![]() |
Originally Posted by edub370 Cayman won't go turbo. Think about it logically guys. They won't want to step on the 911's toes by doing that. Logically to achieve > 30mpg
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 362
Drives: MB Roadster (sold)
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Quote:
An S model putting out 300+ HP does not as it steps too close to base 911's which is the flagship (and has long been a problem with the Cayman S anyway...) Personally, I am curious if a Porsche engineered H4 will sound like a Porsche at that point. Thought the 944 was a fantastic handling chassis, the I4 in it was anemic at best. For the Z car, the history around the Z has been the affordable sports car. People seem to want it to be sub-super car in this thread. Why? Suggestions for more performance/less weight will drive cost up significantly. Not to pick on anyone, but an all AL frame will mean a 80K+ car. Remember the NSX? ![]() I think the A8 still is mostly AL. If it was feasible they would use it also in the A4/A6 which are the profit places for Audi but its simply not cost effective at those market levels. - b |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|