![]() |
Originally Posted by theDreamer But you are missing the point, it is not about price but warranty. By not having the oil cooler stock, Nissan is showing/stating they do not
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,188
Drives: 370z MB 6mt
Rep Power: 916 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4212 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
But it is not just the oil issue of the warranty, Nissan clearly does not want the car on the track even as stock, now Robert makes a good point in who says that is what Nissan intends. But I would feel that marketing of the product towards "competition suspension" and other parts makes one wonder who they are hoping buys this. Now would I leave my car stock? Wrong person to ask because this is my first sports car and the power currently is more than I need so I would leave it completely stock without a question.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Middle TN/Savannah GA
Posts: 762
Drives: '14 Q60IPL/'14Armada
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
It's all well and good to say the law is on the consumer's side but if a manufacturer takes the position that an aftermarket addition, especially anything used for "off road" use (i.e. track use) precipitated or could have precipitated a failure and they refuse warranty coverage then the consumer is left with what is likely to be a real headache and may well mean heading for the court room...very few consumers have the time, inclination or financial resources to sue a manufacturer under that statute and if they did, their Z would likely have become a "classic" by the time the case was adjudicated even assuming it was a victory for the consumer. If anyone says that adding aftermarket performance parts will "automatically" void your warranty that simply isn't true...by the same token, anyone claiming that resolving a dispute between the consumer and the manufacturer is simple, quick or easy is also not likely true and I'd suggest that any evidence that a vehicle was put on a race track would likely result in making a warranty claim even more difficult.
__________________
Robert -My Basset Hound Is Smarter Than Your Honor Student and Barack Obama - Last edited by Robert_Nash; 07-20-2009 at 05:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Airport Nissan Photoshoot (Z33 NISMO, Z34 NISMO, R35 GTR) | HKYStormFront | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 58 | 01-30-2010 11:10 AM |
| Nismo and Nismo S-tune confusion | phantom21 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 16 | 09-20-2009 09:38 AM |
| NISMO 370Z at Gunn Nissan vs 350Z NISMO pics side-by-side | NIZMOZ | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 34 | 07-07-2009 09:10 AM |