lol, Good god red I wasn't interpreting anything. He was referring to the original post, which I thought meant exactly what you said. The percentage increase over the Dyno number, not the 20% loss. I don't think it's even accurate way of determining actual drivetrain loss. I prefer using the rated flywheel hp, baseline Dyno and new Dyno number 332/baseline Dyno=x/new Dyno number Lol, I never said you were wrong by the way. So easy to get under your skin isn't it? __________________ [09][MB][6-Spd MT][Touring][Stillen Gen III][K&N][Borla CBE][Evo-R] [ArchitTEK Photography]

03-13-2012, 06:24 PM	#50 (permalink)
tomnavone Track Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: S.F. Bay Area Posts: 723 Drives: Supercharged 370z Rep Power: 17	How many more threads can u two derail today? 2 for 2 so far __________________ GTM Supercharger/HKS Camp2/Berk cbe/Motordyne art pipes/Hotchkis sways/ Eibach Springs/ Black Volk TE37/Bridgestone S-04 Powered by

03-13-2012, 06:50 PM	#54 (permalink)
red6spd A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Long Island NY Posts: 3,277 Drives: 2010 Z Coupe M6 SPT Rep Power: 21	Is it me or does Red_Zed seem to be involved in 99.9% of the arguments on this thread? __________________ 2010 Base+Sport 6spd: Stillen G3, FI Non-Resonated CBE, FI Non-Resonated Test Pipes, UpRev Tuned, Custom 24R Oil Cooler, JDM Rear Fog-OEM Harness. ???Whp ???WTQ (Will find out come spring time)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[FOR SALE] Nismo Exhaust - Nismo 19" Forged rays wheels.	Bleazi	Parts for sale (Private Classifieds)	12	10-16-2011 08:04 AM
wanted nismo rims for 370z and nismo stune rear spoiler	edphoenix01	New Nismo 370Z Owner	0	09-29-2010 06:44 PM
340WHP AP1 S2K 1/4 result?	leepeen	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	17	06-30-2009 12:34 PM

03-13-2012, 05:56 PM	#46 (permalink)
AlphaSnacks A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Windermere, FL Posts: 1,618 Drives: '13 XKR-S, '10 370Z Rep Power: 18	Yes, dating back to 350Zs.