|
Originally Posted by Zemurray How you can even quantify reliability on a 2011 model car is beyond me. Those consumer reports on reliability are a joke. Measure it on a
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-01-2012, 12:30 PM
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 21   |
Quote:
 How about this. From the same guys, the 350Z over it's lifetime (2003 - 2009) got a 47 rating, the C6 vette for much of the same time (2005 -2010) is rated at a 59. Now the 370Z may be a bit more or less reliable than the 350Z but since you are the one that wants to condemn all vehicles based on some you've had, the shoe has to fit on bith feet. (I made that old saying up on the spot!) And just to show you my bias, I owned a 95 Camaro and it was the absolute worst piece of s*** ever to grace the roadways of our fine planet.
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pros cons of coupe vs. roadster | Sailorman | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 49 | 08-19-2014 07:57 AM |
| Stock Nav, pros and cons | Evil Sports | Audio & Video | 41 | 01-26-2012 01:30 AM |
| Pros/cons of most popular tires | brucelidat | Wheels & Tires | 53 | 01-12-2012 01:22 PM |
| Wheel size 20 19 18 pros and cons??? | SuPErBLuE370z | Wheels & Tires | 3 | 05-29-2011 11:45 AM |
| GMT 4.2L and 4.5L stroker kit pros and cons | Mjthind | Engine & Drivetrain | 79 | 02-14-2011 06:44 PM |
Threaded Mode
