2013 NFL Thread

[b1adesofcha0s]

Originally Posted by dmhenderson

*cough*

Well they wanted to be a power running team, but they just failed at it pretty hard

[Red__Zed]

Originally Posted by dmhenderson

*cough*

Denver was daring Brady to throw when it was still close. Only time I've ever seen that work out even close to ok.

[b1adesofcha0s]

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

Denver was daring Brady to throw when it was still close. Only time I've ever seen that work out even close to ok.

They were lucky Brady had an off day. Those receivers were open deep on at least 2 different plays he overthrew.

[dmhenderson]

lol indeed

Denver ranked 22nd in the league in points allowed (24.9 ppg)
..allowing an average of 101 rushing yards (surprisingly, 8th in the league) and 254 passing ypg (27th in the league).

That's pretty terrible folks.

[Red__Zed]

Originally Posted by dmhenderson

lol indeed

DRC has more than a bit on Bailey this season

[dmhenderson]

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

DRC has more than a bit on Bailey this season

Well, DRC had their only INT return for a TD but I would still argue that Bailey is the better cover guy. Sure, DRC has more tackles but that's because people don't throw at Bailey and when they do, he defends well.

I've been digging for the past 5 minutes for a "catches allowed" stat and can't find one. Might just be a casual observer's perception of how their defense works (or me just wanting to see an old Skins hero do well).

I really want to look at the numbers but rotoworld doesn't really paint the full picture. I mean I guess you're right in that DRC had 3 picks to bailey's none, but then again - Bailey was never a big interception guy except for that one season where he had like 10. He really was a true shutdown corner.

All that said, their pass defense still blows so it's more of an academic argument than anything.

[Red__Zed]

Originally Posted by dmhenderson

Well, DRC had their only INT return for a TD but I would still argue that Bailey is the better cover guy. Sure, DRC has more tackles but that's because people don't throw at Bailey and when they do, he defends well.

I've been digging for the past 5 minutes for a "catches allowed" stat and can't find one. Might just be a casual observer's perception of how their defense works (or me just wanting to see an old Skins hero do well).

I really want to look at the numbers but rotoworld doesn't really paint the full picture. I mean I guess you're right in that DRC had 3 picks to bailey's none, but then again - Bailey was never a big interception guy except for that one season where he had like 10. He really was a true shutdown corner.

All that said, their pass defense still blows so it's more of an academic argument than anything.

He sat out almost every game this year and has been getting lit up covering wr3s. He's not what he used to be, not even close. He's old but more importantly hurt. I mean, I'm wearing my orange # 24 jersey to the game Sunday and I can see that.

[dmhenderson]

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

He sat out almost every game this year and has been getting lit up covering wr3s. He's not what he used to be, not even close. He's old but more importantly hurt. I mean, I'm wearing my orange # 24 jersey to the game Sunday and I can see that.

[b1adesofcha0s]

I don't expect them to be as run heavy this game unless they're trying to protect a lead. Especially if they have Dobson/Thompkins playing, they will try to take advantage of the Broncos' secondary. Whichever defense comes up with more turnovers will probably decide this game.

[Haboob]

[LMBmikeZ]

[shadoquad]

[Xplicit97]

HAWKS!!! All you haters can stfu now

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

[Haboob]

Originally Posted by Xplicit97

HAWKS!!! All you haters can stfu now

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Who was hating?


Talk like this is what makes real Seachickens fans look bad.

[Xplicit97]

Originally Posted by Haboob

Who was hating?


Talk like this is what makes real Seachickens fans look bad.

I know its a little late, but there has been a lot of negativity in general towards Seattle. Which is where that comment stemmed from originally. I appologize it was out of line and I wasn't referring to anyone on here. It just seemed to be the general consensus outside of the PNW, but thats just my perspective. Most of the negative comments originated from niner fans, and people who account Seahawks success to the stadium, and not the team who played in it. That being said I was really hoping for a good game.. My wife is a die hard Broncos fan living in the PNW. I wasn't sure going in who would win, but I believed it would be close. I don't think anyone saw this coming like has already been stated. The last part of the game was boring, and thats coming from a Hawks fan... The win was amazing and it serves to show the teams skills, and that it's not just our stadium. All I gotta say is its a bummer for Peyton but it REALLY sucks to be Maywhether right now a cool 10.4 mil gone.. lol. Not sure what was meant by a real "Seachickens fan", but I'm 34 and have lived here my whole life. I remember the Kingdoms days of Chuck Knox, Steve Raibel, Brian Bosworth, and Cortez Kennedy to name a few.. Pretty sure I'm no Johnny come lately bandwagon fan, however everyone has to start as a fan somewhere

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2