08-16-2011, 03:19 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 76,801
Drives: N/A
Rep Power: 141522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitex
Oh and now i really want a celestron!
|
 hahaha!!! i'll have to try a prime down the road...(next year maybe.  )
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTHAUS
Is VR an image stabilization or something? If so no, I do not. The Sigma 10-20 I was using does not have that feature.
|
yah. ahh, thanks for the info. hummm... that's a good shot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vividracing
1/40 according to EXIF. How fast were you going?
VR is the Nikon term, IS is the Canon term  Personally, I hate VR/IS for panning or rolling shots. I've played with all the different modes/combos of settings and I still get better shots without VR. I can pan an 80mph car handheld at 1/60 (160mm++) and get better results with VR off than with it on. |
huh, thanks for the tip! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKYStormFront
that is correct^^ it does make a difference, i found myself fighting the IS system on my 100-400 when trying to do panning shots. ended up just turning the whole system off  |
wonder why they even bothered to put the VR/IS feature on, huh? .... 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
14Likes
Threaded Mode
