Stillen Supercharged Article - R & T

Red370 · 10-29-2010, 09:19 PM

shitty drivers fellas, didnt yall read the part where they said their stock time was a 5.3? and their stock 1/4 was 13.7 @103? they dropped 8/10s on their 0-60 and almost a full second in the 1/4, whats that mean? that guys running low 13's can run low 12's, put on some D/R's and the car will do 11's. Thats nothing to scoff at gentlemen.

Endgame · 10-30-2010, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red370

shitty drivers fellas, didnt yall read the part where they said their stock time was a 5.3? and their stock 1/4 was 13.7 @103? they dropped 8/10s on their 0-60 and almost a full second in the 1/4, whats that mean? that guys running low 13's can run low 12's, put on some D/R's and the car will do 11's. Thats nothing to scoff at gentlemen.

I must agree with this.... As Import Convert stated, we have bolt on guys running these numbers (almost). I bet this is a case of bad driving.....

ImportConvert · 10-30-2010, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Endgame

I must agree with this.... As Import Convert stated, we have bolt on guys running these numbers (almost). I bet this is a case of bad driving.....

Have you ever seen a C6 Z06 magazine time in the high-12's? That is the kind of hp/weight ratio we are talking here, nearly. Find me a C6 Z06 time/trap magazine-time within half a second and 5mph of that and I will buy it, until then--inflated numbers.

Better yet, find me a similar magazine-time AND trap for a GT500. It has tires just as narrow, or narrower, and similar power, with LOTS more weight.

I'm just not buying it. Not at all.

Endgame · 10-31-2010, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert

Have you ever seen a C6 Z06 magazine time in the high-12's? That is the kind of hp/weight ratio we are talking here, nearly. Find me a C6 Z06 time/trap magazine-time within half a second and 5mph of that and I will buy it, until then--inflated numbers.

Better yet, find me a similar magazine-time AND trap for a GT500. It has tires just as narrow, or narrower, and similar power, with LOTS more weight.

I'm just not buying it. Not at all.

agree....... well, sort of. I still think bad driving coupled with lack of HP... Whoever said this car was putting out 375, I have to agree.

ImportConvert · 10-31-2010, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Endgame

agree....... well, sort of. I still think bad driving coupled with lack of HP... Whoever said this car was putting out 375, I have to agree.

The ET is bad driving/tires/suspension (for drag). The Trap is the 375 I predict.

christian370z · 10-31-2010, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert

I call it like I see it. A 500bhp 3300# car should trap higher than 113mph. The fact that it even made it into the 12's tells me it had enough traction for better than a 113 trap if it's truly making 500bhp. The car is not making 500bhp. If you think it is, provide evidence. However, the magazine knocked around 1 second off and added 10mph trap speed--same driver/conditions. That is 100whp. That is 432bhp. May be off by 20, 30, 40bhp, but even so---it's not 500bhp.

You are probably correct, your numbers are all certainly in line with the performance the Stillen Z had shown. Judging from what I have seen regarding the Stillen supercharger kit, I highly doubt it is putting out anything more than what you indicated.

In fact, if the car is putting down the amount others on this forum are putting down with the supercharger kit, that is better than if they brought out their original press car which would have led to unrealistic performance.

HOODEY · 08-23-2013, 02:35 PM

500Hp ain't 500hp. It is all about the area under the curve or torque.
The peak power may indeed be correct based on the power obtain from a pressure ratio of 1.5.

ImportConvert · 10-30-2010, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red370

shitty drivers fellas, didnt yall read the part where they said their stock time was a 5.3? and their stock 1/4 was 13.7 @103? they dropped 8/10s on their 0-60 and almost a full second in the 1/4, whats that mean? that guys running low 13's can run low 12's, put on some D/R's and the car will do 11's. Thats nothing to scoff at gentlemen.

So...they gained 100whp.
FAIL.
1 second quicker, 10mph faster = 100whp.

Stock Z's dyno around 270. This one seems to be around 370.

432bhp...or roughly 70bhp less than advertised. Mazda did something similar once (RX8) and had to offer to buy back every one of the cars at the price the customer paid, if the customer chose to take the option.

10-29-2010, 09:19 PM	#1 (permalink)
Red370 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Kaiserslautern, Germany Posts: 4,391 Drives: your mom to church Rep Power: 297	shitty drivers fellas, didnt yall read the part where they said their stock time was a 5.3? and their stock 1/4 was 13.7 @103? they dropped 8/10s on their 0-60 and almost a full second in the 1/4, whats that mean? that guys running low 13's can run low 12's, put on some D/R's and the car will do 11's. Thats nothing to scoff at gentlemen. __________________ 2011 Mustang 5.0 \| 3.55's \| Lethal Performance off road H-Pipe \| Magnaflow Muffler Delete \| JLT CAI/Bama tuned 417whp/ 404 ft/lbs

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Stillen Supercharged!	thezmonster	Engine & Drivetrain	22	10-19-2010 11:29 AM
article about Stillen tuned cars with pictures	Lemers	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	17	05-20-2010 04:28 PM
370z vs Supercharged E46 M3	GingaBreadMan	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	32	04-10-2010 10:49 PM
Supercharged 370 vs GTR?	FuPaXxTyTy	Engine & Drivetrain	32	02-11-2010 09:31 AM

08-23-2013, 02:35 PM	#7 (permalink)
HOODEY Base Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Barbados Posts: 43 Drives: Uk spec 08 350z gt Rep Power: 13	500Hp ain't 500hp. It is all about the area under the curve or torque. The peak power may indeed be correct based on the power obtain from a pressure ratio of 1.5.