![]() |
Is the Z NOT a tuner friendly car?
Sorry to bring this topic up, but i've been thinking about it a lot lately and its kind of pissing me off. I really love my car and I want it to be the best. BUT, our cars are slow. I'm not talking about stock for stock, as it is a decent contender stock (+oil cooler?), but rather as a performance car. I'm realizing more and more that the Z is more of a GT car than a sports car. Its smooth, looks sexy, and is down right the biggest attention getter on the road, this side of a supercar. But, who wants a stock car?
The manual trans for example, is smooth, but quirky and cannot be shifted fast. And, don't get me started on the clutch hydraulic system. SRM is a joy, but downshifting is only a part of the puzzle. The Auto guys seem to do well, if thats your thing. But, it will never be like a superior twin clutch trans and it will blow if you give it more than NA power. The VVEL, oh the VVEL. This is the best and worst part of this car. GREAT, if you want to keep a stock car. Real shitty from a tuner stand point. I hope Ecutek holds true to its control. Otherwise, we will all put down less power with FI than the HR motors unless we can figure something out. I'm just ranting at this point. There is a lot I can say, but it might not be worth it. Some can say to sell the car and get something else, but I cant. There is something about this car. Its such a joy. I fills a great void considering I can't afford a porsche or the like. HOWEVER, it is not a tuner car at all. Evo's, Sti's, and even the BRZ/FRS are leaps and beyonds ahead of the Z in that aspect. I guess, i'm just pissed because I realize that now. Sorry for the rant. |
:facepalm:
|
Quote:
iggylist updated. |
Quote:
|
:wtf2:
|
Quote:
Does iggylist mean ignore list? Did my post offend you? |
Quote:
I take it you disagree? |
I'm not sure why all the negativity to my post. Did I offend anyone by belittling the Z? Listen, i've owned a few tuner cars. I'm not new to the game. But, the Z sucks as a tuner car. I think my issue is with my self really. Maybe i'm just not old enough yet to respect a car like the Z.
|
Quote:
Find me a HR making this on pump gas. http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8545/8...6d8eef27_b.jpg Galeforces Build. |
Quote:
And you think a dyno graph is the end to all? I didn't know this was a forum of supra owners. No offence to GaleForce. I don't know him and those are stout figures. But, the picture is in no way reference to the performance of his car. Go talk to guys like SPOHN and MIKE and you'll know what I mean. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think a picture of a reputable tuning company is a very good tell tale sign of what the car can do. |
Quote:
|
Another regret thread?
|
****, i thought i bought a sports car..
|
Quote:
manual trans is slow shifting? sounds like user error auto trans can't take high power and isn't a much more expensive dct? meh VVEL can't be programed? this is your only point? |
A little research before you bought the car would have gone a long way on this front.
( Click to show/hide )
|
Quote:
Nissan misled me greatly. :( And OP, dyno numbers not proving anything? :facepalm: :gtfo2: What other kind of proof do you want? Butt-dyno results? |
Wow, I wasn't expecting everyone to get so hurt over my thread. I do own a Z. It is modified. I enjoy modifying it, like any other car I would have owned. This thread did not go in the direction I was intending it to go. I'm sorry for hurting all of your feelings. lol wow
I think i'm going through what everyone else did when they switched to a mustang. |
OP why dont you tell us exactly what your wanting out of the car?? how is it not a tuner? just trying to understand. :ugh2:
|
Same here, I'm just confused. Specifics are needed, because last I checked this car was modifiable, tunable, etc. :confused:
Frankly, I'm upset that I had to modify it. Could have saved me some $$ if it was all done from the factory!! :icon17: :icon14: jk |
Forgive my ignorance, but what the heck does "tuner friendly" suppose mean? I mean, by most tuners definition, a silly looking Civic is considered the most tuner friendly car. I think the whole gripe here is money. The Z is expensive to mod. By the way, I've heard a few Evo owners who have come to realize that Mitsubishi isn't too forgiving when it comes to aftermarket upgrades and warranty work..
I'm honestly trying to keep an open mind, but I just don't understand this thread. Maybe I'm misreading it? The Z is on par or better with the Evo, Sti and leaps ahead of BRZ/FRS in terms of performance in stock form. Modified, it's about how much money you have in your bank account. As you pointed out with the BRZ/FRS, it's not about hp numbers. So how about track times? If you actually did some home work, you'd see that it's on Par with the Evo & Sti.....and knocks the BRZ/FRS off the track. The only limitation I see is how much you're willing to spend to make it the car you want it to be. As a side note. You'll likely spend the same amount to get a BRZ/FRS to the same level of performance as a new Z. |
|
Quote:
What direction were you intending the thread to go? That being said there are weak points to the car that have been discussed numerous times. Even if it was a bit of a repost mentioning these in your reasons may have left you with a bit more credibility on the forum. |
Quote:
|
Its tough for me to explain it seems. lol
My evo X had 370whp, bolt ons and tune only. My evo 8 had 420 whp with a small 20g turbo. My DSM also had 400whp with a 20g turbo. All built and tuned by myself. Those cars responded so well to mods, handled and drove so FUN. Also, they were great starting platforms. Go to any auto-x, road coarse, or drag strip and these cars can compete with the best of them. Now, I wanted something new to start with. Part out and trade in my last evo, the 8, and purchased a Z. This is just slightly over a year ago. The Z is a great car. I truelly enjoy it, more than just for its performance. The motor is so smooth. The ride is surprisingly very good. (try driving an Evo or STI, the Z is a BMW compared to those) The car is fantastic. It even gets great gas mileage. I'm contemplating keeping this car for a while, a long while. I'm getting married in September. I have an appointment with Ignition Motorsports to install a Stillen supercharger in October. But, now i'm wondering if its even worth it. A stock turbo Evo will run circles around this car. The Z performs WELL in so many ways, but it does nothing GREATLY. I've come to this conclusion. I either need to get my priorities straight and decide what I want from this car. Or move on. |
Quote:
Sports Car Comparison - 2011 Nissan 370Z vs. 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo GSR - Road & Track |
Quote:
I wish I could throw in the GTR or Z06 into my conversation, but those cars are out of my league. |
Quote:
Evo's make great drag cars, auto-x cars, and road coarse car. I don't see any shop actively trying to compete with a Z in any of those categories outside of Doran Racing. I think some of you are just posting in this thread to derail my point instead of understanding what i'm trying to say. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you're gunning for big gains, the Stillen won't cut it. You need to go with a twin turbo setup. You're also comparing a car design to be NA to a car designed with turbos from the factory. From someone with your experience, it shouldn't be that difficult to understand how the Evo is more receptive to breather mods. Also, by your account, I thought whp numbers and dynos didn't matter? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Ibtl
|
Quote:
Good points! Some cars are just better platforms than others. Like I said before, my issue seems to be with my priorities. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
That's what it sounds like. :tup: As Zman (and others above) have said, FI responds so much more to bolt-ons than NA. It's almost comparing apples to oranges. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2