![]() |
I think some of your guys expectations for the Nismo models are a bit too high. I honestly think it's quite a nice package from the factory. Looks are subjective,
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: so cal
Posts: 449
Drives: _
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() |
I think some of your guys expectations for the Nismo models are a bit too high. I honestly think it's quite a nice package from the factory.
Looks are subjective, but along with the bodykit, you get wheels, intake, exhaust and a tune. There are other parts included, but if one were to try and build a base model Z in the same manner as the nismo, costs would far exceed the Nismo's MSRP. All in all it represents a good value IMO. Could you build a faster Z or a better handling Z, sure, but everything done right from the factory with a warranty to boot is very nice to have. Even if you like to mod, I think the nismo would make a nice starting platform. The Nismo may be marketed as a more "track-ready" Z, and with the improved suspension I think it is, but more "track-ready" or not, Nissan still makes a compromises for a daily driven car and the overall market. There are many comparisons to M-models and AMG, but there is roughly a 15-20K price difference between say a moderately equipped M3 and a fully loaded 335i coupe. Could Nissan build a Z with more exclusivity and power, I'm sure they can, but really who is going to spend 50K plus on a Z. Bang for the buck is one of the main draw-points for the Z, so if you take that away, there are other options I'd consider. Some people have made comparisons to a GT3 and even a GT3RS, but again look at the price differential and eek, lack of power gain with the 3 and 3RS. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
If Nissan could extrapolate this achievement into a higher HP variant based on a detuned GT-R motor, upgrade the suspension package, wrap some leather into the cockpit components, substitute some brushed aluminum for plastic on the interior...you'd shift the bar up yet again. This $60k, twin-turbo, 420hp "real Nismo" 370Z would then be compared to $90k 911s instead of $60k Caymans. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 304
Drives: 07 V8 4Runner 4x4
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: so cal
Posts: 449
Drives: _
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
To turn around the argument, you could spend 15K on a base Z and get a built TT with 400-500whp. But yes a Nissan car aimed at the 911 would be interesting. The GT-R targets the 911 turbo and the 370Z targets the cayman....so another model could slide right in. Not sure it would sell though. A TT sounds nice, but for a something aimed at the regular 911, I'd like a V8 370Z or perhaps and non-turbo GT-R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
(drool)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Midwood
Posts: 232
Drives: 05 DBZ M6
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
![]() As for the i/e/ and tune Ill concede that Nissan is going to promote its in house Nismo products understandably so i dont expect them to use the best aftermarket [in terms of cold hard numbers] i/e and tune we know are available. But they could have at least matched the performance numbers some members are "easily" getting. The i/e/h tune numbers from guys like Semtex, RCZ put the Nismo Z's tweaks to shame and I know they didnt spend anywhere close to 10-15k premium for that. Check the latest tests fo the Nismo Z vs the regular Z and it aint faster. Why bother paying for a dud. Harsh but until a test validates the 10-15k premium over the other Z models thats what the Nismo Z essentially is. One can spend that 10-15k premium money and make a much better track Z and still keep their warranty imho. Im not looking for unreasonable products. Im sure Nissan has comparable performing products they could have used 1. KW Variant 2-3 suspension for example 2. Dual exhaust/header/intake and tune of your choice 3. Oil cooler of your choice Add em up and not close to 10k and you will run rings around the Nismo Z thats tested not faster than the normal Z. I still have money left for front brake upgrade or light weight seats. Imagine if I dealt with volume sales for those components like Nissan, Id save even more per item over a model line imho. Just thinking out loud.
__________________
Last edited by SnakeBitten; 07-19-2009 at 06:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: so cal
Posts: 449
Drives: _
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I think the nismo represents a good value, but no doubt you can get more gains through aftermarket parts. I've said in my previous post in this thread that you can get more performance through aftermarket parts. I don't think that was ever a question. And when the "15-20K" was brought up, that is in regards to M and AMG models compared to the regular variants. The Nismo does 15K more than a base model. A Z with touring/sports and nav will cost more than a nismo. I've seen the edmunds test, but that is just one test. I've commented on those threads. After all is said and done, I'd expect the Nismo to be a little faster or maybe the engine parts just don't make much more power. Or the parts make all their power at or near redline which could prove favorable on the track. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Midwood
Posts: 232
Drives: 05 DBZ M6
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
Also a Z with sport package and touring can be had for 36-38k when I was initially looking. Obviously out the door would be a bit more. But the Nismo Z starts at 39k. Out the door it will be 40k+ easily especially with the markups. Id get the SP, minus the nav package, so I can get the rev match and lsd. I can get such a car for around 34k when I was initially looking. 34k plus these mods below would make for a car around the Nismo Z's price with much better performance imho. Correct me if my numbers are not current. Stillen Exhaust - $1500 Stillen Intake - $549 Stillen Oil Cooler - $426 Berk High Flow Cats - $549 KW Variant 3 - $2000 Hotchkis Sway bar upgrade $375 Dyno Tune - $500-1000 maybe more. Total = 6399 without shipping. Price will climb with that added of course but I dont have a ball park for it as it varies. The above is just enough products to beatdown the Nismo Z with ease. I didnt include wheels or bodykit as they didnt help the Nismo Z at all against a sport packaged 370z and the body kit is useless at the track dispite Nissans claim of downforce. Downforce too minimal to affect the overall numbers vs the normal SP Z. Still have a bit of money left in that 10k Nismo premium for light track wheels, front big brake kit if the person choses. This wont get you a limited Nismo version but it will get you a Z that will embarrass the Nismo branded version on any track imho..BTW all the mods I listed wont void your waranty I believe as this is not a GTR lol. These threads are fun but purely wishfull thinking
__________________
Last edited by SnakeBitten; 07-19-2009 at 07:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 634
Drives: 07 NISMO 350Z SA M6
Rep Power: 492 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Remember, you can do all this, but you won't have the downforce of the factory body kit that helps plant the tires to the ground when needed. That is one of the most important parts on a road course, is that downforce.
Quote:
__________________
SOLD: 2007 NISMO 350Z #0044 Silver Alloy New DD: 2010 Titan Pro4X CC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Midwood
Posts: 232
Drives: 05 DBZ M6
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
A Z equipped like I posted before would kill the Nismo Z with ease on track. Yes its about parts working in harmony but the Nismo Z package is hardly untouchable for less money than the premium it commands. All Nissan did was add standard stuff enthusiasts add but with less performance as evidenced by some of the numbers guys are getting with similar mods imho. BTW thanks for the correction on the body welds. I assumed the 370z Nismo had the body welds as well.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 634
Drives: 07 NISMO 350Z SA M6
Rep Power: 492 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
150lb at 70~ mph is A LOT! I can feel it on my Z when I am on the road course. It gets more traction and wants to grip the faster I go which is like the opposite of what it would normally do.
![]() Sadly you are one that has never been on a track with a NISMO Z. There are many videos out there that already show how well the NISMO does with race slicks. No aftermarket Z has yet to handle as smooth and good. But then again, the 370z has no body welds which is a huge difference in handling, so that might be enough for someone to blow off the NISMO this year. Quote:
__________________
SOLD: 2007 NISMO 350Z #0044 Silver Alloy New DD: 2010 Titan Pro4X CC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: west palm beach
Posts: 372
Drives: nismo 370z black.
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
+1
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Airport Nissan Photoshoot (Z33 NISMO, Z34 NISMO, R35 GTR) | HKYStormFront | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 58 | 01-30-2010 11:10 AM |
| Nismo and Nismo S-tune confusion | phantom21 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 16 | 09-20-2009 09:38 AM |
| NISMO 370Z at Gunn Nissan vs 350Z NISMO pics side-by-side | NIZMOZ | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 34 | 07-07-2009 09:10 AM |