![]() |
How CAFE Ratings Work - Auto - FOXNews.com That is a good read on CAFE standards. I think nissan will be fine meeting the goal. Some of the others further
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fort Drum, NY
Posts: 32
Drives: golf cart
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
How CAFE Ratings Work - Auto - FOXNews.com
That is a good read on CAFE standards. I think nissan will be fine meeting the goal. Some of the others further down the list have some things to worry about. Nissan is already at 32.2. They will just improve their small car offering and more people will buy them. Plus gas is bound to be higher in a few years and that will help them sell more fuel efficient cars too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 97
Drives: '09 370Z T-SP-7AT
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
It is utterly unrealistic to think moving to a 39 mpg CAFE won't have a radical impact on the offerings of the industry. Just within the last six months, the CAFE zealots at EPA and NHTSA have published documents saying that a 36 mpg standard was technologically infeasible by 2016. If those in government who want it most think it won't work . . . . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North East
Posts: 6,203
Drives: 09 370Z Sport M6
Rep Power: 655 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's scare tactics. When they realize that the majority can't comply they will push the date back. I'm sure the auto manufacturers (except Toyota) have already dispatched their lobbyists to Washington.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 455
Drives: 09 yellow 370z
Rep Power: 267 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I strongly believe we will see the death of cars like the Z, the Mustang GT, the Camaro SS (we harly knew ya), and maybe even the Corvette. GM has already done away with their high performance vehicle operations department. They said they will still produce the cars that are out there, but have no plans to develop new ones. It is going to be an expensive proposition for car companies to develop these cars. I don't see them spending much to develop better sports cars that will only bring down their overall CAFE rating. Enjoy these cars while you still can. I don't know how many years it will be before this country comes back to it's senses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9
Drives: 07 Nissan Maxima
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Remember, this new change is only thanks to a recent SCOTUS ruling. Should the population within the next few years see a backlash from this federal overstepping (which, as history has shown us, they most likely will) then you'll see alot of these restrictions go away. Sure, these standards will still cripple industry and sales in states like NY and California, but it will do far less harm, especially when people see how many jobs this move will cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3596 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I really think all-electric cars are the future, or 'hybrids' in the sense of cars that are designed as full electrics, but have a tiny fixed-rpm gasoline engine hooked up to a generator to provide a range boost over the capacity of the battery packs alone. They're way more efficient in terms of energy production and utilization, and we already have the grid to distribute the juice (and gas stations for the long-range generators).
Won't get in the way of performance either. A good all-electric performance car can knock the socks off a gas car. You get 4 electric motors (one in each wheel)... AWD with full torque at any speed (starting at zero), engine braking that pretty much obviates the need for traditional brakes, and capable of much more advance traction and stability control with an advanced cpu controlling the 4 motor controllers (imagine a computer that could choose the engine torque delivered to each individual wheel precisely, on top of what can be done with TCS/launch-control systems today). Oh and did I mention no gearing necessary at all? No driveline losses, no clutch, no transmission, no differential, etc. The only thing holding back that vision of the future, at this point, is the need for more advanced batteries and/or supercapacitors to be developed, and for the cost of those components to drop drastically. It will happen, it's just a question of when. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
|
Quote:
My original point remains. Yes, things will advance and change as they always have. The Z will ever evolve, and Nissan will pump up mileage on the commodity models to reach the required average. Big deal. Can we stop the hyperbole now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North East
Posts: 6,203
Drives: 09 370Z Sport M6
Rep Power: 655 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 257
Drives: 06 Mustang GT
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
Having that raised to 39 mpg in 7 years... that's pretty significant when it hasn't risen in nearly 20 years. I'd say being worried that a 40% increase in the CAFE standards in the next 7 years might adversely affect the Z is not hyperbole at all.
__________________
Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
|
Quote:
Your second point is not so good. Marquee models with their accompanying lower mpg are a reality for most manufactures because they don't sell that many of them. If Nissan sold 50k+ Z's, you'd be right. But they don't. Hyperbole and hysteria in this thread? Yes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 257
Drives: 06 Mustang GT
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
I think the abrupt increases in the MPG standards *will* affect the Z's design. Sure, it's not a huge seller or a huge percentage of Nissan's US sales, but having a car that is currently 16 or 17 MPG under the standard that will be law in 7 short years will call for some fairly significant engineering. And besides, with a 39 mpg standard, Nissan is gonna have to sell a good number of cars that EXCEED that level in order to make up for the Z and all its other low MPG cars. How many Nissan models get more than 39 mpg? I can't think of any. The Z may be especially vulnerable simply because Nissan is a smaller car company that may not have the capital to so radically re-engineer their product line. The easiest way for them to meet the standards will be to eliminate low-mileage cars like the Z from their lineup entirely. It may be pessimistic, but this is truly the way I see it going down.
__________________
Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 18
Drives: '04 Pontiac GTO
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
CAFE was first passed in 1975 and didnt actually kick in until 1978.
Corporate Average Fuel Economy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia You can't blame it (directly) for the death of any of the classic muscle/sport cars you mentioned. It just piled some extra dirt on top of their corpses. What killed the musclecars was a combination of higher gas prices, high insurance, the changeover to unleaded gas, and the increasing amount of emission controls. But none of those are CAFE. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|