![]() |
They could go with a smaller displacement turbo V6.
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 38,517
Drives: 15 GT-R BE/09 370Z
Rep Power: 1402086 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
3.0 again? haha
![]()
__________________
324whp/258wtq AAM Tuned |F.I. NonRes CF CBE/NonRes TestPipes #373|UpRev Tuner|Akuma Motorsports Intakes|Z1 34 Row Oil Cooler |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14859 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I thought about that too. a 2.7 wouldn't be feasibly efficient for a v6 which would bring us to the tried and true 3.0 displacement. 3.2 would be the largest they,d be able to go before the engine gets too big.
My vision goes like this... A well engineered 2.4 i4 can pull 220-250hp NA, while in house turbo plumbing can bring it to 320-370hp stock, with room to expand out to 500bhp fairly inexpensively. On a 3000lb chassis, that would easily compete against a 2015 BRZ turbo, 2014 porsche cayman turbo, and the next iteration of the genesis coupe which I can see being a 380hp N/A engine with a 10 speed auto. lol Throw in a close ratio much improved 6 speed transmission,8000rpm redline and bring out the first DCT with DRM as the newest high tech installation on the Z and we're good to go. ![]() Lastly, a longer hood with our small engine pushed all the way to the back for better balanced, lower stance, lower roofline, maintain our width. Handling will increase, power will probably stay the same as now, torque will probably increase and we'd probably have a consistent 4.5 second car to 60mph and sub 13 quarters with the weight reduction. maintaining our width, reducing a little weight in the suspension and keeping our current tires widths... We should exceed the current handling statistics by a pretty big margin???? Sounds good to me. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 302
Drives: 09 370Z TourSport MT
Rep Power: 250 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Engine Ideas: - BMW still uses an inline 6 turbo making rediculous power and torque (See Series 1 M)...I would suggest Nissan consider a lighter weight inline 6 Turbo. This will not only lower the weight of the car (Perhaps 50 to 100 lbs) but it will fix the biggest issue the Z has...Weight distribution. Does it have to be inline...No but a smaller forced induced 6 would be ideal. Everyone likes big HP numbers but spinning tires does not equal performance. Power to weight ratio does. - Let's not hate on the idea of a smaller engine (I have to admit I kinda do). Look at it this way...Hyandai did one thing right...It gave 2 options. A 4 cycl and a 6. Nissan should do the same to help bring there MPG numbers up. Chasis Ideas: - The technology for affordable light wieght exists. My old car (Mazda Rx8) weighed in north of 2900 lbs and it had 2 more seats, doors, and a bigger trunk (none of which are requirements for the Z). My point is the Z still has weight to shed and using all/partial aluminum frame is feasible. I would say they should focus on making materials in the front lighter. Drivetrain: - I wish for a rear mounted tranny like the Vettes and Porsches...mmmm...but reality sucks! You dont have to do much...smaller dispacement v6 or i6 turbo and more use of Aluminum. Outcome will be a 3000 lbs car with 350 + HP with better handling. You want more torque...well a lighter car will feel like it has a crap tone more torque at the same HP/TQ numbers we have now. Throwing HP and TQ does not work if it is not engineered to fit the chasis. Now wouldn't the idea of a modern 300Z TT with the specs mentioned above be nice... ![]()
__________________
Mazda Rx8 MT Titanium - SOLD! 2009 370Z T-Sport MT Black - Takeda Intake, Swift springs, Rear Camber kit, SS B Lines, FI Exhaust, Z Speed CMAK Flywheel/Clutch Kit, Stillen Brake Cooling. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14859 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
A couple easy way's for them to shave weight... Remove the spare, and make run flats standard, and make the entire frame all aluminum while using steel where absolutely necessary. I don't think Nissan is going to shrink their wheelbase much lower than 100 inches, that's just asking for a twitchy and darty car. Nissan did not necessarily confirm that they were going smaller, but they did say they will not go larger, and intend to reduce the weight. The size of the vehicle is fine, there is plenty of ways to reduce the weight. And for the record, the V6 easily fits, they cram V6's in smaller spots. BTW, some of the costs is because they only build them in Japan.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction ![]() Last edited by SS_Firehawk; 12-11-2012 at 03:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 38,517
Drives: 15 GT-R BE/09 370Z
Rep Power: 1402086 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
324whp/258wtq AAM Tuned |F.I. NonRes CF CBE/NonRes TestPipes #373|UpRev Tuner|Akuma Motorsports Intakes|Z1 34 Row Oil Cooler |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 76,801
Drives: N/A
Rep Power: 141521 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
i think technology is the key here... this next gen 4 banger could be nothing like the 4bangers we've seen in the past. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Since when did Caymans and BRZ's magically get turbo's when they are brand new with no plans to add them?
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Huntsville,AL
Posts: 1,724
Drives: '12 370Z PW 6sp
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Since 2014...
2014 Porsche Cayman Turbo - Top Speed BRZ Will Finally Get Factory Turbo Power in 2014 - Autoholics
__________________
Tomei|Berk|Takeda|ZSpeed|Fortune Auto|Swift|Eibach|SPL|Carbotech|Motul|Powertrix|Stillen|Aerojacket|Z1|Forgestar|Enkei|Project Kics|Nismo Ti|Llumar
speedfreek's journal |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4211 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 (permalink) |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
There is one recurring theme I see here... RUMORS. Why in the blue hell will Porsche put turbo's on their entry level vehicle when they have the 911, 911 turbo, 911 GT2, 911 GT3, 911 GT3 RS. I don't see them breaking their price and performance model when they can up sell them if the customer wants more. With both vehicles, I'm all for seeing them with more, but at this time, I don't think we will see them come from the factory with turbo's for a while.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 (permalink) |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: orange county,ca
Posts: 652
Drives: leased base z...
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
![]()
Hey guys I was wondering if you guys wanna get some signatures from everyone on this website that regardless of what Nissan does with the next gen z, please take care of their quality control for their paint standards.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2011
Location: KCMO
Posts: 3,458
Drives: 09 370z S/T 6MT
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Cayman won't go turbo. Think about it logically guys. They won't want to step on the 911's toes by doing that.
__________________
09 370Z ST 6MT//Injen CAI//Greddy CBE//TP//TSW's//Swifts//Stillen lip//Whiteline sways 326whp/268tq ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|