Nissan 370Z Forum  

Toyota FT-86/FR-S

I'll admit, the concept looks absolutely awesome, but I can assure you we are in for a HUGE disappointment when the final specs are confirmed. It will be all show,

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z General Area > The Lounge (Off Topic) > Other Vehicles


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-21-2011, 09:38 PM   #1 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Port Washington, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 183
Drives: 2004 RX-8
Rep Power: 18
mjd77 is on a distinguished road
Default

I'll admit, the concept looks absolutely awesome, but I can assure you we are in for a HUGE disappointment when the final specs are confirmed. It will be all show, no go. Subaru will be the one that eventually ends up with the big boy version of this car.


What really pisses me off is that IMO, an ideal balanced car in the affordable sports car segment should be between 2800-3000 lbs with 275-300 hp. It's almost as if it can't be done. Out of all the car brands I don't think there is a single car that fits those specs. The Z and the RX-8 are probably the 2 closest cars to that range. The 8 needs about 50 more HP and the Z needs to lose about 2-3oo lbs.

Last edited by mjd77; 04-21-2011 at 09:50 PM.
mjd77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 03:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 46
Drives: an automobile
Rep Power: 17
iff2mastamatt is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjd77 View Post
I'll admit, the concept looks absolutely awesome, but I can assure you we are in for a HUGE disappointment when the final specs are confirmed. It will be all show, no go. Subaru will be the one that eventually ends up with the big boy version of this car.


What really pisses me off is that IMO, an ideal balanced car in the affordable sports car segment should be between 2800-3000 lbs with 275-300 hp. It's almost as if it can't be done. Out of all the car brands I don't think there is a single car that fits those specs. The Z and the RX-8 are probably the 2 closest cars to that range. The 8 needs about 50 more HP and the Z needs to lose about 2-3oo lbs.
I think the FR-S is targeted to perspective buyers as being a sporty/fuel-economic car. It is more of a CR-Z competitor than anything else, except without the hybrid aspect. If it can get 30 mpg and go 0-60 in a little over 6 seconds, I think that is admirable.
iff2mastamatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 03:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
theDreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4212
theDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iff2mastamatt View Post
I think the FR-S is targeted to perspective buyers as being a sporty/fuel-economic car. It is more of a CR-Z competitor than anything else, except without the hybrid aspect. If it can get 30 mpg and go 0-60 in a little over 6 seconds, I think that is admirable.
Which is why people will be upset.
I think most were hoping for a lightweight RWD sport coupe, MPG is not something they should be considering, just a bonus if it happens.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN
theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY
Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram
theDreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 11:25 PM   #4 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Port Washington, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 183
Drives: 2004 RX-8
Rep Power: 18
mjd77 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theDreamer View Post
Which is why people will be upset.
I think most were hoping for a lightweight RWD sport coupe, MPG is not something they should be considering, just a bonus if it happens.

Just imagine if the V-6 Mustang could lose about 400 lbs. It would then come in around 3000, with 300 hp and you could probably get 35mpg in mostly highway driving. I don't see any reason why nearly every brand couldn't create an affordable sports car/coupe near that spec range.
mjd77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 11:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Red__Zed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121
Red__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjd77 View Post
Just imagine if the V-6 Mustang could lose about 400 lbs. It would then come in around 3000, with 300 hp and you could probably get 35mpg in mostly highway driving. I don't see any reason why nearly every brand couldn't create an affordable sports car/coupe near that spec range.
Safety regulations.
Red__Zed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 07:52 PM   #6 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Port Washington, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 183
Drives: 2004 RX-8
Rep Power: 18
mjd77 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red__Zed View Post
Safety regulations.
I don't buy that "we can't make cars much lighter because of safety regulations" crap. If safety regs. cause a need for added weight, how does Lotus get away with a 2100 lb car with 200hp?

Last edited by mjd77; 04-27-2011 at 07:55 PM.
mjd77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 08:05 PM   #7 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Red__Zed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121
Red__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond reputeRed__Zed has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjd77 View Post
I don't buy that "we can't make cars much lighter because of safety regulations" crap. If safety regs. cause a need for added weight, how does Lotus get away with a 2100 lb car with 200hp?
There's nothing to them.
Red__Zed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2011, 09:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
theDreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4212
theDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond reputetheDreamer has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjd77 View Post
I don't buy that "we can't make cars much lighter because of safety regulations" crap. If safety regs. cause a need for added weight, how does Lotus get away with a 2100 lb car with 200hp?
It is safety regulations, and to make it the same weight or lighter requires more expensive equipment which raise the price.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN
theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY
Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram
theDreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2011, 08:30 PM   #9 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 46
Drives: an automobile
Rep Power: 17
iff2mastamatt is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjd77 View Post
I don't buy that "we can't make cars much lighter because of safety regulations" crap. If safety regs. cause a need for added weight, how does Lotus get away with a 2100 lb car with 200hp?
There are rumours that the FR-S might be around 2200 lbs, but don't take my word for that.
iff2mastamatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 04:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
Lug
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 21
Lug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iff2mastamatt View Post
I think the FR-S is targeted to perspective buyers as being a sporty/fuel-economic car. It is more of a CR-Z competitor than anything else, except without the hybrid aspect. If it can get 30 mpg and go 0-60 in a little over 6 seconds, I think that is admirable.
The 6 banger Mustang does better than that for about $22K, MSRP.
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs
Lug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 08:21 PM   #11 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 420
Jordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond reputeJordo! has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lug View Post
The 6 banger Mustang does better than that for about $22K, MSRP.
Yeah, but it will corner like a dump truck by comparison

That said, don't get me wrong -- I'm in the "this car needs decent HP" camp. A lot of the fan base apparently is unconcerned with how fast this thing is in a straight line.
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it.
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 09:29 PM   #12 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 46
Drives: an automobile
Rep Power: 17
iff2mastamatt is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordo! View Post
Yeah, but it will corner like a dump truck by comparison

That said, don't get me wrong -- I'm in the "this car needs decent HP" camp. A lot of the fan base apparently is unconcerned with how fast this thing is in a straight line.
Correctomundo. Toyota wants this to be a "cornering car", but it would be nice if it can compete with similar cars in it's price range in a straight line. I'm afraid that it will be over $25K and have under 200hp, thus making more like an RX-8 than a Z. We can only wait for the final specs to be released...
iff2mastamatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 02:00 AM   #13 (permalink)
Track Member
 
DJ-of-E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 676
Drives: 00 Toyota Celica 040
Rep Power: 17
DJ-of-E is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iff2mastamatt View Post
Correctomundo. Toyota wants this to be a "cornering car", but it would be nice if it can compete with similar cars in it's price range in a straight line. I'm afraid that it will be over $25K and have under 200hp, thus making more like an RX-8 than a Z. We can only wait for the final specs to be released...
I'm fine with that. Everything has to start somewhere. At the end, all car companies car about is the bottom line. I don't think Toyota would car about performance if they could sell bajillion of the cars, like the tC.

I mean, how the heck did Scion tC got so many sales between 2004 - 2007? Price and looks. I'm pretty sure performance isn't something Toyota wants if it can't move metal to the people. Hell, there are more convertible mustangs sold in U.S. than 370z.
DJ-of-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toyota confirms Toyota FT-86 sports coupe coming to North America 1bad350z Other Vehicles 81 05-12-2010 09:09 AM
Toyota FT-86 Pictures bigu Other Vehicles 16 02-28-2010 03:21 PM
Toyota gets serious 370Zsteve The Lounge (Off Topic) 13 10-22-2009 06:35 PM
Huge new set of Toyota FT-86. Probably never seen before. 1bad350z Other Vehicles 11 10-17-2009 08:23 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2