![]() |
Originally Posted by shirokenkami Eh, not really. The Z(Non-Nismo) is rated at 10.1 lbs per HP versus the Challenger SRT8 which 8.9 lbs per HP. The Z will absolutely smoke
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#25 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Gatineau, QC, CA
Posts: 47
Drives: 2017 370z TS 6 speed
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
______ An excellent case in point is the relationship between a vehicle's curb weight and its power and torque outputs. The oft-referenced power-to-weight ratio has always made more sense to me when expressed as weight-to-power, where I can see exactly how many pounds each horsepower (or pound-foot of torque) is being asked to lug. Directly from: Top performance car power-to-weight ratios under $100k, $50k and $25k - Autoblog _______ As you can see in the lists on that site: the lower the number usually means the faster accelerating car, thus in this case, it appears the challenger outpulls the 370z just based on the stats you posted unless I don't understand correctly. Don't get me wrong, though, I'd take the 370z over the challenger any day... ![]() ![]()
__________________
2017 370z Touring Sport, 6MT, daily driver (all year) Yellow! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Torn between two colors | Munts | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 24 | 08-15-2014 01:33 PM |
Torn up nismo bumper... | street2soul | Exterior & Interior | 21 | 05-21-2014 08:17 PM |
Another worn/torn roof | TripleBlkZ | Nissan 370Z Roadster (Convertible) | 21 | 02-16-2012 07:19 PM |
Very torn between the two | JakeZ34 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 18 | 10-18-2009 03:27 AM |
Torn. | jcrosswhite | Other Vehicles | 13 | 06-07-2009 05:49 PM |