0-60 mph under 6 seconds for under $60,000

ElVee · 09-10-2013, 12:22 PM

I use 0-60 times when comparing cars, though it's clearly not the end-all be-all statistic. I do have some personal criteria though.

- try to stick with the same source for times. Mags will run a car over and over in various ways until they get THE fastest time they can eke out of a run. That's the number they use. It might not be a practical number for most of us that don't drag. Every source runs differently and with different numbers. But as long as you're measuring with the same test, you can do some valid comparisons. (test road, test driver(s), conditions, altitude, stockness...)

- mag times aren't going to be times that I experience on the road. But it still does demonstrate straight line speed in a test. *shrug*

- It's not a "stupid" statistic.

It's not the only statistic, but it's not a stupid one.

- I don't "race" my car, so it's not like I have firsthand times on hand, just like a large majority of drivers. I'll let someone else "race" the car and come back with times. Just because that happens, doesn't make the statistic "stupid."

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Hybrid supercar does 60 MPH in 2.5 seconds	Nismo89	Other Vehicles	0	11-12-2012 05:17 PM
2013 GT-R.....0-60 in 2.72 Seconds	370Zsteve	Other Vehicles	11	11-29-2011 12:48 AM
First 8 Seconds R35 Nissan GTR 1500 hp	ducky	Other Vehicles	3	08-23-2011 07:35 AM
Prototype GT350, 0-60 in 3.7 seconds	Red370	Other Vehicles	22	09-27-2010 09:54 PM
350Z 0 to 60 in 1.2 seconds	ConchZ2	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	13	08-29-2009 07:28 PM

09-10-2013, 12:22 PM	#20 (permalink)
ElVee Track Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Iowa Posts: 750 Drives: 13 370z 7at t+s grey Rep Power: 17	I use 0-60 times when comparing cars, though it's clearly not the end-all be-all statistic. I do have some personal criteria though. - try to stick with the same source for times. Mags will run a car over and over in various ways until they get THE fastest time they can eke out of a run. That's the number they use. It might not be a practical number for most of us that don't drag. Every source runs differently and with different numbers. But as long as you're measuring with the same test, you can do some valid comparisons. (test road, test driver(s), conditions, altitude, stockness...) - mag times aren't going to be times that I experience on the road. But it still does demonstrate straight line speed in a test. shrug - It's not a "stupid" statistic. It's not the only statistic, but it's not a stupid one. - I don't "race" my car, so it's not like I have firsthand times on hand, just like a large majority of drivers. I'll let someone else "race" the car and come back with times. Just because that happens, doesn't make the statistic "stupid."