|
Originally Posted by m4a1mustang Yes but those 4.6Ls are all pushing over 300 lb-ft of torque. Sent from my DROID2 using Tapatalk Not to mention its been around for a
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
10-18-2011, 03:08 PM
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 120   |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
10-18-2011, 03:10 PM
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 3,277
Drives: 2010 Z Coupe M6 SPT
Rep Power: 22 |
Quote:
Yea the tq is nice, but it did not help it much. The 350 was as fast or faster during the 4.6L Stang life span.
__________________
2010 Base+Sport 6spd: Stillen G3, FI Non-Resonated CBE, FI Non-Resonated Test Pipes, UpRev Tuned, Custom 24R Oil Cooler, JDM Rear Fog-OEM Harness. ???Whp ???WTQ (Will find out come spring time) |
|
|
|
|
10-18-2011, 03:17 PM
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SATX
Posts: 3,296
Drives: Z
Rep Power: 22 |
Quote:
__________________
09 GT-R 12' 370Z 7AT HANDED DOWN 12'+13' 5.0 SOLD |
|
|
|
|
10-18-2011, 04:04 PM
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 291
Drives: 2010 370z BC M6
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
the 260hp sorta sucked but the torque was great, assuming you knew how to drive it. Unfortunately most people can't seem to handle a car that makes such great low end torque and thus why you saw 350s beat them here and there. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
