Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   More info on the next 370Z (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/94916-more-info-next-370z.html)

Montez 08-15-2014 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by b15 (Post 2932353)
Seems like hybrid drive trains are the future of sports cars. Great concept for instant torque, but I'd like to see how they hold up to some hard driving first.

Also given the Z's following and the massive amount of money members spend to go FI, I don't see an issue with a $50k Z if the power/handling/looks are inline. It's a niche car so it'll get exponentially more expensive as the performance increases. If it were sold in masses like the Corvette, it'd be a different story. I would personally buy one if it's a great out of the box package vs going turbo on an NA engine + supporting mods. The end result would cost about the same too. I don't understand what this obsession with $30k is. Yes, the Z was originally introduced as a budget friendly sports car, but that same reasoning will prevent the Z from evolving.

Also keep in mind Nissan's financial troubles when the 300zx was discontinued. They were on the verge of bankruptcy. Yes it was pricey for it's time, but it was also ahead of it's time and gave many cars a run for their money. This is what I think Nissan needs to return the Z to. Not a cost cutting $30k sports car. If Honda brings the S2000 back and Toyota the FT-1, this Z35 will fit right in. I would love to see the return of competitive Japanese sports cars.

Well Nissan itself markets it as a budget competitor to Caymans and other sports cars and has been marketed this way for years. The world knows it as such and its formula has worked for the most part, if Nissan upped its starting price to 50K ish you think that it has low low sells now from the 29K price point. Virtually no one would buy it and it would die off pretty quickly at that price point.

Firebase99 08-15-2014 05:31 PM

Oh, further, I do miss the intimacy of the Z, the small 2 seat feeling of that closed cockpit. I've owned A LOT Z's the 370 was my 2nd favorite behind the 300. The 240 was fun but slow in reality. 350 was great, had the Touring 6 speed, nav, but it handled like my now 3.8 without the power. Plus, the interior, really? In 2007 when I got it it was just then tolerable for $34k. I drove a few 370's with auto, nav, top of line, it was CLOSE to the 3.8 I bought but still didn't give me everything I really wanted and it was like 8 grand more. THe ONLY THING I miss on my 3.8 vs my Z is the HID lights. Yes, for $1000 more I could have gotten the "Ultimate" 3.8 that has the HIDS, but the ONLY trim you can get that in black leather. Blah!! The interior in the 3.8 GT POPS with the tan.

Edit: the Z is WAY sexier than the 3.8 by a huge margin. I almost didn't buy the Genesis, it's kinda ugly. But the interior is far superior. I almost didn't buy it but considering I drive the car and don't sit there looking at it...lol

b15 08-15-2014 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Montez (Post 2932464)
Well Nissan itself markets it as a budget competitor to Caymans and other sports cars and has been marketed this way for years. The world knows it as such and its formula has worked for the most part, if Nissan upped its starting price to 50K ish you think that it has low low sells now from the 29K price point. Virtually no one would buy it and it would die off pretty quickly at that price point.

Not $50k starting. $50k nicely optioned maybe $38-40k starting which still makes it a budget. Even today you won't find a $29k Z, and most want the sport package anyhow.

watson853 08-15-2014 10:02 PM

The article posted earlier said a starting price of 50-60k in the last sentence.

b15 08-15-2014 11:23 PM

I know. That was just my speculation. $50k starting with the right mix of power/handling/styling is fine with me!

Dirk McGurck 08-16-2014 12:09 AM

Upon further thought, I might be interested in a hybrid sports car if they put in a manual. Honda is the only manufacturer to offer a manual hybrid, actually three: CR-Z, Insight, and Civic Hybrid. If it's CVT across the board, 'm out.

zeeder 08-16-2014 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirk McGurck
If it's CVT across the board, 'm out.

Is there such a thing as a sports car with a CVT?

Dirk McGurck 08-16-2014 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zeeder (Post 2932801)
Is there such a thing as a sports car with a CVT?

Tesla Roadster. And it's not a sports car, but the new WRX is a CVT.

watson853 08-16-2014 07:08 AM

Yea CVT's have there place and it's not in my sports car..

Limeybastard 08-16-2014 08:09 AM

It is unfortunate that we including myself seem to compare numbers, meaning the higher the HP and TQ numbers the better the car must be. I must confess I have been sucked into this also.

In all honesty why do you think that there are so many stangs and camaros on the road these days? Think about it for a moment. It is simple, price v performance.

When Ford launched the Mustang, wasnt there moto or whatever something to do with power and affordability for the ordinary folks?

Personally for me if money was no objective Id be in a GTR or something a little subtle like an M4. But for bang for buck the GT is a no brainer. But so damn common!:roflpuke2:

watson853 08-16-2014 08:25 AM

Yea I live in Texas and tripped over 3 mustangs walking out my front door this morning. That being said I'd be lying if I said I haven't considered it do to it's pretty awesome 5.0 engine.

Davey 08-16-2014 08:45 AM

I don't really care if a car is "common" or not. The Mustang is kind of a big fat boat, although it is fast. I felt the current-gen had way to much lift and dive and anyone who has ever driven a car with a live axle will immediately recognize that the car had a live axle. That whole remote-mounted shifter thing is also BS. So yeah, very fast car, great engine, I felt the rest of the package was lacking.

One of the reasons I like the current-gen Z is that it starts at $30K. That's reasonable, for a toy car that sits in the garage half the time. $50K+, not so much.

watson853 08-16-2014 08:58 AM

More info on the next 370Z
 
The more the market is flooded with a certain vehicle I would have to think it affects there value. That's my only issue with common cars.

Davey 08-16-2014 09:24 AM

Yeah, that's a good point. If it's easy to find 10 cars with the same options, your resale is a lot more negotiable (in a bad way).

watson853 08-16-2014 09:43 AM

Yea were pretty lucky Ford pumps out like 30,000 mustangs a month and I think nissan sells around like 9000 Z's a year in the states.

Limeybastard 08-16-2014 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey (Post 2933000)
I don't really care if a car is "common" or not. The Mustang is kind of a big fat boat, although it is fast. I felt the current-gen had way to much lift and dive and anyone who has ever driven a car with a live axle will immediately recognize that the car had a live axle. That whole remote-mounted shifter thing is also BS. So yeah, very fast car, great engine, I felt the rest of the package was lacking.

One of the reasons I like the current-gen Z is that it starts at $30K. That's reasonable, for a toy car that sits in the garage half the time. $50K+, not so much.

Yeah good point raised there about the handling. I remember driving a car with a live rear axle once, it was freaking crap. hit a small pot hole the whole rear would jerk to one side.

edk370 08-16-2014 04:48 PM

Like the Z32, Nissan should do 3 versions: NA V6 with 300ish hp; 6-cyl turbo with 400+ hp a la BMW M4/M3; and last but definitely not least....HYBRID with close to 400 if not more hp.

I know some of you dislike hybrids. But the world is changing and so are gas prices ;) Ride in a Tesla P85 and you will see how instantaneous electric torque is. It's GT-R or Vette C7 torque from a standstill.

MagmaRed370z 08-16-2014 08:07 PM

I would never pay 60k for a Z. Too much money. Used GTR is at about 65k.

Virtual 08-17-2014 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by schellingr (Post 2933511)
Used GTR is at about 65k.

you can soon buy a charger hellcat new for 63k

watson853 08-17-2014 07:14 AM

Exactly if it's actually worth 60K meaning it's competitive with other cars in its price range like a new C7 people will buy it.

zeeder 08-17-2014 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watson853 (Post 2933758)
Exactly if it's actually worth 60K meaning it's competitive with other cars in its price range like a new C7 people will buy it.

Exactly, if it's got the quality and specifications to compete at the $60k level then it could certainly be successful. It's not like they're going to put that price tag on something with the current Z's performance.

That being said, I hope they don't take it that high as then I'll definitely be priced out of the market!

edk370 08-17-2014 04:01 PM

^remember guys, when the Z32 TT debuted it was a direct competitor to C4 Vette. The people saw it that way too. They had about the same level of hp, 0-60; 1/4 times, MSRP, etc. But Nissan had to put the Z on hiatus because the SUV craze came into play during the mid 90s and on because the trend was changing. The Z33 imo was a let down. Watered down, styling was kinda cheap and plasticky, and the C5, C6 Vettes were a step above it in price, performance, etc.

If the next Z can make at least 400hp, do 12-sec range 1/4s, etc....people will pay $60K for it. It will be a direct competitor to C7 Vette...then, the Z06/ZR1 will be the direct competitor to the GT-R....But I gotta feeling Nissan is gonna cheapen down the Z to make it a mass market sports car like the BRC Scion...whatever that Beans Rice and Cheesy thing is supposed to be.

Codename067 08-17-2014 04:15 PM

No way it would be cheaper than the current Z. But if the 60k stays, I'd rather pick up a used GTR or a used mdded E92 M3 instead.

watson853 08-17-2014 06:27 PM

More info on the next 370Z
 
Off topic again looks like the Z06/ZR1 may be mid engine along with the next gen corvette the C8. Ok chevy you got my attention now go through with it..

http://carbuzz.com/news/2014/8/17/Th...gined-7722052/

Dirk McGurck 08-17-2014 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watson853 (Post 2934195)
Off topic again looks like the Z06/ZR1 may be mid engine along with the next gen corvette the C8. Ok chevy you got my attention now go through with it..

The Next Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 Will be Mid-Engined

Looks like an NSX. At least, what the NSX should be...if it wasn't catching fire....

watson853 08-17-2014 09:19 PM

Those are all very old concepts as Chevy has dangled this in front of us for decades but the author makes some very good points as to why all signs point to them fallowing through this time. I'll always prefer Japanese design over American but there is something about a mid engined V8 that I may actually be able to afford that gives me goosebumps. It's gonna be an amazing next couple of years to be a car enthusiast.

maro 08-17-2014 11:08 PM

Found this
Successor The Nissan 370Z Will Develop 408 hp

Tick64 08-18-2014 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maro (Post 2934357)

Nice find. The stats sound nice.

"Nissan Z35 should go on sale during 2016, and very likely will be previewed the following year in concept form at the Auto Show in Tokyo."

I'm liking the 2016 sale date. Do you think they mean that the concept form might be shown at the Auto Show in Tokyo in 2015? What month is that show usually in?

maro 08-18-2014 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tick64 (Post 2934375)
Nice find. The stats sound nice.

"Nissan Z35 should go on sale during 2016, and very likely will be previewed the following year in concept form at the Auto Show in Tokyo."
I'm liking the 2016 sale date. Do you think they mean that the concept form might be shown at the Auto Show in Tokyo in 2015? What month is that show usually in?

End of october
If they show concept model than more likely to go on sale in summer of 2016

Possible idea
2014 tokyo autoshow = z35 concept
2015 = actuall model
2016 jan = sale

Virtual 08-18-2014 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maro (Post 2934379)
End of october

Possible idea
2014 tokyo autoshow = z35 concept
2015 = actuall model
2016 jan = sale

I don't expect nissan to say anything about the z35 until early next summer. Any sooner and that will hinder the sales of the new nismo

watson853 08-18-2014 09:23 AM

2016 would be pretty perfect so that the 50th anniversary edition won't be plagued by first model year issues like the 40th!

kenchan 08-18-2014 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watson853 (Post 2934534)
2016 would be pretty perfect so that the 50th anniversary edition won't be plagued by first model year issues like the 40th!

plagued? kinda strong and offensive choice of words for someone driving an AT car... :icon08:









:rofl2:

watson853 08-18-2014 10:05 AM

More info on the next 370Z
 
Sry ur so sensitive Kenchan. Also I chose the auto for specific reasons mainly because my knees are a mess from my time in the army.

kenchan 08-18-2014 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watson853 (Post 2934580)
Sry ur so sensitive Kenchan.

:icon18: you no fun.

Limeybastard 08-18-2014 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watson853 (Post 2934580)
Sry ur so sensitive Kenchan. Also I chose the auto for specific reasons mainly because my knees are a mess from my time in the army.

Becareful, he is a very sensitive kinda of fella deep inside. Dont want to end up like me on his ignore list. My days here have been a shadow of what they used to be from that time onwards that I was ignored by him.

b15 08-18-2014 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 2934552)
plagued? kinda strong and offensive choice of words for someone driving an AT car... :icon08:









:rofl2:

:drama:

kenchan 08-18-2014 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by b15 (Post 2934632)
:drama:

yah, watson didnt take the bait. :icon17:

UNKNOWN_370 08-19-2014 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by edk370 (Post 2934109)
^remember guys, when the Z32 TT debuted it was a direct competitor to C4 Vette. The people saw it that way too. They had about the same level of hp, 0-60; 1/4 times, MSRP, etc. But Nissan had to put the Z on hiatus because the SUV craze came into play during the mid 90s and on because the trend was changing. The Z33 imo was a let down. Watered down, styling was kinda cheap and plasticky, and the C5, C6 Vettes were a step above it in price, performance, etc.

If the next Z can make at least 400hp, do 12-sec range 1/4s, etc....people will pay $60K for it. It will be a direct competitor to C7 Vette...then, the Z06/ZR1 will be the direct competitor to the GT-R....But I gotta feeling Nissan is gonna cheapen down the Z to make it a mass market sports car like the BRC Scion...whatever that Beans Rice and Cheesy thing is supposed to be.

No one will pay for A $60k Z. Going upmarket due to the state of the yen is what killed the Z32. Not so much SUV'S People expect a Z to be less than a vette with near performance. At $38k the Z32 was selling. At $50k it did nothing. Same will happen if we go upmarket

b15 08-19-2014 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370 (Post 2935401)
No one will pay for A $60k Z. Going upmarket due to the state of the yen is what killed the Z32. Not so much SUV'S People expect a Z to be less than a vette with near performance. At $38k the Z32 was selling. At $50k it did nothing. Same will happen if we go upmarket

Again, if it has the right specs to back up going upmarket, people will buy it, including myself. There's a huge difference between pricing it up because of the yen (as with the later years of the z32) and pricing it there because thats the price it can command based on what it offers. Why are people so fixated on a cheap price yet complain about not having enough performance/options. If the current z34 went for $60k you're right no one would buy it. But this, hopefully, will be a different formula than the Z34

The z32 was also long in tooth when it was discontinued, coupled with Nissans financial troubles, increasing emissions standards and the rising yen. When a company is near bankruptcy, they have to cut fast. The Z had always been a niche car and will never sell in the masses like the vette which unfortunately adversely affects the pricing. I don't get it, people will rave about a vette, who until recently was a cheaply built car for $60k that only offered raw power. Yet the idea of a Nissan Z that could rival it in the $50k range is so absurd? Seems like majority here want vette power, Porsche refinement at a BRZ price.

NeoRacer 08-19-2014 12:04 PM

Going upmarket will put it out of the hands of middle class owners, 60-70k is more than some people make in a year. Even 35k is a stretch but doable with creative financing.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2