|
Originally Posted by ajc1884 340 HP....base is 70 K? Really Jaguar? ill stick with my 33 K base 370z......PLUS yours looks like mine...copy cats.... Try to think this one through.
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-19-2013, 07:16 AM
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 362
Drives: MB Roadster (sold)
Rep Power: 16  |
Quote:
1. SC v6 has a far broader torque band then the NA Z: the engine is a beast 2. Classic Jag styling, subjective but its a looker. 3. Much better interior and customization available 4. Target market: Cayman/Boxster or low end 911 Copy cats...that's pun-ny  Most folks copy Jag styling given they are classics. The Z will remain a sports car and is a fantastic package for what it is.The F type is a bit porky IMHO, so to me its leans more GT then Sports car when comparing it to a Boxster. Kudos for Jaguar for bringing this sucker to market. With the exception of the transmission choices, I could see myself actually lusting after one for once. - b |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2014 Chevrolet Camaro LS7, Twin-Turbo V-6 Revealed In 2014 GM Document | 96bigbody | Other Vehicles | 2 | 12-21-2012 07:47 PM |
| Jaguar C-X16 | toxik | Other Vehicles | 22 | 03-16-2012 10:38 PM |
| Jaguar C-X75 Range Extended Electric Supercar | Jeffblue | Other Vehicles | 2 | 09-30-2010 01:15 PM |
| Jaguar SFR Bonneville 225.675 MPH | AK370Z | Other Vehicles | 7 | 01-25-2009 02:21 AM |
25Likes
Threaded Mode
