Are the SPL rear camber arms appropriate for a DD car?

clkio

I always say when you want to do something, do right from the first time so it doesn't cost you any issues in the long run (especially on a sports car). When you lower the car, you change the geometry of the suspension a bit and the stock arms just cant keep up anymore with the change that's when SPL arms come in. I dont have anything against SPC, but for me all it takes is for somebody to say I snapped my spc arms so I just stay away all together. Hope that helps a little

vqpower

I would like to do this right, but it seems like there aren't very good options for those who want to lower their car but mostly maintain an OE ride. The SPLs are very well built but there is no denying that the spherical bearings will transmit more NVH and will require regular cleaning and lubing since they aren't sealed. The only reason I haven't just jumped on the SPCs is because I don't like those reports of the arms snapping.

SPC did recently release some new beefier arms though:
Specialty Products Company | SPC Alignment | The Automotive Alignment Leaders

They have a different design and are forged for increased strength and use a new bushing type that is supposed to perform like a monoball but have the durability of the OE part. They claim it doesn't require regular maintenance.

Specialty Products Company | SPC Alignment | The Automotive Alignment Leaders

Since it is so new, I can't find any reviews on it.


EDIT: I should also mention that SPC has revised the design on all rear camber arms for the Z/G to remove the curve. The arms are all straight now for increased strength. I guess this means that SPC's original design was deemed to have inadequate strength.

vqpower

Ah, to hell with it. I'm gonna order my SPL arms later today and call it a day.