![]() |
Running 18k up front and may go up to 20k but I am an autocross sea urchin. The nice thing about Fortunes is they have a crazy range of rate
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 646
Drives: Poor man's Porsche
Rep Power: 544 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Running 18k up front and may go up to 20k but I am an autocross sea urchin.
![]() The nice thing about Fortunes is they have a crazy range of rate they can take before needing to be re-valved. Plus or minus 8k or so. If you get them be sure to pick up some bump stops and helper springs. Helper springs will really help with allowing the car to drive nicely on the street with higher main spring rates as they allow you to keep a good amount of droop. Bump stops will allow you go low without the risk of slapping chassis or having the tire rub the fender/bumper bracket. Springs are easy to change. Get a good starting point and then learn what you like or dislike and make appropriate changes based on how the tires heat up and wear and how the car is driving. As for divorced (oem type) vs true, I don't think it matters too much. I run divorced style cause of the da rules. Going true type changes the motion ratio so it will require you to run much softer springs in the rear. I would start at 16k front and then depending on the rear coilover type you go with 14k for oem/divorced rear and maybe 5k rear if you true style. that will put you on the lower side of 2 hertz front and rear (2.2fr/2.1rr give or take a .02 or so depending on how heavy your wheels and brakes etc are) Cheers, and remember, don't stress too much on getting it "right". Chances are wherever you start will be wrong. Spend more time learning how to understand what changes will do to affect how the car handles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: woodland hills
Posts: 600
Drives: z34
Rep Power: 8369 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
thanks again for everything |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: woodland hills
Posts: 600
Drives: z34
Rep Power: 8369 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
btw your z looks insane with those 305's in the front. are they ze 40's? what do you think about BC series ER? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 646
Drives: Poor man's Porsche
Rep Power: 544 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Bc, fortune, feal etc I don't think it matters too much. As long as what you get is serviceable (preferably in the USA) and allows you to change spring rate, it's fine. The only reason I went with fortune was because of the wide range of spring tolerance. I'm sure there are pros to the other brands but that's why I chose mine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: woodland hills
Posts: 600
Drives: z34
Rep Power: 8369 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I’ll be calling bc tomorrow and fortune auto Gonna weigh out some options, liking the er series and 510’s are also looking good I think I’m going to go with the 16/14 combo but my mind changes back and forth. Main concern is I don’t want to induce understeer, and have a hotchkis up front |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: DC
Posts: 26
Drives: 2016 370Z Nismo Tech
Rep Power: 11 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
FWIW, I had Fortune Auto 510s on my last Z, and was quite satisfied for the price. The current owner just sent the dampers in for their first service, 5 years in, at a cost of $300. On that car I ran only about 60% of the spring rates that I do now, but FA should be able to set it up however you like.
__________________
2016 Nismo 370Z | SCCA STU Autocross Build WIP 2015 GT-R Black Edition | Sold 2006 350Z SCCA STU prepped | Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: woodland hills
Posts: 600
Drives: z34
Rep Power: 8369 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
still in between bc's and fortune autos |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: DC
Posts: 26
Drives: 2016 370Z Nismo Tech
Rep Power: 11 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Technically speaking, too stiff in the front relative to the rear does induce undertsteer. My point is just that these cars rotate pretty happily, so that shouldn't be a major concern when deciding between differences in springrates, as long as you're in a reasonable range. 16k/18k fronts would need a really really low rear number to be problematic in that sense beyond what you can just fix with shock adjustments, and you can always change spring rates later.
__________________
2016 Nismo 370Z | SCCA STU Autocross Build WIP 2015 GT-R Black Edition | Sold 2006 350Z SCCA STU prepped | Sold |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| fortune auto 500 | ED's Dream | Brakes & Suspension | 20 | 12-14-2018 10:39 PM |
| Fortune Auto Sale | OptionZero | Brakes & Suspension | 0 | 11-22-2017 03:14 PM |
| Fortune Auto 500 Air Piston | SyndicateZ | Brakes & Suspension | 1 | 08-02-2017 04:18 AM |
| Fortune Auto 500 Review | HapaZ | Brakes & Suspension | 5 | 02-24-2017 07:51 PM |
| Fortune Auto Coilovers - Who's got them? | Sh0velMan | Brakes & Suspension | 24 | 12-21-2014 11:49 PM |