Sold my 2010 PG Nismo

Mr&Mrs · 10-19-2012, 10:53 PM

Sounds good I will hang around to see pics when it happens

DVSkier · 10-19-2012, 11:39 PM

Ok, here are my driving impressions on the Porsche vs the Nismo. My Nismo was a lot of fun. I ran Michelin Super Sport 305's on rear and 275's on the front. It really woke up the handling on the car. When I first got my Porsche I was amazed at the difference in acceleration. Nissan claims 350 hp and Porsche claims 355 hp. All I have to say is somebody is lying, it is the most powerful extra 5 hp I have ever had! As far as the handling goes I loved the way the Nismo handled. It was very predictable and easy to drive fast in the twistys. The porsche has more feedback in the steering, it feels like your steering wheel has a direct connection with the tires. That being said the Nismo is more forgiving if you get surprised coming aroung a corner. The Porsche has to be driven deliberately or you will be punished for it, you need to have your apex planned so you keep the balance of the car correct, it's a more involving experience. The Porsche pulls so much harder out of the corners it blows you away. The Nismo was more about holding cornering speed and the Porsche corners just as fast but comes out of the corner so much harder. You also need to get on the throttle earlier in the turn so the balance is right. I can't wait until I get some Super Sports on the Porsche, it still has the original tires and i'm waiting to wear them out. The sound system on the Porsche is much better than the Nismo, the instruments have an intuitive placement and the heating and cooling are much quicker to respond. Don't get me wrong, I liked my Nismo but I can see where the difference in price comes from. One more thing, I can actually see out of the rear window and the blind spots are almost non existent on the Porsche. If you ever get a chance you owe it to yourself to try one out.

Fabio88 · 10-19-2012, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVSkier

Ok, here are my driving impressions on the Porsche vs the Nismo. My Nismo was a lot of fun. I ran Michelin Super Sport 305's on rear and 275's on the front. It really woke up the handling on the car. When I first got my Porsche I was amazed at the difference in acceleration. Nissan claims 350 hp and Porsche claims 355 hp. All I have to say is somebody is lying, it is the most powerful extra 5 hp I have ever had! As far as the handling goes I loved the way the Nismo handled. It was very predictable and easy to drive fast in the twistys. The porsche has more feedback in the steering, it feels like your steering wheel has a direct connection with the tires. That being said the Nismo is more forgiving if you get surprised coming aroung a corner. The Porsche has to be driven deliberately or you will be punished for it, you need to have your apex planned so you keep the balance of the car correct, it's a more involving experience. The Porsche pulls so much harder out of the corners it blows you away. The Nismo was more about holding cornering speed and the Porsche corners just as fast but comes out of the corner so much harder. You also need to get on the throttle earlier in the turn so the balance is right. I can't wait until I get some Super Sports on the Porsche, it still has the original tires and i'm waiting to wear them out. The sound system on the Porsche is much better than the Nismo, the instruments have an intuitive placement and the heating and cooling are much quicker to respond. Don't get me wrong, I liked my Nismo but I can see where the difference in price comes from. One more thing, I can actually see out of the rear window and the blind spots are almost non existent on the Porsche. If you ever get a chance you owe it to yourself to try one out.

I almost bought the cayman S before i bought my Z I thought it was a little too pricey for a little over 300 hp.

Compdoc777 · 10-20-2012, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVSkier

Ok, here are my driving impressions on the Porsche vs the Nismo. My Nismo was a lot of fun. I ran Michelin Super Sport 305's on rear and 275's on the front. It really woke up the handling on the car. When I first got my Porsche I was amazed at the difference in acceleration. Nissan claims 350 hp and Porsche claims 355 hp. All I have to say is somebody is lying, it is the most powerful extra 5 hp I have ever had! As far as the handling goes I loved the way the Nismo handled. It was very predictable and easy to drive fast in the twistys. The porsche has more feedback in the steering, it feels like your steering wheel has a direct connection with the tires. That being said the Nismo is more forgiving if you get surprised coming aroung a corner. The Porsche has to be driven deliberately or you will be punished for it, you need to have your apex planned so you keep the balance of the car correct, it's a more involving experience. The Porsche pulls so much harder out of the corners it blows you away. The Nismo was more about holding cornering speed and the Porsche corners just as fast but comes out of the corner so much harder. .

The Nismo is faster. The Porsche may feel faster, but its not. I have raced a few cornering a straight line even the newer models and have had no problems dispatching them.

Did you have an oil cooler on your Nismo?

I have the Yokohama AD08 Neovas and it seems the faster I go the warmer the tires the more I am glued to the ground.

Don't get me wrong Porsche is great, but a good driver in a Nismo will own ya!

Mt Tam I am · 10-20-2012, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVSkier

Ok, here are my driving impressions on the Porsche vs the Nismo. My Nismo was a lot of fun. I ran Michelin Super Sport 305's on rear and 275's on the front. It really woke up the handling on the car. When I first got my Porsche I was amazed at the difference in acceleration. Nissan claims 350 hp and Porsche claims 355 hp. All I have to say is somebody is lying, it is the most powerful extra 5 hp I have ever had! As far as the handling goes I loved the way the Nismo handled. It was very predictable and easy to drive fast in the twistys. The porsche has more feedback in the steering, it feels like your steering wheel has a direct connection with the tires. That being said the Nismo is more forgiving if you get surprised coming aroung a corner. The Porsche has to be driven deliberately or you will be punished for it, you need to have your apex planned so you keep the balance of the car correct, it's a more involving experience. The Porsche pulls so much harder out of the corners it blows you away. The Nismo was more about holding cornering speed and the Porsche corners just as fast but comes out of the corner so much harder. You also need to get on the throttle earlier in the turn so the balance is right. I can't wait until I get some Super Sports on the Porsche, it still has the original tires and i'm waiting to wear them out. The sound system on the Porsche is much better than the Nismo, the instruments have an intuitive placement and the heating and cooling are much quicker to respond. Don't get me wrong, I liked my Nismo but I can see where the difference in price comes from. One more thing, I can actually see out of the rear window and the blind spots are almost non existent on the Porsche. If you ever get a chance you owe it to yourself to try one out.

Nice write up and good explanation of your impressions.

rebe945 · 10-21-2012, 12:03 PM

Looks great. the Porsche

DVSkier · 10-21-2012, 07:45 PM

1st I have always loved the look of the Turbo and the 4s has the same proportions along with the upgraded brakes and wider track. Then I found out that depending on traction needs it transfers between 4 and 40% of the power to the front wheels which lets it still drive like a rear wheel drive but with greater pull out of the corners. Frankly, I didn't realize how good it worked until I bought the car. I had only driven the rear wheel drive versions until I bought this one. Also it turns out that it pull slightly higher skid pad numbers. I can't say I was disappointed about that. It will never see snow but fortunately snow isn't the only place where the all wheel drive improves the handling.

nmjaxx9 · 10-21-2012, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rebe945

Looks great. the Porsche

good choice.

bigsix · 10-20-2012, 12:08 AM

It sounds like the Carrera 4s is pretty demanding to drive fast, like you have to be precise and deliberate with your driving to get the car to respond well. When I first drove a 370z Nismo, I found it difficult and intimidating to drive the car. . . is that how the Carrera 4S is, intimidating? Part of the reason for this in the Nismo was the lack of rearward visibility ( thin rear-view mirror view through the spoiler, non-existent blind-spot over the shoulder view)

It sounds like your Carrera 4S has amazing power and puts it down well with the 4-wheel drive sys. Enjoy !

cossie1600 · 10-20-2012, 12:36 AM

Do you have an issue with the front fender budging up, blocking the view in front of the LF and RF. I thought that was a very weird feature, also the wider rear end than the front took a little to get used to too

LakeShow · 10-20-2012, 12:38 AM

The Carrera 4S then again has all wheel drive which changes driving dynamics quite a bit along with the engine located in the rear. The driver feedback will feel different no matter what between the Z and Porsche. The mid engine design in the Porsche is primarily for handling and the AWD system in the Carrera 4 will feel grippy in any instance compared to the Z.

DVSkier · 10-20-2012, 01:39 AM

Big Six, it's not intimidating, I think because of the responsiveness it just happens quicker. I think the reputation for being hard to drive may preoccupy your thoughts at first. The all wheel drive really helps things but it only delivers between 4 and 40 % of it's power to the front wheels so it still retains the driving characteristics of a rear wheel drive car. You don't even notice the front fenders bulging upwards, the front of the car seems of fall away from your vision so the front end seems very short. The 997 is a rear engine vehicle not a mid engine vehicle, which is why it got a reputation for demanding driving early in it's development. Over the years it has gotten easier and easier to drive the car. I should explain that the limits are so high that you really have to be pushing it to get any hint of the rear end wanting to step out. The biggest thing is just learning to adjust to a different driving style. Driving it fast does take more concentration but in a good way. I guess that is half the fun of driving a twisty road, it takes more talent than a straight road and you get more involved in the experience no matter what car you are driving.

bigsix · 10-21-2012, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVSkier

Big Six, it's not intimidating, I think because of the responsiveness it just happens quicker. I think the reputation for being hard to drive may preoccupy your thoughts at first. The all wheel drive really helps things but it only delivers between 4 and 40 % of it's power to the front wheels so it still retains the driving characteristics of a rear wheel drive car. You don't even notice the front fenders bulging upwards, the front of the car seems of fall away from your vision so the front end seems very short. The 997 is a rear engine vehicle not a mid engine vehicle, which is why it got a reputation for demanding driving early in it's development. Over the years it has gotten easier and easier to drive the car. I should explain that the limits are so high that you really have to be pushing it to get any hint of the rear end wanting to step out. The biggest thing is just learning to adjust to a different driving style. Driving it fast does take more concentration but in a good way. I guess that is half the fun of driving a twisty road, it takes more talent than a straight road and you get more involved in the experience no matter what car you are driving.

What was the reason you chose the all wheel drive version ? I would think Porsche builds a Carrera 4 for enhanced performance rather than just for better traction in wet/cold conditions. All wheel drive versions of every sports sedan/car are popular here in Colorado, as well as Utah. I used to prefer rear wheel drive only, but have grown to like/appreciate all wheel drive for it's dynamic grip & handling.

Cuban Z · 10-20-2012, 09:38 AM

Beautiful car...congrats!

edub370 · 10-20-2012, 10:25 AM

nice pick up. i can say after driving a few porsches pretty hard that its not a car that will easily forgive u if u go past the boundries. the z will start over and understeering top let u know u are over doing it. the porsche is grip grip grip grip GONE. but i can speak to the power of the 911's. it's not that there's that much more, its just the 911's rear engine design allows the car to use them much more effeciently. i.e. punching it a little sooner out of the corner because the back end is completely planted. no hunting for traction like the z.

but again, word to the wise, DO NOT get over confident in this car. it will swap ends faster than u can imagine. ask me how i know lol.

AWESOME pick up tho. i'm jelly

Quote:

Originally Posted by Compdoc777

The Nismo is faster.

Don't get me wrong Porsche is great, but a good driver in a Nismo will own ya!

doubtful... that same driver in the 911 WILL be faster. until u have really driven one to its limits its hard to understand. it really is. the 911 is just a more planted sports car

10-19-2012, 10:53 PM	#1 (permalink)
Mr&Mrs A True Z Fanatic Join Date: May 2010 Location: Tampa Posts: 4,207 Drives: RZ34 Rep Power: 31941	Sounds good I will hang around to see pics when it happens __________________ Project Z <--Click - Check out the link too many mods to list!

10-19-2012, 11:39 PM	#2 (permalink)
DVSkier Base Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Midvale, UT Posts: 34 Drives: 10 370Z Nismo PG M6 Rep Power: 15	Ok, here are my driving impressions on the Porsche vs the Nismo. My Nismo was a lot of fun. I ran Michelin Super Sport 305's on rear and 275's on the front. It really woke up the handling on the car. When I first got my Porsche I was amazed at the difference in acceleration. Nissan claims 350 hp and Porsche claims 355 hp. All I have to say is somebody is lying, it is the most powerful extra 5 hp I have ever had! As far as the handling goes I loved the way the Nismo handled. It was very predictable and easy to drive fast in the twistys. The porsche has more feedback in the steering, it feels like your steering wheel has a direct connection with the tires. That being said the Nismo is more forgiving if you get surprised coming aroung a corner. The Porsche has to be driven deliberately or you will be punished for it, you need to have your apex planned so you keep the balance of the car correct, it's a more involving experience. The Porsche pulls so much harder out of the corners it blows you away. The Nismo was more about holding cornering speed and the Porsche corners just as fast but comes out of the corner so much harder. You also need to get on the throttle earlier in the turn so the balance is right. I can't wait until I get some Super Sports on the Porsche, it still has the original tires and i'm waiting to wear them out. The sound system on the Porsche is much better than the Nismo, the instruments have an intuitive placement and the heating and cooling are much quicker to respond. Don't get me wrong, I liked my Nismo but I can see where the difference in price comes from. One more thing, I can actually see out of the rear window and the blind spots are almost non existent on the Porsche. If you ever get a chance you owe it to yourself to try one out. RoshDawg and icormba like this.

10-21-2012, 12:03 PM	#6 (permalink)
rebe945 Enthusiast Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: middleburg hts, ohio Posts: 491 Drives: 2009 370Z black 7at Rep Power: 16	Nice Looks great. the Porsche

10-20-2012, 12:38 AM	#11 (permalink)
LakeShow A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: L.I., NY Posts: 5,307 Drives: Everything Rep Power: 26	The Carrera 4S then again has all wheel drive which changes driving dynamics quite a bit along with the engine located in the rear. The driver feedback will feel different no matter what between the Z and Porsche. The mid engine design in the Porsche is primarily for handling and the AWD system in the Carrera 4 will feel grippy in any instance compared to the Z. __________________ \|2013 Audi S4\|Ibis White/Black\|S-Tronic P+\| \|2013 370z\|PearlWhite/Persimmon\|Touring/Sport/Nav\|F.I. CBE 18" CF\| \|Sold\|2011 370z\|Gun Metallic\|Touring/Sport/Nav\|

10-20-2012, 09:38 AM	#14 (permalink)
Cuban Z Track Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: SoCal WestSide Posts: 557 Drives: 11 370Z Nismo #0384 Rep Power: 16	Beautiful car...congrats! __________________ 処女 / Shojo Audrey Blue Series 1 240Z (10/70)

10-21-2012, 07:45 PM	#7 (permalink)
DVSkier Base Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Midvale, UT Posts: 34 Drives: 10 370Z Nismo PG M6 Rep Power: 15	1st I have always loved the look of the Turbo and the 4s has the same proportions along with the upgraded brakes and wider track. Then I found out that depending on traction needs it transfers between 4 and 40% of the power to the front wheels which lets it still drive like a rear wheel drive but with greater pull out of the corners. Frankly, I didn't realize how good it worked until I bought the car. I had only driven the rear wheel drive versions until I bought this one. Also it turns out that it pull slightly higher skid pad numbers. I can't say I was disappointed about that. It will never see snow but fortunately snow isn't the only place where the all wheel drive improves the handling.

10-20-2012, 12:08 AM	#9 (permalink)
bigsix A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Thailand Posts: 2,227 Drives: Honda City/Mazda 2 Rep Power: 19	It sounds like the Carrera 4s is pretty demanding to drive fast, like you have to be precise and deliberate with your driving to get the car to respond well. When I first drove a 370z Nismo, I found it difficult and intimidating to drive the car. . . is that how the Carrera 4S is, intimidating? Part of the reason for this in the Nismo was the lack of rearward visibility ( thin rear-view mirror view through the spoiler, non-existent blind-spot over the shoulder view) It sounds like your Carrera 4S has amazing power and puts it down well with the 4-wheel drive sys. Enjoy !

10-20-2012, 12:36 AM	#10 (permalink)
cossie1600 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: californee way Posts: 5,380 Drives: 370, Leaf Rep Power: 31	Do you have an issue with the front fender budging up, blocking the view in front of the LF and RF. I thought that was a very weird feature, also the wider rear end than the front took a little to get used to too

10-20-2012, 01:39 AM	#12 (permalink)
DVSkier Base Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Midvale, UT Posts: 34 Drives: 10 370Z Nismo PG M6 Rep Power: 15	Big Six, it's not intimidating, I think because of the responsiveness it just happens quicker. I think the reputation for being hard to drive may preoccupy your thoughts at first. The all wheel drive really helps things but it only delivers between 4 and 40 % of it's power to the front wheels so it still retains the driving characteristics of a rear wheel drive car. You don't even notice the front fenders bulging upwards, the front of the car seems of fall away from your vision so the front end seems very short. The 997 is a rear engine vehicle not a mid engine vehicle, which is why it got a reputation for demanding driving early in it's development. Over the years it has gotten easier and easier to drive the car. I should explain that the limits are so high that you really have to be pushing it to get any hint of the rear end wanting to step out. The biggest thing is just learning to adjust to a different driving style. Driving it fast does take more concentration but in a good way. I guess that is half the fun of driving a twisty road, it takes more talent than a straight road and you get more involved in the experience no matter what car you are driving.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
SOLD: 2010 40th Anniversary - TX	INNOVATE_1	370Z For Sale	68	05-26-2012 09:22 AM
SOLD: 2010 370Z Base 6MT wt Sport Package Grey 14,600 Miles Northern VA	antares	370Z For Sale	14	04-01-2012 12:15 AM
SOLD: 2010 40th Anniversary wheels - TX	INNOVATE_1	Parts for sale (Private Classifieds)	14	02-13-2012 09:06 PM
SOLD: 2010 Base Custom Paint LOW miles	Falcor	370Z For Sale	24	01-16-2012 03:39 PM
2010 monthly 370Z's sold	dad	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	83	01-14-2011 07:14 PM