![]() |
Originally Posted by Mike They are kind of hard to compare, as they serve totally different purposes, but I think I would give both a solid 9 for right now.
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 1,109
Drives: 19 Audi TT RS
Rep Power: 23 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
So far, just the addition of the performance clutch/flywheel and the reduction of the unsprung mass by the custom wheels and lightweight rotors has suprisingly ratcheted up the fun factor by a few, significant degrees. In a few weeks I will be laying the groundwork for more power, so hopefully that satiates my appetiate for performance for the time being. With a Porsche or Corvette I would get all of what I am doing to the Z "out-of-the-box". Here in Colorado I see as many GT-Rs as Zs on the road it seems, but Porsches and Corvettes are very common. So the Z has that rare factor here. I like them all! Thanks for the response! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Z-land
Posts: 1,009
Drives: 2012 370z sport 6-sp
Rep Power: 55342 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Hmmm tough question the 911 is the pinnacle of sports cars buth the new F type coupe is so sexy. As much as I love the 911 I would choose the F type coupe but with a 6speed manual cause it is one of the best looking cars out there at any price.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14859 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Spending this much money. It's really NOT an easy choice. The 911 iconic performance and heritage sells this car fast.
But the Jaguar, IMHO, seems to have fun factor at a much higher scale. Only because of the addictive v8 exhaust note and Jaguars first "raw" sports car in decades. Torque wins in most cases but, the 911 makes a compelling argument in track focused handling. But why not get the GT-S? That's the one on my list. Lava Orange please? Lol
__________________
Favorite Quote. "I'm not gonna kill you... I'm just gonna Bash Your Face In" Jack Nicholson-"The Shining". 1980 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 1,109
Drives: 19 Audi TT RS
Rep Power: 23 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,105
Drives: Spirited
Rep Power: 11717 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
911
__________________
2012 Z-SOLD 2014 Nismo #565 Fast Intentions CBE/HFC/Swift/SPC/RJM/H&R-15/20mm/Z1 CAI/Headers/Intake Manifold w/Uprev Tune 328.31whp/263.64tq |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: farr north
Posts: 241
Drives: 11 BMW 335i 6AT
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
![]()
Drove the F-type S roadster version, exterior and looks are really nice, interior is well laid out and hot.
It got a nice rumble upon start, has an extra button to make the exhaust louder and burble quite a bit. Nice power to get you quickly upto 100 km.h, and thats where the fun kinda ends. Beyond this it seems to have little hard time going up, as if parking brake is on, trust me its not. The exhaust gets really loud, and this is factory, but the speed is gradually going up but not fast enough. I tried different modes but still same. There is a dynamic mode, apparently I can tune things, will try that soon. Handling is not bad but not the greatest, I expected it take corners really easy but felt heavy a bit. I give it thumbs up for the looks, exhaust rumble and interior and it ends there. Oh, u get lot of thumbs up from ladies. If you're ok with all this then get F type otherwise 911. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14859 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
Favorite Quote. "I'm not gonna kill you... I'm just gonna Bash Your Face In" Jack Nicholson-"The Shining". 1980 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
Track Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: washington dc
Posts: 995
Drives: Nismo Z
Rep Power: 179 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Süd Germany
Posts: 2,462
Drives: 21Supra 2.0/22 M240i
Rep Power: 21268 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Evora is a good car. The manual gearbox cars need the motor dropped to do the clutch. Thats about 2500+ at the dealer. How often do you do that? Not very unless you are a bad manual driver. Overall those cars are sound.
Id go 911 compared to the Jag. I like the Jag but they suffer horrendous depreciation vs the 911. Quality wise Porsche is doing well. Looks wise the Jag is superb. Performance and braking etc. Go 911. They are both nice and will make any buyer pleased. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jaguar sound | Jimbo370 | Exhaust/Intake | 0 | 04-22-2014 10:15 PM |
2014 Jaguar F-Type - really? | ajc1884 | Other Vehicles | 55 | 07-22-2013 06:00 AM |
Jaguar C-X16 | toxik | Other Vehicles | 22 | 03-16-2012 10:38 PM |
Honda S2000 vs BMW 135i vs Nissan 370Z vs Porsche Cayman S vs Porsche 911 | JvKintheUSA | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 2 | 08-04-2009 01:48 PM |
Jaguar SFR Bonneville 225.675 MPH | AK370Z | Other Vehicles | 7 | 01-25-2009 02:21 AM |