![]() |
Originally Posted by theDreamer What is the bylaw they found to get it into the races? The rule state the car must be in production to race, but this car
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North East
Posts: 6,203
Drives: 09 370Z Sport M6
Rep Power: 655 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The loophole is that they can state that the car is a continuation of an existing or previous road going model, doesn't seem to matter how different the car is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4212 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I thought about that later, but then in my mind it is a completely different vehicle from the ground up. If they kept the engine placement (mid-engine) or something I could see the argument, but this car is nothing like the original NSX.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 382
Drives: 09 370z PG M6
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
The loophole if i understand correctly was that the car had to be production READY, in which it is. Apparently nowhere in the rules does it say the car actually has to be in production.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DannyGT's Journal/Progress | DannyGT | Member's 370Z Gallery | 174 | 10-17-2017 10:25 AM |
| RCZ's 370Z Journal. | RCZ | Member's 370Z Gallery | 1743 | 08-09-2013 11:55 PM |
| Edmonton Journal Review of the 370Z | BanningZ | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 13 | 08-09-2009 05:44 PM |