![]() |
Originally Posted by agrotech Thanks Tony. The numbers i provided were the STD readings from a dynojet. I thought the pull was supposed to be in 5th as well, but
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
The370Z.com Sponsor
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 2,989
Drives: 2010 GT-R/2007 F-250
Rep Power: 687 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Thanks for the feedback. Your drivetrain loss is also 5%-7% higher with the AT vs. the MT. Your overall numbers will be lower. It seems like your baseline was done in 5th and your current test was performed in 4th. If that is the case you do not have an "apples to apples" comparison. Please keep me posted to what your finding are. Thanks, Tony
__________________
Follow us on Facebook: Fast Intentions Inc. Phone: (805) 522-FAST (3278) Email: tony@fastintentions.com www.fastintentions.com "FUELED BY PASSION" |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fast Intentions exhaust is here! | F.I. Inc. | Intake/Exhaust | 8307 | 06-09-2012 02:32 PM |
| Fast Intentions exhaust just ordered | Jmigs81 | Intake/Exhaust | 32 | 02-12-2012 03:39 PM |
| Fast Intentions Exhaust | Mark Gomez | Intake/Exhaust | 13 | 05-19-2011 07:51 PM |
| ARK Exhaust vs. Fast Intentions | dnasty370z | Intake/Exhaust | 61 | 09-06-2010 06:25 PM |