![]() |
The build in question is a closed deck IPP stage 4. Aside from the closed deck and moly coated race bearings it's the same as my Stage 2 , but I paid for upgrades. The shining star of the build is the headwork and C2 cams. Also this was on Ethanol.
Also Seb I chatted up Seb and he believes that 16+ is where head lift becomes an issue, I'm gonna have a bit of faith in the L19 kit and I told him I'd like to take it to 18psi but at his discretion. So now I have to send him video of my wideband during my next pull and from there we go to map 4 and possibly 18psi. And Matt said he believes they had it at 29psi in a post. |
There is a point you reach with how much power a car can handle. Once you go beyond that point. The car is no longer fun to drive, but a handful and you're fighting it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Completely understand the logic just due to the fact that I'm probably more than a couple seconds a lap around a technical track on a 600 then I am on a literbike. With my build where it is now I'm pretty sure it's well into the 600s on map 2 and touching 700s on map 3 considering the level of boost , C2 cams, 10:1 compression and the 6870. With my Map 4 if Seb chooses to go with the 18psi that would more likely than not be a "Because it can" map. Maps 2, 3 are already E85 only maps and part of the reason for the cideo is because at WOT in 3rd I'm leary of looking at the wideband and not the road. We'll see what happens when I get him the vids.
|
I balanced that and considered what had been said prior to building. And basically I called Kyle out on it when I spoke with him. Listening to his side of the stories and then reading the people's complaints it made sense to me but thats my risk. When actually knew the other side of the story and then re read the peoples complaints it all made sense. So far my motor is humming right along and the only complaint I have is ordering Cosworth
head gaskets and them not being available. |
Quote:
Bullit's died, CarbonZ's died, Seb's first attempt died, etc. I don't care to be part of that crowd. |
He's not the kind to go out and blast around with 900 horses. I think he'll leave that one for the record books and like many of us just be happy knowing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Actually I am glad he made that much. Why, because MA's dyno reads low and folks were already asking for a Dynojet run of my car and it wasn't even finished yet. I personally don't care to go through the hassle of running the car on someone elses dyno. At the end of the day if I am happy that is all that matters.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a 17% factor Heart Breaker +17% DynoLog Dynojet 400 = 468 410 = 480 420 = 491 430 = 503 440 = 515 450 = 527 460 = 538 470 = 550 480 = 562 490 = 573 500 = 585 510 = 597 520 = 608 530 = 620 540 = 632 550 = 644 560 = 655 570 = 667 580 = 679 590 = 690 600 = 702 610 = 714 620 = 725 630 = 737 640 = 749 650 = 761 660 = 772 670 = 784 680 = 796 690 = 807 700 = 819 710 = 831 720 = 842 730 = 854 740 = 866 750 = 878 760 = 889 770 = 901 780 = 913 790 = 924 800 = 936 810 = 948 820 = 959 830 = 971 840 = 983 850 = 995 860 = 1006 870 = 1018 880 = 1030 890 = 1041 900 = 1053 Supporting info: Why Our Mainline Dyno Produces More Accurate Results Inertia Dynos - like DynoJet dynos, measure power based on the length of time it takes to "spool up" two heavy steel drums within the dyno. Horsepower numbers are much higher because they are based on distance traveled / acceleration rather than force, at least 17% higher than load bearing dynos in our experience. Cruising air / fuel ratios are generally richer because they are based on wide open throttle conditions. Load Bearing Dynos - measure power based on the force applied to the rollers when the dyno brake is applied. Loading the engine gives us the ability to hold the engine at various loads for driveability tuning and maximum fuel economy. All Mainline dynos are load bearing dynos. load bearing to inertia dyno horsepower conversion ACCURATE, DEPENDABLE, REPEATABLE RESULTS The Mainline Dyno is widely described as the "no fudge" or the "unfudgeable" dyno, and is the obvious choice for dyno operators who choose an honest approach to business and do not want to be caught up in the debacle about why the same car can get differing results on the same brand of dyno, why the same car can produce inconsistent results using different dyno "modes" or even why a dyno needs different "modes" for 4, 6 and 8 cylinder vehicles. The Mainline Dyno deserves its outstanding reputation for producing the same results from dyno to dyno, as a scientific approach has been taken that provides the highest degree of accuracy. No need for a special operating mode that reduces the ability of the operator to affect the results. No menu options for the dyno operator to "modify" results. There are definitely no cheat modes and no smoke or mirrors on the Mainline Dyno. |
Car has been delivered to MA. DC traffic is hell. Brian has a couple of vehicles to tidy up before he goes full out on mine.
It's in good hands. |
I figured you was in the process of dropping it off. Because you've been quite. :rofl2:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
Spooler, have a safe trip back home... if you aren’t back already :tiphat: Glad you had a warmed up window, to get it up the road :driving: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Fudges. I’m going to be eith my car for a long time
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Brain did not let it slip his mind that I have a 1975 280zt. He was asking me questions about it on Friday. LOL He wanted to know if I was dedicated to the L28 engine. I started laughing. I would really like an RB26 for it on a standalone. Talked with the wife about it. Already talking about another build before this one is finished. Some things to ponder for sure. One day, this will happen.
|
Quote:
|
RB swap the 370. Put the VQ in the 280.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
By the way. I won't be posting that project on the forum anyway. It will just show up at Zdayz one year.
|
Work has begun on the car. MA's not wasting any time.
|
I am having a couple of things done differently. Cause that's how we roll. You'll see in the end.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Spooler you should jump on the Ron Davis bandwagon. Cost little
More then that csf. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2