Quote:
Originally Posted by Haboob
Nothing hypocritical about it.
|
lol it is the very definition of the word ... IF you are suggesting that the first person
should not be a douche, but if they are the second person
should be a douche
My point is you either advocate for non-douchery or you advocate douchery. The Lambo guy was a douche for parking like that in that parking lot (i.e. lots of cars). So he was the first douche. And according to your argument below, the Jeep was
entitled to park like a douche
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haboob
I was saying that the Jeep guy could have left a note, rather than preventing the Lambo owner from getting into his car and leaving, but, because he did so, the Lambo driver would be entitled to prevent the Jeep owner from leaving by removing a valve core or something.
|
You have an inherent right to defend yourself and your property. But you do not have the right to mess with someone's property in petty retaliation
The Lambo should not have parked like that. The Jeep should not have parked like that. About the only thing anyone here is
entitled to is the Lambo driver possibly having the Jeep towed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haboob
Eye for an eye.
|
Also, eye for an eye is such crap. $hit happens. Either get over it or do something about it. And if I wanted to do something, I would go way further than eye for an eye. If someone dings my door, I would prefer to beat the snot out of them while scolding them for damaging other people's property. Make it so painful that they pay close attention to their actions in the future. Putting a door ding in their car (eye for an eye) isn't likely to have much impact on their future actions. Just my
