04-17-2009, 11:53 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Base Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Port Washington, WI
Age: 48
Posts: 183
Drives: 2004 RX-8
Rep Power: 17
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MightyBobo
I remember hearing that somehow the "true" displacement of a rotary was in actuality double what they say it is, but I cant remember why...I'll have to look into it...
|
You are correct. It is actually 1.3L per rotor, so technically it is a 2.6. So you essentially have a 2.6L rotary engine that has the low end power of a 4-cylinder and the gas mileage of a V-8. Not real impressive when you look at it that way.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
