Just finished my first set of tires. Suggest a replacement.

Scribe

I have to say I like the stock tires and summer tires are decent in Houston, but when it rains here, it pours and that can be a little scary.

At this point, I'm looking to replace the stock tires with the same exact tires but wanted to ask my fellow Z lovers if they have had any experience with tires they would consider to be comparable in performance, but possibly last longer than 16K miles and/or have maybe slightly better wet traction. Looking at the other thread, the NT05 seems to be pretty popular. I'm looking for their treadwear rating, available sizes (want stock) etc.

Thanks for your input!

[Later, that following weekend]

Well, after researching a bit, I decided to go with the Hankook Ventus Evo 12 in stock size. The stock Bridgestones are rated at 140AA. The Hankooks are rated 300AA, which should, in theory give me longer life. The tread pattern should also give me slightly better wet traction, with channels running diagnally out to the outer edges.


Inital thoughts: The tire does not look as 'stretched' as the stock tires, even at the same size (See attached, blurry-as-hell image). It does ride quiter and more comfortably than my worn-to-death (well, 3/32) stock Potenzas.

(LATER UPDATE) Despite some heavy rain today, I found that driving is far less scary than on the stock Potenzas. It's nothing to write home about, just a good improvement when driving across wet roads. If you've ever found that driving on wet roads makes you just a tad nervous, I can recomend the Hankook Ventus V12s.

Attached Images

IMG_0386.jpg (690.5 KB, 48 views)

Caravanshaka

There are a lot of tire threads here. RE-11 for better traction is the general consensus. As for longer wear and great rain traction I'd suggest the hankook ventus V12's.

__________________
____________________ PROJECT DiaD - Sold but not forgotten!
The first testicular guard, the "Cup," was used in Hockey in 1874 and the first helmet was used in 1974. That means it only took 100 years for men to realize that in order to work the penis, the brain must remain whole.

FuszNissan

Me like NT05's

__________________
Mods: Too Many to list!
LouFuszNissan
ZDAYZ 2012

schnabdt

I just went with the Kumho Ecsta SPT yesterday. Good looking tire with similar price to the Hankook's. Got em off tire rack and the reviews on them seemed pretty solid.

I only needed the rears and got over 20,000 miles on the OE tires which I was pretty happy about considering my driving style.

ChrisSlicks

I used the SPT's on my Infiniti and they were pretty good for a 300TW tire. Did well in the wet, not as sticky as stock.

The NT05 and RE-11 are the stickiest and fastest wearing street tire options, and are also going to be the worst performing in heavy downpour situations.

Scribe

Thanks to everyone for their replies. I'll update with what I buy and a review.

FuszNissan

I can attest to this. Not meant for everyday driving. Nice weather tires.

__________________
Mods: Too Many to list!
LouFuszNissan
ZDAYZ 2012

RCZ

NT-05 or RE-11 = win

Scribe

Well, after researching a bit, I decided to go with the Hankook Ventus Evo 12 in stock size. The stock Bridgestones are rated at 140AA. The Hankooks are rated 300AA, which should, in theory give me longer life. The tread pattern should also give me slightly better wet traction, with channels running diagnally out to the outer edges.


Inital thoughts: The tire does not look as 'stretched' as the stock tires, even at the same size (See attached, blurry-as-hell image on the first image). It does ride quiter and more comfortably than my worn-to-death (well, 3/32) stock Potenzas.

ZPirate

I've been looking at the Hankook Ventus Evo K110s for my new Volk Racing G2s. I thought the treadwear rating was 280 though.

Anyway from what I have seen the reviews on these tires have been mostly very good (although there seem to be some who have them who don't like them), especially for the price. And with double the treadwear rating of the OEM Bridgestones it seems like a no brainer to me.

__________________
2003 Daytona Blue 350Z Touring/Nismo
2009 Platinum Graphite 370Z Touring/Sport (Sold)
2009 BMW 135i/Dinan Stage 2 software upgrade/M3 suspension piecies/Koni Sports/ETS FMIC/Alufelgen SF-71 wheels

NXTAZEE

Have a look at Potenza RE760 sport. Looks like a step up from our stock tires. The treadwear is a lot better and traction is the same, 340-A-A. Looks like they might be quite a bit quieter as well.

__________________
2010 Carbon Silver 370Z 7AT charcoal int. sports package | Clear Bra | Invidia Gemini CBE | CF B-Pillars | CF Fangs | CF Z emblems | Swift Springs | 20mm & 25mm Spacers | SPC Camber Arms | Brushed Aluminum shift knob

370zproject

what is the price on those tires?

Chriz

From what I hear, Ventus v12 evo's are great for their price considering their treadwear and traction. Rated (AA) According to tire rack they are 161 for fronts and 199 for rear. I also remember a car and driver tire review where it got second.

__________________
PW 7AT w/Sports Pkg
Hook Em!

ZPirate

Thanks for the C&D review info. I'll look in my back issues for it. Now that you mention it I remember C&D doing a tire review in the last several months, but I can't remember how it went.

And yes the Hankook Ventus V12 Evos are very reasonably priced. The 255/35/19 and 295/30/19s I need for my G2s are approximately $850 shipped from the TireRack.

__________________
2003 Daytona Blue 350Z Touring/Nismo
2009 Platinum Graphite 370Z Touring/Sport (Sold)
2009 BMW 135i/Dinan Stage 2 software upgrade/M3 suspension piecies/Koni Sports/ETS FMIC/Alufelgen SF-71 wheels

shumby

piolts.


you can close the thread now

__________________
Originally Posted by SAM@GTM
Engine detonation is not normal and it should never never happen, and whoever told that need to do something else for living .
Sam