Official Crappy Parkers Thread

[JARblue]

Originally Posted by Haboob

The Lambo owner wasn't preventing the Jeep guy from doing anything, so he wasn't entitled to park like that.

Excuse me? He was preventing the Jeep from parking there. Sorry but that's a douche move. I don't think the Jeep driver was entitled to park like that; I'm saying your argument could be seen by the Jeep driver as feeling entitled to park like that.

Originally Posted by Haboob

Sure, it isn't right to park taking up two spots, but the Jeep is entirely at fault for being a ******* prick and preventing the other owner from entering and leaving.

Talk about a conflicting statement lol ... if it isn't right to take up two spots, then how is the Jeep driver ENTIRELY at fault? Even if you don't think the Lambo driver is a douche, that doesn't absolve him of fault

Originally Posted by Haboob

What I'm saying is defending my property.

Pulling the Jeep's valve cores after he parked like that and walked away is not defending your property. It's called petty retaliation

Look, we all know that parking like a douche is potentially drawing attention to your vehicle. So if you were the Lambo owner and decided to park like that, you have to know that there's a possibility of someone fucking with your car. You were the first douche, so for you to say they shouldn't mess with your car but then say you are entitled to fuck with their car in retaliation, that's the definition of a hypocrite.