10-13-2017, 12:26 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,894
Drives: 2011 ZR PW w/Clutch
Rep Power: 418354
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotrodz
I guess I was not clear enough as I agree that it would not be fair comparison or worth much a discussion talking about and old NA engine.
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
|
the issue with the current PU is it consists many components and the cost from R&D to manufacturing is very costly, thus lots of manufactures are hesitating to go for it.
Thus I am, as many others are, thinking the current PU is not actually cost effective, it does cost more to build and it cost more for the teams to pay.
I wish the new engine will be a bit more simple and less costly, thus more manufactures can get involved, more competitive, thus the result is more exciting races.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
174Likes
Threaded Mode
