![]() |
Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370 The 350z's competition was only really the mustang. Sure. There certainly weren't options like the Honda S2000 or the Mazda RX8. I feel like Pontiac may
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sure.
There certainly weren't options like the Honda S2000 or the Mazda RX8. I feel like Pontiac may have been selling something during that timeframe too...GTO? All this to say nothing of the cars that would realistically be cross-shopped, notably the EVO, STI, GTI, R32, and things like a slightly used 4th gen camaro. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Rule one. Do not make the media's job hard. Do not release a boring vehicle. The 350Z got great late-lifecycle reviews against the mustang because Nissan added power and changed the game. The 370Z gets worse reviews than it may deserve (or maybe gets a fair review, who knows) because the media wants a horse race and Nissan's behind. Do you remember in the 90s when MT and C&D were pitting the RX7 against the viper? Do you remember when that same RX7 was wiping the floor with the much-hyped NSX? The media ate it up...the car could do no wrong. The 5.0 is much the same now...not as extreme, but when was the last time a 30K car left license plate imprints in an M3s bumper? Nothing sells better than a story like that, and I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a car that looked better in print than a 3rd gen RX7. But wait, why did it get killed off after just 3 years? 1978: 19,299 1979: 54,853 1980: 43,731 1981: 43,418 1982: 48,889 1983: 52,514 1984: 55,696 1985: 53,810 1986: 56,243 1987: 38,345 1988: 27,814 1989: 16,249 1990: 9,743 1991: 6,986 1992: 6,006 1993: 5062 it didn't sell. You'll note the dramatic lack of anything interesting out of Mazda for a while after. Sure, the price was creeping and times were changing, but there's not been a car that fared better in print than the 3rd gen RX7. The problem is, as always, fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders trumps all. Don't sell, get cut. Quote:
Yes, we all know you love the gen coupe. I don't agree with your assessment of the Gen vs the V6 mustang though. I've autocrossed both, and the mustang is way faster. I seem to recall the V6 mustang putting over a second on the gencoupe during the lightning lap, despite spending a good chunk of time bouncing off the limiter.... |
||||
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
The FC to FD price difference was massive. They essentially moved the entire car upmarket. How do you think the BRZ would do if after five years or so they changed the starting price to $35,000? Even if it was a handling miracle, the old fanbase would be removed from the market and they'd have to start entirely from scratch. Likewise, that same market was highly competitive in the early 90s. I agree though -- if a car doesn't sell it won't continue to be produced. I also disagree with the idea that the Z's problem is that the media doesn't love it enough. But I don't believe it wasn't hyped enough at launch, or that it was launched poorly (media wise), or anything like that. I think the timeframe of the launch was poor. They released a sports car into a market that was in recession. I think it was that decision that doomed the car. Outside of enthusiasts (a shrinking market to begin with), who the hell is going to buy a sports car with no practicality whatsoever during such a shitty economic time? We're basically repeating the 1990s, except Nissan is the only real Japanese sports car name in town. The Z is going up in price, yet has nothing new to offer. the GT-R -- once a realistic supercar -- is now out of reach for most of us. At $70,000, I thought maybe one day I could possibly own one if everything went okay. At 100 grand? I might as well be thinking about a Ferrari. I'll never be able to afford that, nor could I ever justify that much on a car. The only bonus? If we really are in the 90s again, it'll only be a few years before we get some great hot hatches and compacts (though it'll be the Americans carrying the banner this time). You're right, though -- poor sales meant it wasn't getting a big refresh. But the car was sort of destined to flop from the moment it was released. As it stands now, Nissan's smartest move would be to discontinue the Z for a few years and then bring it back as a 25k 240z. But hell, even then they sort of missed the bus, as I think all the manufacturers chasing Subaru/Toyota are going to be playing a useless game of catch up. Last edited by nuTinmuch; 03-01-2013 at 01:44 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is the best BBK for my Ford Mustang 5.0? | blue660r01 | Other Vehicles | 13 | 01-30-2012 07:28 PM |
| 1,400 hp Ford GT | Crazy8 | Other Vehicles | 3 | 03-20-2010 03:17 PM |
| Ford WTF | bigaudiofanat | The Lounge (Off Topic) | 36 | 11-25-2009 10:28 AM |
| White House approves green car loans for Tesla, Ford, Nissan | SoCal 370Z | The Lounge (Off Topic) | 11 | 06-25-2009 02:14 PM |
| Ford Focus RS Tops Nissan GT-R In "Real World" Test | AK370Z | Other Vehicles | 23 | 05-07-2009 09:35 PM |