|
I do not track my car AND I have 305's in the rear with the above mentioned setup, therefore I chose -1.2 rear camber to keep the fat tires as
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-29-2012, 06:58 AM
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mod Capital of Canada
Age: 59
Posts: 7,354
Drives: cars. lots of cars.
Rep Power: 40183   |
I do not track my car AND I have 305's in the rear with the above mentioned setup, therefore I chose -1.2 rear camber to keep the fat tires as square as possible and still have great handling. More negative camber will have some performance benefits for more aggressive drivers, but greater tire wear.
My fronts do not have camber arms so they are stock and -1.7 with the Swifts. 
__________________
 H&R / Stillen / Berk / HKS / Swift / Michelin / UpRev / SPC / Amuse Rep / Seibon / Fringe XVO / TWM / more... My Journal |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Swift Springs-- Nismo Review!! | JJ-NISMO | Brakes & Suspension | 39 | 07-29-2014 07:59 AM |
| [WTB] Swift Springs | Beastmode | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 1 | 09-13-2011 04:46 PM |
| BC ERs with Swift Springs and RA Valving REVIEW / (Picture Heavy) | Mozen | Brakes & Suspension | 31 | 05-24-2011 10:46 AM |
| WTB: Swift or H&R Springs | Mr&Mrs | Wanted | 5 | 04-26-2011 10:51 PM |
| Swift Springs | Justin1686 | North East Region | 10 | 02-24-2011 06:58 PM |
418Likes
Threaded Mode
