RJM Whipple Customer Thread

[Elmo370z]

Originally Posted by bullitt5897

A set 2.25” pipes merging to a single 2.5” pipe isn’t a restriction? So 2 pipes with a 4” cross section each for a total of 8” of cross sectional flow merged to a single 2.5” pipe with a 5” cross sectional flow... what do you call that missing 3” of cross sectional flow? How about the 2 90* bends leading up to it?

Simple math points out to it being an issue. Compare it to a true 3” dual exhaust:

2 tubes with a cross section of 7” each for a combined 14” cross section compared to single 5”cross section... hmmm I wonder which would be more free flowing?

Why wasn’t this address before the tune? Common sense would of told them it was going to be a restriction. Thanks for clearing that up.

[Spooler]

Originally Posted by Elmo370z

Why wasn’t this address before the tune? Common sense would of told them it was going to be a restriction. Thanks for clearing that up.

He isn't in charge of it. For some folks it is beauty over function until the beauty don't function. LOL

[Elmo370z]

Originally Posted by Spooler

He isn't in charge of it. For some folks it is beauty over function until the beauty don't function. LOL

Mall crawlers

[jwick]

Originally Posted by Spooler

He isn't in charge of it. For some folks it is beauty over function until the beauty don't function. LOL

I thought that only applies to women and shoes?