![]() |
Originally Posted by 2bits Your first point is good, but it doesn't change mine either. Lol, how important is the Z to reaching that 39 mpg avg considering it's production
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 257
Drives: 06 Mustang GT
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I think the abrupt increases in the MPG standards *will* affect the Z's design. Sure, it's not a huge seller or a huge percentage of Nissan's US sales, but having a car that is currently 16 or 17 MPG under the standard that will be law in 7 short years will call for some fairly significant engineering. And besides, with a 39 mpg standard, Nissan is gonna have to sell a good number of cars that EXCEED that level in order to make up for the Z and all its other low MPG cars. How many Nissan models get more than 39 mpg? I can't think of any. The Z may be especially vulnerable simply because Nissan is a smaller car company that may not have the capital to so radically re-engineer their product line. The easiest way for them to meet the standards will be to eliminate low-mileage cars like the Z from their lineup entirely. It may be pessimistic, but this is truly the way I see it going down.
__________________
Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|