![]() |
Now dont get me wrong guys .. I am by no means a big fan of the new Camaro.. But I know what the people on a LS1 site would
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 115
Drives: 05 Black GTO
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Now dont get me wrong guys .. I am by no means a big fan of the new Camaro.. But I know what the people on a LS1 site would say.. I just wondered what the rest of the world thinks ....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
Personally, owning a 1969 Camaro and a 2000 Camaro, I think it has all the right looks...but its too god damn big. Its got the right power plant, too. IRS be damned, I dont really care (the purists want a live axle). The lines are great for a muscle car look, and I think they did a much more faithful job of that than the new Mustang did. The Challenger practically mirrors its older version (pity its 4100 lbs). The down side, is its SO ******* HEAVY. The 1SS (lowest package that has the 6.2L LS3) weighs over 3900 lbs! I was planning on getting one as long as it weighed somewhat close to my 2000 (which is about 3400 lbs). Oh, how disappointed I was when it came out so heavy . Such a pity, it looks cool, but its going to be just as much of a dog as the GTO is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 115
Drives: 05 Black GTO
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|