![]() |
Bushmaster, DPMS, CMMG, Olympic Arms....these are all generally considered to be lower tier rifles. This is objectively based on the materials used in their construction, the level of QA, and observation of failure rates in high round-count situations. Subjectively, people who shoot a lot and have experience with these brands wouldn't have one. As a budget range toy, that you can take out, show your buddies your new "Army rifle" shoot a couple of hundred rounds a year then put back in the closet, those lower tier rifles can be perfectly fine. You just wouldn't want to bet your life on one. The difficult part is that in many cases you'll pay as much for a DPMS or Bushmaster as you will for a Colt. For my part, there are several brands that I own or have owned and that I'm a fan of. My suspicion about Bushmaster and its ilk is based on lots of shooting, lots of hanging around guys who shoot, many instructional carbine courses from nationally known instructors. I've heard what they say, and I've seen those rifles break in courses when they're put to the test. There are a lot of DPMS rifles around here (DPMS HQ is about 60 miles from here). Like I said...range toy?...have at it. Gonna bet your life on that rifle or take pride in owning demonstrably high-quality firerarms?...get one that's well made and reliable. Me? I'm inclined to buy the best quality I can afford. I buy my tools from Snap-On, not Harbor Freight.
Go over to M4Carbine.net and do a search (use the orange search button in the top header) on Bushmaster, or Rock River Arms, or DPMS. |
@BlackZeda - How many rounds have you put through your Bushmasters since MacCool mentioned reliability issues when used a lot?
|
Quote:
The Bolt Carrier Group (BCG) was upgraded by one from FailZero, and before that I replaced the bolt itself once because of the carbon build-up. To me I view that as regular maintenance aside from scraping. I have found that lubing it after 200 rounds will keep it running well without any issues. Also after any shooting session I will clean my firearms. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Longevity and reliability of a rifle like the AR15 is truly variable from brand to brand. A lot of people, in defending their DPMS etc rifle, will report that it's a real "tack driver". I don't understand the opinion that accuracy equals quality. The AR15 isn't a precision weapon and accuracy has nothing to do with reliability, which is the main thing one wants in a combat weapon. The weak spot in the consumer grade rifles tends to be the BCG, especially the bolt, gas key, and extractor and this is made worse by the well-known tendency for those rifles to be overgassed. That leads to more heat, more violent action of the BCG, more stress, more likely failure of those parts, especially the extractor, bolt, and gas rings, and also the receiver extension. Catastrophic failure is rare, but less rare in upper tier rifles where the BCG and bolt are proof-fired and magnafluxed. Other issues with rifles like the Bushmaster are their adherence to specs. I don't disagree that a Bushmaster or RRA that doesn't have issues with feeding, or an overly tight chamber, and does have proper staking of the gas key, and whose frame is in-spec is probably OK, but mfgrs like Noveske do more quality testing and have stricter tolerance standards and your odds of buying a reliable rifle are substantially increased. Because they test and throw away a higher percentage of their parts, the cost goes up in favor of a rifle that will work better for longer. The other issue with the lower tier rifles is the steel they use in their barrels, that nature of the rifling, the forging method, and the quality of the bore lining. 4140 steel just doesn't hold up as long as 4150. Not likely an issue in a rifle that's going to see 3000 rounds over several years, but after 15000 rounds, you're going to see an issue. Those consumer-grade rifle mfgrs feel more confident in relaxing their spec requirments on that stuff because the vast majority of shooters just aren't going to shoot them enough for the weak spots to manifest themselves. Now, one could say that your average non-professional shooter doesn't need the level of quality and reliability that Noveske, or BCM, or DD, or Colt, or LMT builds into their rifles, and that's probably true, but a lot of it depends on what you expect from your firearms. Personally, I am inclined to go with professional grade and I go out of my way to buy firearms that are top level. I don't do that because I expect I'll have to use it someday to defend my family from the advancing hoards and I'll never (I hope) have to take my firearms into combat, but as a point of pride or whatever, I want firearms that are designed for that purpose anyway. I'm not a professional carpenter, but I buy Milwaukee drills instead of Black and Decker. I'm not a professional mechanic, but I buy my wrenches from Snap-On or MAC, not Chinese imports from Harbor Freight. 2000 rounds over three days is a lot of shooting. Most courses are less than that, maybe between 1000-1500 rounds. And most people aren't going to take 2 or 3 of those a year like I do. But I go to courses where people are shooting Bushmasters, RRA, etc, and when stressed with repeated courses of fire of multiple mags in only a few minutes, I see them fail with enough regularity that I have always resolved to have a good enough rifle that I never have to worry about being that guy. As a range plinker, those lower-tier rifles may well be good enough for most people, but I am utterly convinced of the differences between Bushmaster/DPMS/RRA/Oly/Armalite and Colt/Noveske/DD/LMT/BCM, and I wouldn't go that direction, especially when one looks at the cost differences. In most cases, you may only see ~$200 price difference between a given Bushmaster and a BCM outfitted similarly. I cannot recommend instructional carbine courses highly enough. The amount that you will learn about function, maintenance, manual of arms, and shooting skill is vast. Even if you're not a professional gunfighter, you've chosen to own a combat weapon. I have found it very gratifying to learn how to use it in the manner and for the purpose for which it was designed even if I'll never have to use it for that purpose. Some guys like golf and spend a fortune on clubs, instruction, and greens fees even though they'll never play in a tourament in their lives. I don't golf. I'm a medical consultant for the Sheriff's Department, mainly Tac Team and Bomb Squad, and have been for more than 16 years. I have to train with them, and I have to shoot with them to the same standards required of the deputies. We do monthly training and twice-a-year range qualifications with all of the weapons. No doubt my attitudes have been shaped by association with those highly professional law enforcement officers, and are different than your average firearms buyer. So, my opinions may well be over-the-top. But I keep coming back to the cost differential between the various tiers of weapons. You don't have to spend twice as much to get a rifle that is twice as good. Sorry for the long rant. |
noob question, but do i use grease or oil? i don't intend to shoot really often, so i was leaning towards grease as lubricant. any ideas / tips?
|
Phelan I use motor oil. I have a few quarts of Redline 5w-20 left over from my Z that I use as gun lube now. 3 quarts will last me a LONG time!
|
okay, thanks
i've built a small list of what i need, but basically: bore snake break free lubricant (i have some oil too, but i think i can grab some grease at work as well) + syringe wire brush nylon brush is that it? ooh...cotton patches? |
Quote:
Firearm lubrication opinions are as controversial and as full of snake oil as automobile lubrication. IMHO, a lot of the same concepts apply. The theoretical problem with grease is that is is more likely to attract and especially hold dirt, sand, and grit than oil and act as an abrasive that will then increase friction and actually wear parts faster than normal. The problem with semi automatic firearms is that there is a lot of heat and pressure on the moving parts. Grease is an attractive option for that reason. I think there's merit to both arguments but I'm inclined to use oil, not grease and I prefer synthetic preparations. I tend to use Slip 2000 EWL or MachineGunner's Lube, but I agree with Mustang that a good synthetic engine oil is probably every bit as good, and certainly a lot cheaper. When my current bottle of Slip 2000 is empty, I think I'm going to fill it back up with Mobil 1 20w40. |
dude you can grab syringes at work? lol grab me some 1ml, 2ml, and 5ml :P
|
I think i'll have to go with the higher tier stuff when it comes to an AR15 then...i like to shoot a lot. Not as much as Mac but I'm expecting to shoot about 1000 a month, just like the handgun
|
weird I thought I replied here. MacCool I'm cleaning my handgun - a Beretta PX4. I'm leaning towards using some 5w30 oil I have for now, and maybe switch it up later. But I'm open to thoughts and suggestions on what I absolutely need to clean the gun properly.
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Also these polymer picks are great for cleaning the rails and other hard to reach places :tup:
I fold up a patch and start working at the tight areas using the picks Amazon.com: Tipton Polymer Gun Cleaning Picks: Sports & Outdoors |
Quote:
I have decided that before the course I am going to slap on a LMT gas-piston monolithic upper on my Bushmaster lower. The idea of a gas-piston AR is intriguing and if anyone can do it right it would have to be LMT. Of course I will have my Noveske as a backup/alternate just in case... If for some reason you were to consider a Bushmaster, don't buy one that isn't made in Windham Maine as those I believe where the ones that were subject to lapses in quality control. Oh, if I were in the market for a complete AR I would strongly consider LaRue Tactical, Daniel's Defense and LWRC as well. At the end of the year I will be looking at getting a .308 which I will be looking at LaRue Tactical, LWRC and Noveske AR-10s or possibly an Accuracy International bolt action. The gun store that has a shooting range I go to has a .50 BMG AI with a killer scope for the bargain price of $20K. It is a mouth-watering sight! |
i think the most confusing part of getting into all this is the cleaning / maintenance :facepalm:
i was told using Q-tips was generally a bad idea...but i'll assemble my amazon shopping list and post it up here later on for some feedback. help would be aprpeciated :tup: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hoppe's BoreSnake, 9mm
These look good and aren't too expensive: Amazon.com: Otis Variety Pack Receiver Brushes (Nylon, Blue Nylon, Bronze): Sports & Outdoors Do I need this? Amazon.com: Break-Free CLP-4 Cleaner Lubricant Preservative Squeeze Bottle (4 -Fluid Ounce): Sports & Outdoors and no 9, or maybe some mobil 1? lol Hoppe's No. 9 Solvent this stuff is kinda expensive O_O |
just FYI...ive heard that Hoppe's #9 kinda smells so make sure you're in a well ventilated area lol
and I bought that brush set, they work pretty well some people use an old toothbrush too and said it works |
kinda want this just for the mat lol: Amazon.com: Gunslick Pro Roll-Up Gun Cleaning Mat: Sports & Outdoors
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I spilled a big bottle of Hoppes #9 on my living room carpet once. :bowrofl:
|
Quote:
:icon17: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
My Beretta Px4 Storm.
|
Quote:
we gotta schedule some range time for when phelan gets his |
o0o0o0 i want to play! ill post pics of my Springfield TRP 1911, custom Glock 19, and my Siaga SGL-21 (AK47). Once i get home!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i'm picking up thursday but like i said, i need some cleaning supplies (anybody wanna let me borrow some for now?)
i want to clean the px4 before i fire it |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2