|
these times (if true) are due more to a stronger engine then most. While Nissan auto's are good they are not dual clutch units like the PDK or used on
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-25-2009, 07:12 AM
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida & SC
Posts: 86
Drives: 05 Tundra& 02 Subaru
Rep Power: 18  |
I would think that
these times (if true) are due more to a stronger engine then most. While Nissan auto's are good they are not dual clutch units like the PDK or used on the Ferrari and Lambo. I would still think the manual, car for car, would be a tad quicker with a professional driver. With an average driver, then I would give the nod to the auto in most situations that call for straight line acceleration. Again, I would have to see more tests with different cars to believe this test. I, am however, a sceptic under most conditions.
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MotorTrend First Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z test drive 4.7 sec 0 to 60 11.25.08 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 47 | 11-11-2009 08:06 PM |
| MotorWeek Road Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z | dlmartin81 | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 10 | 03-16-2009 12:59 AM |
| 2009 Nissan 370Z - "NEW" Road Test By Car and Drive 02.04.09 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 6 | 02-05-2009 08:06 PM |
| ROAD & TRACK Video - Full Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z | sbsmoov | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 4 | 12-01-2008 11:05 PM |
| Great C&D article... 2009 Nissan 370Z - Road Test | ctzn | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 21 | 12-01-2008 04:34 PM |
Threaded Mode
