Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Photography (http://www.the370z.com/photography/)
-   -   DSLR Shots and Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/photography/40346-dslr-shots-discussions.html)

kazman 03-19-2014 12:09 PM

Here are some of the stats that I would look at to help you decide, since your first starting out.

Canon 60D
- $1,200 with lens kit
- 18 MP
- 5.3 fps shooting
- 1080 HD video
- * 3" movable LCD NON-touchscreen
- 9 autofocus points
- full frame ... Easiest way to describe this is... if you use a 100mm lens on this camera, you will be able to see more of an area then you would if you used a 100mm lens on a NON full frame camera. If this camera and a NON full frame took the same pic with the same lens, the NON full frame pic would look cropped in comparison to this full frame.


Canon Rebel T5i
- $850 with lens kit
- 18 MP
- 5.0 fps shooting
- 1080 HD video
- * 3" movable LCD TOUCHSCREEN
- 9 autofocus points


Nikon D5300
- $895 with lens kit
- 24.2 MP
- 5.0 fps shooting
- 1080 HD video
- * 3.2" movable LCD NON-touchscreen
- *wifi capability
- switch between 9 / 21/ 39 autofocus points

saber 03-19-2014 12:24 PM

Full-frame also, to me, is less noisy than a crop sensor. But who am I to say? I have the D7000 and I adore it. I'm a Nikon user and I usually tell beginners that the D5X00 is a great place to start, with plenty of good glass to support. You can definitely grow and kick on from it, or if you're just dabbling it's a good day-to-day camera that won't be overly cumbersome or difficult to get to settings you need.

kazman 03-19-2014 12:44 PM

i went back and underlined the main features of each that stand out against the rest.

the full frame is def. desired by some people
the touchscreen is pretty sweet, and a good price for that camera
the 24.2 MP is awesome, and wifi is just very convenient.

My thoughts. Canon Rebel T5i. Rebels always get awesome reviews for beginners. The difference in price from it and the Canon 60D is +/- $300. Take that money and go buy another lens for it. For example this lens. The canon 40mm f2.8. While it does NOT zoom, its going to be very sharp and five you a very nice blurry background!

Doing that ^ gives you the Rebel T5i, 2 lens ( 1 zoom lens and one really sharp lens ) at the same price of the canon 60D with just one standard zoom lens.

Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM | Canon Online Store

heres a sample photo taken with the 40mm f2.8 - not my photo, taken on a rebel t4i

http://www.flickr.com/photos/amitmalik21/9942482813/

Meulen 03-19-2014 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kazman (Post 2743697)
Here are some of the stats that I would look at to help you decide, since your first starting out.

Canon 60D
- $1,200 with lens kit
- 18 MP
- 5.3 fps shooting
- 1080 HD video
- * 3" movable LCD NON-touchscreen
- 9 autofocus points
- full frame ... Easiest way to describe this is... if you use a 100mm lens on this camera, you will be able to see more of an area then you would if you used a 100mm lens on a NON full frame camera. If this camera and a NON full frame took the same pic with the same lens, the NON full frame pic would look cropped in comparison to this full frame.


Canon Rebel T5i
- $850 with lens kit
- 18 MP
- 5.0 fps shooting
- 1080 HD video
- * 3" movable LCD TOUCHSCREEN
- 9 autofocus points


Nikon D5300
- $895 with lens kit
- 24.2 MP
- 5.0 fps shooting
- 1080 HD video
- * 3.2" movable LCD NON-touchscreen
- *wifi capability
- switch between 9 / 21/ 39 autofocus points

I'm sure you're listing retail there for an apples to apples comparison, but FYI I got my T5i for $450 on cyber monday!:happydance:

Cmike2780 03-19-2014 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kazman (Post 2743697)
Here are some of the stats that I would look at to help you decide, since your first starting out.

Canon 60D
- $1,200 with lens kit
- 18 MP
- 5.3 fps shooting
- 1080 HD video
- * 3" movable LCD NON-touchscreen
- 9 autofocus points
- full frame ... Easiest way to describe this is... if you use a 100mm lens on this camera, you will be able to see more of an area then you would if you used a 100mm lens on a NON full frame camera. If this camera and a NON full frame took the same pic with the same lens, the NON full frame pic would look cropped in comparison to this full frame.


Canon Rebel T5i
- $850 with lens kit
- 18 MP
- 5.0 fps shooting
- 1080 HD video
- * 3" movable LCD TOUCHSCREEN
- 9 autofocus points


Nikon D5300
- $895 with lens kit
- 24.2 MP
- 5.0 fps shooting
- 1080 HD video
- * 3.2" movable LCD NON-touchscreen
- *wifi capability
- switch between 9 / 21/ 39 autofocus points

If you have the cash and willing to spend, go full-frame...but not necessarily because of your reasoning. You could spend tens of thousands on a medium format and still have a shot that's no better than an iPhone pic. The advantage of full frame isn't really much of an advantage to someone new to photography. There is absolutely nothing wrong with sticking to a crop sensor. The field of view is less on a crop sensor, but you can compensate with an equivalent focal length lens. A 35mm on a DX is about the same as a 50mm on an FX for example. You can also do something as simple as taking a few steps back, lol.

It doesn't make a difference at this point which one you go with. Your pic's will be mediocre or crap until you know what you're doing, so it really doesn't matter. Everyone starts that way. I tell everyone just starting out to go with an entry level gear because it's a bit less overwhelming and less of an investment if they're not really into it. You can take great shots with the most basic of DSLR, the pricier gear only gets the shot easier. The caveat being knowing how everything works. Today's DSLR's can all take great shots and you'll likely require investing in better lenses and lighting to see huge "improvements."

So I guess my point it, go down to a camera shop and pick out the one that feels comfortable in your hands. Nikon, Canon, Sony, Leica, Hasselblad....whatever, they're all the same, just buy one and start shooting. Watch video, take a class and practice. You'll figure out on your own what works for you for the type of shots you take.

Personally, I prefer Nikon, so I'd go with the D610 if you want to FF or D7100 (or older model) if you want to spend a bit less. B&H, Adorama or Cameta Camera are sites I get my gear from. Don't dismiss refurbished or used gear either. Some sites offer them with the same if not longer warranty and you save a ton.

LunaZ 03-19-2014 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kazman (Post 2743697)
Here are some of the stats that I would look at to help you decide, since your first starting out.

Canon 60D
- $1,200 with lens kit
- 18 MP
- 5.3 fps shooting
- 1080 HD video
- * 3" movable LCD NON-touchscreen
- 9 autofocus points
- full frame ... Easiest way to describe this is... if you use a 100mm lens on this camera, you will be able to see more of an area then you would if you used a 100mm lens on a NON full frame camera. If this camera and a NON full frame took the same pic with the same lens, the NON full frame pic would look cropped in comparison to this full frame.


Are you sure about that?
A sensor labelled APS-C on a Canon typically means a 1.6 crop.

Cmike2780 03-19-2014 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LunaZ (Post 2744107)
Are you sure about that?
A sensor labelled APS-C on a Canon typically means a 1.6 crop.

Yup you're right. I though it said 6D at first

LunaZ 03-19-2014 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780 (Post 2744115)
Yup you're right. I though it said 6D at first

That 6D has some cool features for someone looking to get into an entry level full frame body :tup:

HKYStormFront 03-19-2014 08:50 PM

60D = crop body, 6D = full frame.

Agree with the noise on full fame vs crop as well.

TreeSemdyZee 03-19-2014 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HKYStormFront (Post 2744284)
60D = crop body, 6D = full frame.

Agree with the noise on full fame vs crop as well.


Oops. Thanks for clarifying. I was thinking of the 6D instead of the 60D

kazman 03-19-2014 11:50 PM

I was simply going off what someone else said as far as putting it down as a full frame.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780 (Post 2744018)
If you have the cash and willing to spend, go full-frame...but not necessarily because of your reasoning.

I wasnt trying to give a "reasoning" as to why to go full frame... I was just trying to explain to him what it was.

I personally use a 7D, I love the crop censors.

LunaZ 03-20-2014 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kazman (Post 2744522)
I was simply going off what someone else said as far as putting it down as a full frame.




I wasnt trying to give a "reasoning" as to why to go full frame... I was just trying to explain to him what it was.

I personally use a 7D, I love the crop censors.

My 7D had a few features that I miss since switching to a 5D MkII, but the benefits of the larger sensor and full frame work better for the kind of pictures I've been taking. :tup:

kazman 03-20-2014 09:54 AM

Heres a few I took of my BBS hex caps and spiked hardware that are on the Eclipse. 24k gold plated, done by Spin Fab.


http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3805/1...774f17ec_b.jpg
IMG_8673 by Scrape Artist, on Flickr


http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2852/1...6e7df86b_b.jpg
IMG_8684 combined by Scrape Artist, on Flickr


http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7439/1...013cbaf3_b.jpg
IMG_9501 by Scrape Artist, on Flickr

enkei2k 03-20-2014 01:19 PM

Thanks for the info guys.

I'm just getting one to play around with. I've decided on the T5i since, like mentioned, Rebel series are good for beginners and I can always just upgrade the lens in the future if needed.

:tiphat:

ZMan8 03-20-2014 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by enkei2k (Post 2745332)
Thanks for the info guys.

I'm just getting one to play around with. I've decided on the T5i since, like mentioned, Rebel series are good for beginners and I can always just upgrade the lens in the future if needed.

:tiphat:

:tup:

I have been happy with my t3i. They are good cameras to learn on and practice your skills. I recommend the 50mm 1.8 lens. for $100 it's amazing.

WARAT 03-25-2014 05:59 AM

Nothing wrong starting out with a rebel. If anything else. Invest in lens. A faster lens will get you really far and that bokeh oh so gravy! :)


Did a minishoot with a friend. Shot with 70-200. My 50 mm died. Such a good lens to have. :(

I know its not a Z but a picture nonetheless. Trying out different color tones on each pics.

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7133/1...cd6bd1e5_b.jpg
2E6C5365 by mikolitz, on Flickr

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7391/1...d34198a4_b.jpg
2E6C5331 by mikolitz, on Flickr

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7316/1...b0d03a5d_b.jpg
2E6C5326 by mikolitz, on Flickr

http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2860/1...a3fb59c6_b.jpg
2E6C5354 by mikolitz, on Flickr

HKYStormFront 03-25-2014 07:24 AM

#2 looks awesome, harsh reflections though break up the lines of the car. also, the color balance looks a little off but I can't tell if it's intentional or not...?

kazman 03-25-2014 12:43 PM

Nice Warat! my favorite is the first one. Both of those lenses are super sharp. I actually ended up trading in my 50mm to help pay for the 70-200.
Just a quess, but im guessing these were shot at f2.8. Try shooting at f4 with that lens! it takes away any chromatic abberations and reallly increases the sharpness / detail.

Very nice!

kazman 03-25-2014 12:54 PM

my BBS before i put eh gold hardware and spikes on.

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3708/1...83b4d0e3_b.jpg
IMG_8426 by Scrape Artist, on Flickr


http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7321/9...465caae4_b.jpg
IMG_6674 by Scrape Artist, on Flickr


http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3681/9...5a6ab622_b.jpg
IMG_6635 by Scrape Artist, on Flickr


At Oshkosh 2013

http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2891/9...e5489e66_b.jpg
IMG_6557 by Scrape Artist, on Flickr


http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3696/9...19cdd584_b.jpg
IMG_6551 by Scrape Artist, on Flickr


http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2854/9...bf4e42c0_b.jpg
IMG_6421 by Scrape Artist, on Flickr


in Chicago

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5344/9...e48d902e_b.jpg
IMG_6368 by Scrape Artist, on Flickr

onzedge 03-25-2014 02:08 PM

^^^ Nice work. :tup:

onzedge 03-25-2014 02:09 PM

http://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...39254980_n.jpg

saber 03-25-2014 03:21 PM

what lens was the chicago picture taken with kazman? might be my eyes playing tricks on me but it looks like it's pincushioning a little.

kazman 03-25-2014 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saber (Post 2753079)
what lens was the chicago picture taken with kazman? might be my eyes playing tricks on me but it looks like it's pincushioning a little.

The building one? 24-105L

kazman 03-25-2014 03:45 PM

By pin cushioning, do you mean something like pinching in the middle?

WARAT 03-26-2014 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HKYStormFront (Post 2752190)
#2 looks awesome, harsh reflections though break up the lines of the car. also, the color balance looks a little off but I can't tell if it's intentional or not...?

Unfortunately I couldn't do much with the reflections and I'm not really into editing that much. With that said, yes the color balance was intentional. Was just experimenting

Quote:

Originally Posted by kazman (Post 2752838)
Nice Warat! my favorite is the first one. Both of those lenses are super sharp. I actually ended up trading in my 50mm to help pay for the 70-200.
Just a quess, but im guessing these were shot at f2.8. Try shooting at f4 with that lens! it takes away any chromatic abberations and reallly increases the sharpness / detail.

Very nice!

Thanks. Most if not all are shot at 2.8. I'm aware at 4.0 will help with sharpness. I just wanted to add more bokeh. Lol. Hence another reason why i want a 135. :(

HKYStormFront 03-26-2014 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WARAT (Post 2753834)
Unfortunately I couldn't do much with the reflections and I'm not really into editing that much. With that said, yes the color balance was intentional. Was just experimenting

been there, done that, got the t-shirt: Keller's GTR Photoshoot - 4/24/10 - JPMcG Photography

Quote:

Originally Posted by WARAT (Post 2753834)
Thanks. Most if not all are shot at 2.8. I'm aware at 4.0 will help with sharpness. I just wanted to add more bokeh. Lol. Hence another reason why i want a 135. :(

are you using a crop body or a full frame? i've got the 135L and it's stunning: My '09 Pontiac G8 GXP - JPMcG Photography

onzedge 03-27-2014 08:26 AM

http://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...53763041_n.jpg

kazman 03-27-2014 08:57 AM

Ive seen that picture somewhere. i think the facebook page posted it the other day if im not mistaken ^

NickTurnon 03-27-2014 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kazman (Post 2755954)
Ive seen that picture somewhere. i think the facebook page posted it the other day if im not mistaken ^

OR he posted it?!? :eek:

LOL, he said it was him on the FB Page.

saber 03-27-2014 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kazman (Post 2753114)
By pin cushioning, do you mean something like pinching in the middle?

yes. my eyes are trippin' out on it lol. it's why i don't do a lot of architecture...i get really annoyed and take forever editing to get all the lines to look nice.

kazman 03-27-2014 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickTurnon (Post 2756211)
OR he posted it?!? :eek:

LOL, he said it was him on the FB Page.

heres my extent of facebook surfacing... i barely take the time to read the descriptions. lol

SCROLL
\/
\/
\/
CAR PIC, "thats cools"
*like*
\/
\/
\/

WARAT 03-27-2014 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HKYStormFront (Post 2753905)
been there, done that, got the t-shirt: Keller's GTR Photoshoot - 4/24/10 - JPMcG Photography



are you using a crop body or a full frame? i've got the 135L and it's stunning: My '09 Pontiac G8 GXP - JPMcG Photography

Aaaahhh! I really want one so bad! Lol.

I use a FF.

kazman 04-02-2014 05:56 PM

Well i decided to start up my photography brand again. its called STREET MANOR. added some links in my signature.

Heres one from a while back. my buddies bagged and satin white wrapped 4th gen eclipse.
wheels are Volk SF-Winnings

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7427/...70a82801_b.jpg

saber 04-03-2014 10:59 AM

might be my screen but that really could use a little bit more light in the front.

Pintsize725 04-05-2014 09:25 PM

I think I'm about to get a T3i body. I've been thinking of starting with a macro this time since I take a lot of nature shots. Anyone have a recommendation for a reasonably priced option?

HKYStormFront 04-05-2014 09:40 PM

Anything with a "macro" label ends up being pretty pricey from what I've seen. I don't know much about them tho so it'd be hard for me to give advice on them. I know a lot of people like the 180mm macro lens.

Cmike2780 04-06-2014 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pintsize725 (Post 2770483)
I think I'm about to get a T3i body. I've been thinking of starting with a macro this time since I take a lot of nature shots. Anyone have a recommendation for a reasonably priced option?

I suggest buying a set of extension tubes if you want to experiment before going big with pricey macro lens. A set usually run about $100 and let's you focus up close with the lenses you have. You'll need a sturdy tripod, good light source and a remote trigger.

kazman 04-07-2014 03:51 PM

s'more car ones,



https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2829/...cc12c8b6_b.jpg


https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7075/...b600bc56_b.jpg


https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3814/...c898baa3_b.jpg


https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7004/...1a4128d3_b.jpg

kazman 04-09-2014 02:40 PM

Rig shot of my Eclipse I did yesterday.

https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3689/...7af66afa_b.jpg

HKYStormFront 04-09-2014 05:54 PM

whenever I see a rig shot of a car with wheels like that, I wish there was an outtake like this:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/39390374@N05/5604507757https://www.flickr.com/photos/39390374@N05/5604507757
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ronaldo86/5605329442


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2