![]() |
Originally Posted by MoulaZ Couple of personal observations & questions mate. 1. Are you on a hybrid MAF/SD tune or SD only? If SD only, MAFs having an issue is
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 550
Drives: '11 SC Blue 7AT
Rep Power: 3368 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
1a. I have the Omni 4-bar sensor recommended by Seb for this application in the stock MAP sensor location, back driver's side of the manifold. 2/3. Looking in to straight speed density. 4. The only issue with that is the running really rich if you send the higher-flow signal to the ecu. Since flow is not balanced, you really need the average flow from both branches for it to be accurate. Could splicing the wires together cause damage since the voltages would not be equal? Once you get into electronics that small, even small voltage irregularities where they are not supposed to be can be bad. 5. I didn't really look into the logs until now since the car seemed to be running fine. The MAF disparity existed even while the car was running fine under previous tunes, which is weird. I'm thinking that maybe the increased airflow from the 9lb pulley and the Si trim impeller may have caused the greater disparity and therefore made the car perform worse? 6. How did you find the tear? I am trying to avoid tearing down if possible... Trust me, I ill not hesitate to do what must be done, I just feel like an air leak happening all of the time would show in the car idling higher or something like that. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|