Berk HFC's over Stillen HFC's

UNKNOWN_370 · 01-09-2012, 08:08 AM

I ran G3's on my G37, you don't feel any benefit unless you are flooring the car and you pass 4600 rpm. Right now I have the mishimoto intake hoses and K&N filters. It cost me a total of $198 vs. $575. I'm happier with the hose setup. You get a slight increase in peddle response which is definately welcomed. A subtle boost in power in low rpm's. You actually lose power with the G3 down low. And a modest gain in the middle to high revs. The G3 will give you a stronger boost up high but... add an exhaust and tune with the hose and filters. I think the overall power delivery will yield more realistic use of power vs low rev power loss and higher rev power boost.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Berk HFC's + Stillen CBE = RAAAAAAASSSSPPPPP	atx370z	Intake/Exhaust	31	01-18-2014 01:23 AM
WTB Berk, or Stillen HFC's	Mr&Mrs	Wanted	0	08-24-2010 07:02 AM
Those with G3's/Stillen CBE/Berk HFC's	Red370	Intake/Exhaust	23	02-14-2010 03:07 PM
WTB: Berk/Stillen/FI HFC's	Red370	Parts for sale (Private Classifieds)	3	10-02-2009 05:36 PM
HFC's. Stillen or Berk???	Stockgtr	Intake/Exhaust	21	06-27-2009 03:03 PM

01-09-2012, 08:08 AM	#26 (permalink)
UNKNOWN_370 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: ny'r livn in tx Posts: 8,687 Drives: well over 130m.p.h. Rep Power: 14859	I ran G3's on my G37, you don't feel any benefit unless you are flooring the car and you pass 4600 rpm. Right now I have the mishimoto intake hoses and K&N filters. It cost me a total of $198 vs. $575. I'm happier with the hose setup. You get a slight increase in peddle response which is definately welcomed. A subtle boost in power in low rpm's. You actually lose power with the G3 down low. And a modest gain in the middle to high revs. The G3 will give you a stronger boost up high but... add an exhaust and tune with the hose and filters. I think the overall power delivery will yield more realistic use of power vs low rev power loss and higher rev power boost.