![]() |
Autox Z has done pretty well at Nats the past few years, and they were hardly anything that favored a 370z. You just have to look at CSP to see
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 536
Drives: 03 350z 6mt
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Autox Z has done pretty well at Nats the past few years, and they were hardly anything that favored a 370z. You just have to look at CSP to see how friendly they have been to the smaller cars...
Sounds like it may be skill of the driver that is causing the bigger separation than you like... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
That's absolutely true. That said, if you were to see the courses @ at least one of the venues the texas region of SCCA does their Solo II events at, you'd understand what I mean. There are no straights at all to use the extra power and most of the turns are such tight radius you have to creep around them. My solution was to not go to SCCA events anymore, problem solved. Anyhoo, good luck to the OP! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| help with SCCA track classification please | chrischhorn | Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip | 19 | 10-03-2013 05:25 PM |
| AMP Classification | BobQ | Audio & Video | 10 | 03-15-2010 10:46 PM |