![]() |
Originally Posted by Red__Zed "Extension of" being the key phrase--what exactly is shared between the two again? J series? You mean the screamer from the MDX that is several years
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7336 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
J series are in every single Honda vehicle that has a V6. And since when did chassis have anything to do with an argument over engine design? Honda went with the SOHC design because it's more compact and easier to fit trans-mounted. Again though, not part of the argument. As a reminder, it was why Nissan is sticking with the VQ and not redesigning it. BTW, the VQ is only a few years older than the J series. The entire engine block share the same design concepts with other VQ's. I'll let pictures do the talking, everyone likes pictures. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Looks like family to me... CVT wasn't brought up as a potential use for performance vehicles, sometimes I agree with you, but this is one of the many things we don't meet eye to eye with.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction ![]() Last edited by SS_Firehawk; 12-16-2012 at 05:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
good lord. I hope you are trolling. Quote:
trollol |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 174
Drives: 2011 Tour/Spt 7AT
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Quote:
Last edited by CSA0890; 12-17-2012 at 07:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|